![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#126
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Notably, spotting is what you do AUTOMATICALLY if an icon is not Running Silent.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#127
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Wow, I love circular arguments. It allows exactly what it says it allows. Damn. Circular is best... You always come back to where you started, and you never get lost. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#128
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 99 Joined: 9-December 09 Member No.: 17,955 ![]() |
You still haven't accounted for ALL the rules in your reading, wraith. In your reading of the rules, what does the line about knowing a feature about an icon Running Silent mean? Knowing doesn't mean guessing. You can guess that is a device out there that has a Sleaze attribute, but until you perceive it and discern that it does you are only guessing, not knowing. I'm going to go with DMK's/TJ's interpretation. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#129
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 250 Joined: 22-December 09 Member No.: 17,988 ![]() |
The way I interpret it is as follows: "Feature" is one of the other pieces of information from the Matrix Perception table. So, DR is a feature. Matrix Attribute Rating is a feature. Etc. So, you start out not knowing *anything*. You need a Matrix Perception check (Simple Test) to determine if there are any Running Silent devices out there. Once you know that there are Running Silent devices out there, you pick one at random and try to learn more about it by using Matrix Perception (Opposed Test, Computer + Intuition [Data Processing] vs. Logic + Sleaze.) Other then the fact that it's Opposed, this is a normal Matrix Perception check. Meaning that for every net hit, you learn a feature of the device. Once you've learned a feature, you can spot the device. You can now go back to Matrix Perception (Simple Test) to learn more, or use other Matrix Actions (or Resonance Actions in the case of a TM) on that device. I believe everyone is missing that other part of running silent: QUOTE (pg 235 Spotting Duration) Once you’ve spotted an icon in the Matrix, you continue to spot it even if it initiates silent running. So if you spot and icon you know information about it (such as "it is a firearm"). The owner switches it to silent running. You would lose that icon except you know something about that icon (because you spotted it before it went silent) therefore you continue to spot it or can re-find it without having to use the opposed test on it. I agree though, if you haven't spotted it before, you know nothing about it until you have passed the opposed test on the hidden icon. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#130
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
I believe everyone is missing that other part of running silent: So if you spot and icon you know information about it (such as "it is a firearm"). The owner switches it to silent running. You would lose that icon except you know something about that icon (because you spotted it before it went silent) therefore you continue to spot it or can re-find it without having to use the opposed test on it. And viola... I admit I forgot that piece of information... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#131
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 250 Joined: 22-December 09 Member No.: 17,988 ![]() |
Bob the Decker is walking down the street when he spots a couple of Yakuza enforcers chatting on the corner. Bob owes the Yaks money, and likes having all of his fingers, so isn't really interested in a fight. Only one of them has a gun, though, and he figures if he can disable it real fast, he can bolt and they won't catch him. So, Bob scans the area for icons and doesn't see the gun. Fair enough, he'd automatically spot it if it was online normally. He looks harder (makes a Matrix Perception Test), and makes a success! With that, he can spot that there are two icons running silent in his signal range (100m). Likely one of these is the gun he wants! Now, he has a hard choice to make. The Yaks haven't noticed him, so he decides to go ahead and try and spot the gun's icon. He picks the icon he thinks is most likely (The GM or Player chooses randomly) and starts checking it out (rolls Computer+Intuition [Data Processing] vs the icon's Logic + Sleaze). Bob's doing well today, and he manages a net hit on the first icon, spotting it! He quickly checks it for more information (Matrix Perception Test), and discovers it is a commlink belonging to the unarmed Yak. Curses. Well, time to try the next icon. Since there is only one running silent icon left in range, it is the only possible choice, and he rolls against next. Meanwhile, the Yakuza have noticed the guy trying to duck behind a stall and fiddling with a cyberdeck, and are coming over! Bob rushes through, making all the rolls needed to unmask the icon! It's a sign on the nearby building that the proprietor didn't want skriptkiddiez hacking. The Yakuza proceeds to shoot Bob in the face with his throwback pistol. Great example by the way wraith!! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#132
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Knowing doesn't mean guessing. You can guess that is a device out there that has a Sleaze attribute, but until you perceive it and discern that it does you are only guessing, not knowing. I'm going to go with DMK's/TJ's interpretation And that's where the second part of the question comes in. How would the action be meaningfully different if you're speculating? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#133
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
And that's where the second part of the question comes in. How would the action be meaningfully different if you're speculating? Did you completely ignore Fogarn's post? Number 129, I believe. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#134
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 681 Joined: 23-March 10 From: Japan Member No.: 18,343 ![]() |
I do appreciate the viewpoint. SR5's Matrix rules are, I agree, pretty absurd. That said, I am still having trouble fathoming how Rhat isn't understanding this, although it's likely he's just trolling. Let's use an in-game example. Bob the Decker is walking down the street when he spots a couple of Yakuza enforcers chatting on the corner. Bob owes the Yaks money, and likes having all of his fingers, so isn't really interested in a fight. Only one of them has a gun, though, and he figures if he can disable it real fast, he can bolt and they won't catch him. So, Bob scans the area for icons and doesn't see the gun. Fair enough, he'd automatically spot it if it was online normally. He looks harder (makes a Matrix Perception Test), and makes a success! With that, he can spot that there are two icons running silent in his signal range (100m). Likely one of these is the gun he wants! Now, he has a hard choice to make. The Yaks haven't noticed him, so he decides to go ahead and try and spot the gun's icon. He picks the icon he thinks is most likely (The GM or Player chooses randomly) and starts checking it out (rolls Computer+Intuition [Data Processing] vs the icon's Logic + Sleaze). Bob's doing well today, and he manages a net hit on the first icon, spotting it! He quickly checks it for more information (Matrix Perception Test), and discovers it is a commlink belonging to the unarmed Yak. Curses. Well, time to try the next icon. Since there is only one running silent icon left in range, it is the only possible choice, and he rolls against next. Meanwhile, the Yakuza have noticed the guy trying to duck behind a stall and fiddling with a cyberdeck, and are coming over! Bob rushes through, making all the rolls needed to unmask the icon! It's a sign on the nearby building that the proprietor didn't want skriptkiddiez hacking. The Yakuza proceeds to shoot Bob in the face with his throwback pistol. Now, Rhat, do you understand why you don't actually -know- anything about running silent icons? You can assume all day that there's an icon for that object you want to hack out there, but the random selection is there because your character has no idea which one it would be, or if it even has an icon. You can't filter icons with no information about them. I like this example. Now a question. Since the decker knows there is a gun, can he attempt to look for its silent running icon? From your example, the decker is assuming that of the two silent icons one of them is the gun. When the decker rolls his (opposed) perception test against the gun and fails he could assume that either the gun is better hidden than he thought or that it indeed does not have a hidden icon. But knowing that there is a gun and there are silent icons, would this be possible? The text does state that knowing an attribute of the icon allows this, and knowing that the gun should be generating an icon IMO should allow the roll. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#135
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Did you completely ignore Fogarn's post? Number 129, I believe. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Didn't really answer the question. Searching for something you know is present (though you don't, since the device might have been shut down) isn't meaningfully different from searching for something you know is there, especially from an in game standpoint. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#136
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
I like this example. Now a question. Since the decker knows there is a gun, can he attempt to look for its silent running icon? From your example, the decker is assuming that of the two silent icons one of them is the gun. When the decker rolls his (opposed) perception test against the gun and fails he could assume that either the gun is better hidden than he thought or that it indeed does not have a hidden icon. But knowing that there is a gun and there are silent icons, would this be possible? The text does state that knowing an attribute of the icon allows this, and knowing that the gun should be generating an icon IMO should allow the roll. The decker knows there is a gun in the real world. The decker does not know it has a silent running icon, because obviously in the example it doesn't. You cannot filter icons by information you do not have, in this case you cannot select the running silent icon of the gun because you have no idea which one it could be if any. All you know is that it doesn't show an obvious icon, and there are running silent icons within 100m or the same host as you. Does that clear it up? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#137
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 681 Joined: 23-March 10 From: Japan Member No.: 18,343 ![]() |
Yup. So the only way to find an icon that is running silent is by random chance since you can not know anything about it until you've found it, even though the text says otherwise.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#138
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
Yup. So the only way to find an icon that is running silent is by random chance since you can not know anything about it until you've found it, even though the text says otherwise. Yup. I don't write the system, or edit it. In fact I'm pretty sure nobody edits it. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#139
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 413 Joined: 20-September 10 Member No.: 19,058 ![]() |
Sorry to jump into this 1/2 way through and it may have been already answered but couldn't the decker just rely on his AR overlay to help identify which nodes are worthy of investigation once he's detected them?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#140
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 681 Joined: 23-March 10 From: Japan Member No.: 18,343 ![]() |
Sorry to jump into this 1/2 way through and it may have been already answered but couldn't the decker just rely on his AR overlay to help identify which nodes are worthy of investigation once he's detected them? That's the thing. The perception test just says "there are 1500 silent nodes within 100m". It doesn't give you any more information than that, so your AR would not help in the situation. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#141
|
|
Horror ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,322 Joined: 15-June 05 From: BumFuck, New Jersey Member No.: 7,445 ![]() |
Which is frankly bollocks. If you detect hidden nodes, your AR overlay should show you their direction from you and rough distance.
So sewing 100 stealth RFIDs into your clothes might make it hard to find and hack your commlink, but it'll basically negate any concealment you may be in, well enough for shooters to make called shots to your face, and unquestionably well enough for spotters to call in mortar/drone/airstrike/artillery fire on your position. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#142
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 681 Joined: 23-March 10 From: Japan Member No.: 18,343 ![]() |
Which is frankly bollocks. If you detect hidden nodes, your AR overlay should show you their direction from you and rough distance. So sewing 100 stealth RFIDs into your clothes might make it hard to find and hack your commlink, but it'll basically negate any concealment you may be in, well enough for shooters to make called shots to your face, and unquestionably well enough for spotters to call in mortar/drone/airstrike/artillery fire on your position. I agree, however the book doesn't say that so we are left with broken rules. There are a lot of ways to fix this issue, but they would all be house rules until something official comes out to make a repair. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#143
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 732 Joined: 5-April 08 From: Ottawa, Canada Member No.: 15,847 ![]() |
If I turn on my cellphone's wireless, it will tell me how many networks are within range to connect to. It doesn't tell me where the router are, what type or model they are, or how close they are. It just informs me they exist. I'm thinking this is fairly synonymous. If I wanted to get more information, I'd have to really look at the router I'm trying to connect to.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#144
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
If I turn on my cellphone's wireless, it will tell me how many networks are within range to connect to. It doesn't tell me where the router are, what type or model they are, or how close they are. It just informs me they exist. I'm thinking this is fairly synonymous. If I wanted to get more information, I'd have to really look at the router I'm trying to connect to. From the way Running Silent is described, that would make sense to me as well. It's described as shutting a device down to minimal network activity, after all. So not putting off enough packets to let AR triangulate it, while still doing enough data transfer for a decker to determine -something- is there, makes sense to me. Admittedly, this is applying the way real world signals work to SR5 Matrix, which is inherently flawed as a discipline. I believe everyone is missing that other part of running silent: QUOTE (pg 235 Spotting Duration) Once you’ve spotted an icon in the Matrix, you continue to spot it even if it initiates silent running. So if you spot and icon you know information about it (such as "it is a firearm"). The owner switches it to silent running. You would lose that icon except you know something about that icon (because you spotted it before it went silent) therefore you continue to spot it or can re-find it without having to use the opposed test on it. I agree though, if you haven't spotted it before, you know nothing about it until you have passed the opposed test on the hidden icon. Ahah, that's the page reference I couldn't remember, thanks Forgarn! Rhat, there's the answer to your question right there. That line you will not shut up about is referring to exactly this. If you have spotted an icon before it goes into running silent, you can re-spot it with a Matrix Perception Test because you know something about it that will let you filter it out from the rest of the silent running icons. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#145
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
Lets assume that every non-hidden device, or at least a large percentage of them, have GPS enabled and know their exact coordinates.
Even at only 5% this still works, given how pervasive wirelessly enabled objects are in the setting. So this is a reasonable assumption. Let's also assume that icons in hidden mode are still broadcasting some kind of identifier. In fact, they'd have to, even in hidden mode, or there would be no test to find them: you would simply fail. Because they are observable after a matrix perception check, they must be broadcasting some kind of uniquely identifying information. So this is a reasonable assumption. Sleeze just means that it isn't volunteering position data, etc. etc. Furthermore, all wirelessly enabled devices must be capable of routing traffic to these hidden devices, or they would lose their matrix bonus when in hidden mode. This means that some kind of routing information is available and can be polled by other devices in the vicinity. Sleeze just means that the device itself won't respond to direct ping request. But if it has pinged other devices...then those devices know that it's inside mutual signal range (at a maximum distance of the non-hidden device's own broadcast range). If A, B, and C are true, then the following is also true: Any wireless device can approximate the location of another wireless device solely based on the known GPS coordinates of GPS enabled devices and whether or not a requested icon's UUID is within broadcast range and the size of the GPS enabled device's broadcast range. The more devices that have GPS enabled (A) the more accurate this approximation will be (you only need three that are in range, if their coverage overlap is small enough). (B and C simply allow the matrix to function at all.) Therefore there is enough information available to pinpoint hidden icons for an AR overlay without having to reach blindly into a bottomless bucket of hidden icons. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#146
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
Therefore there is enough information available to pinpoint hidden icons for an AR overlay without having to reach blindly into a bottomless bucket of hidden icons. Sure, but is the info being put out enough to be noticed by the user in the blizzard of other AR icons that is a walk down the street in SR5 terms? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#147
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#148
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#149
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#150
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
Actually, the Running Silent section is, well, silent on this point. Yeah, because you have to read about spotting, a couple paragraphs up the column on the same page. QUOTE Matrix Perception The Matrix has a lot of stuff in it. Cars, blenders, light switches, advertising RFIDs, hosts, and everything wireless and/or electronic. You need to be able to find your target in the galaxy of icons before you can start affecting it; finding an icon this way is called spotting it. Lucky for you, the Matrix is very helpful in finding things for you. You can automatically spot the icons of devices that are not running silent within 100 meters of your physical location. No matter where you are in the Matrix, your commlink or deck (or your living persona) only has its own antenna for wireless signals, so this distance is measured from your physical location no matter where you are in the Matrix. Beyond this distance, you need to make a Matrix Perception Test (p. 241) to find a specific icon. For all intents and purposes, there is no “physical” distance to any host in the Matrix. You can always spot a host from anywhere on the planet without a test, assuming the host isn’t running silent. You can always keep track of your marks, so you can spot an icon you have a mark on without a test, no matter the distance. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st June 2025 - 09:07 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.