![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,840 Joined: 24-July 02 From: Lubbock, TX Member No.: 3,024 ![]() |
I tend to agree that CGL will stick with 4th edition for a good while to come, just with all the troubles and issues, it seems the last thing they'd want to do is throw out a ton of effort that went into holding onto the license and putting out books.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,899 Joined: 29-October 09 From: Leiden, the Netherlands Member No.: 17,814 ![]() |
Is there any noise at all from CGL that they're considering a new edition?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
I tend to agree that CGL will stick with 4th edition for a good while to come, just with all the troubles and issues, it seems the last thing they'd want to do is throw out a ton of effort that went into holding onto the license and putting out books. Indeed... And, like Fatum, I would heavily resist the "Progress" of a new Edition. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,840 Joined: 24-July 02 From: Lubbock, TX Member No.: 3,024 ![]() |
I want a new matrix book going back to UMS icons though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Man Behind the Curtain ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 14,871 Joined: 2-July 89 From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road Member No.: 3 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
Indeed... And, like Fatum, I would heavily resist the "Progress" of a new Edition. Never said I'd resist it if it is noticeably better, just that I'll be extremely cautious.Surely this is worthy of an administrative warning? No? No single TOS element bans this? Excuse me while I go update the TOS. You could call it trolling, maybe... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 ![]() |
It's easy to troll on the forums when you're over three meters tall and have horns.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 705 Joined: 3-April 11 Member No.: 26,658 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Man Behind the Curtain ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 14,871 Joined: 2-July 89 From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road Member No.: 3 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
Resisted by WIL + Counterspelling, if available.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 705 Joined: 3-April 11 Member No.: 26,658 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#38
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Great, we're a low-end Dues. EDIT: Or Dues if he grew up Ghetto. A Ghetto Deus? Sorry, I just could not stop laughing at that one. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#39
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 18-August 11 Member No.: 36,178 ![]() |
I think Shadowrun needs a complete makeover.
Sure the 4ed is more streamlined but it's still full of inherited waste and very clunky. The rules need to be purged badly. I'd prefer them to be less complex and more abstract. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
I think Shadowrun needs a complete makeover. Sure the 4ed is more streamlined but it's still full of inherited waste and very clunky. The rules need to be purged badly. I'd prefer them to be less complex and more abstract. MORE Abstract? Really? Hmmmmm..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#41
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
The WIL is around 2, 3 tops I'd say judging by the number of glitches resulting in thread derails and pages of pointless bickering.
As to the drain, let's see. Obviously, not Physical (0), Area (+2), Instant (+0), Mental Manipulation (+0), Major Change (+2). So, F/2+4! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#42
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 18-August 11 Member No.: 36,178 ![]() |
MORE Abstract? Really? Hmmmmm..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) The basic rules are abstract but certain fields are too simulation-like. Depending on the archetype I'm playing I feel more like an accountant than a player.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#43
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,272 Joined: 22-June 10 From: Omaha. NE Member No.: 18,746 ![]() |
The basic rules are abstract but certain fields are too simulation-like. Depending on the archetype I'm playing I feel more like an accountant than a player. Amen. Recoil (& compensation) and Social skill modifiers make me yearn for AD&D's (1st ed) encumbrance rules. I enjoy hacking because it means I can go on a food run and not miss anything. I think some people enjoy 4th ed, because it allows them to argue online and feel smarter than other people because they have the one true interpretation. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#44
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
If you think recoil is a complex mechanic, I don't understand how you got through hacking, unless your GM throws 3/4 of the rules away.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#45
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,700 Joined: 1-July 10 Member No.: 18,778 ![]() |
If it was organized and consistent, I'd switch today. I've lost track of the number of hacking threads that claim the authors didn't even understand their own rules. I've watched people argue that rules are fluff (which leaves us with entire situations that have no rules). I'm convinced that not only do I still not understand the rules, I'm convinced that not a single poster on Dumpshock understands the rules. (Though some of them will argue against that with their dying breath.) We should not be this far into things and still not have a clue what you need to spoof, how to spoof, or why you would bother. Despite skinlinking to keep someone from ejecting your "clip", I don't think we can get two people to agree HOW a hacker actually goes through the process of getting your "clip" to eject in-combat before combat is over, even if it isn't skinlinked. All 5th has to do to win me over is be organized and consistent, to the point where everyone understands it. I completely agree with Suoq about this. If 5e has rules that are clear, consistent, and understandable, I would switch today. My personal metaphor for the SR4 matrix rules is the Mirror of Galadriel. Everyone who looks at them sees something different, and there's no way to know if its nonsense, what the developers intended, what the developers wrote, what was written by 2 different developers who weren't on speaking terms, or what the rules actually say. And if you look too closely, the burning eye of the technomancy rules melts your brain. The only way to understand the matrix rules is to understand that there are no matrix rules. They can't be fully understood because there just is not a complete, consistent system present to understand. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#46
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 705 Joined: 3-April 11 Member No.: 26,658 ![]() |
Amen. Recoil (& compensation) and Social skill modifiers make me yearn for AD&D's (1st ed) encumbrance rules. I enjoy hacking because it means I can go on a food run and not miss anything. I think some people enjoy 4th ed, because it allows them to argue online and feel smarter than other people because they have the one true interpretation. What recoil and recoil compensation is complicated and open to interpretation? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#47
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,700 Joined: 1-July 10 Member No.: 18,778 ![]() |
Recoil is pretty cut and dry, but it is sure as hell not simple because of the convoluted stacking rules. If you have a sling, a foregrip, and a shock pad on an Ares Alpha, how much recoil compensation do you have? No peeking at Arsenal!
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
...you have to calculate it once.
Yeah, you need tables to calculate RC - many other mechanics require those, too; there's nothing wrong with that. Like, if you're a rogue, what's your bab and fort save on level 11? No peeking at PHB! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#49
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 ![]() |
Recoil is pretty cut and dry, but it is sure as hell not simple because of the convoluted stacking rules. If you have a sling, a foregrip, and a shock pad on an Ares Alpha, how much recoil compensation do you have? No peeking at Arsenal! Semi-Auto, Short Burst, Long Burst, or Full Auto?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#50
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,272 Joined: 22-June 10 From: Omaha. NE Member No.: 18,746 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th May 2025 - 05:21 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.