IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Prisons and punishment, opening the books thats thrown
Nikoli
post May 25 2004, 12:28 PM
Post #76


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



And let us not forget, the implantation of a datajack, according to the BBB (IIRC) is not considered invasive. it's a 2 hours task on an outpatient basis, you walk in, your get the implant, you walk out and either have a stiff neck or a slight headache for a day or two. I've had more hassle getting new glasses.

Also, a projecting mage is not limited to communication. They are able to attack astral forms, possess and become more powerful (astral quests).

You could of course just run them through brain washing to fear projection on threat of death.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Abstruse
post May 25 2004, 12:45 PM
Post #77


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,451
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 4,488



Cruel and Unusual. I can say you can't use a computer during your probation, but I can't give you a lobotomy so you can't use a computer again. Hell, Kevin Mitnick's on the internet again.

If Single-A rated corps can afford wards, elementals, watchers, etc., why wouldn't a prison? Besides, why make every prison Mage-proof? You'd just need a couple of them. And you could always just ley very thick ivy grow around the cell walls.

The Abstruse One
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post May 25 2004, 12:59 PM
Post #78


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Just how many large, magical-security prisons would be required? Can someone more knowledgeable about the RL prison system give us some numbers? How many inmates are there in total? How many does an average prison hold? A large prison? I have no idea how many prisons are in the country. So how many large prisons would we need to contain (for simplicity's sake) 1% of the inmates?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wanderer
post May 25 2004, 02:50 PM
Post #79


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 6-September 02
Member No.: 3,234



QUOTE (TinkerGnome)
The resulting insanity may well be, however ;)

A big difference is that prolonged simsense incapacitation *may* give one insanity, while removal of magical ability is a sure thing. An even more overwhelming and pivotal difference is that by 2064, there are many effective treatments for insanity (drugs, psychotherapy, magical healing, psychotropic re-conditioning), while total magic loss is utterly incurable, short of subscribing to the Cult of Aleph (and I don't see governments very happy with the perspective of hordes of criminal ex-mages adhering en masse to a cult of rather dubious reputation).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Rodent of Unus...
post May 25 2004, 02:57 PM
Post #80


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 24-May 04
Member No.: 6,354



Unless they're using BTL or even CalHot levels of simsense, it shouldn't be much of an issue anyway. The simsense feed could even be of their everyday life, too. But since it's a simulation, there's nothing they can do to affect it with their magic.

I also have little doubt that by 2064 they'd have some medical means to tell when magic is being used, especially if a full simsense 'trode net was in use at the time. Heck, just putting some FAB-II in a ring around the head harness' neck that gets a regular refill, and then having sensors monitor the luminescence thereof, should be enough to send a warning to the jailers and/or trigger a KO drug or electric shock to incapacitate the prisoner.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post May 25 2004, 03:44 PM
Post #81


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



QUOTE (Wanderer)
QUOTE (TinkerGnome @ May 25 2004, 03:33 AM)
The resulting insanity may well be, however ;)

A big difference is that prolonged simsense incapacitation *may* give one insanity, while removal of magical ability is a sure thing.

So... you take the 99.9% of the population who don't frankly care that you can do magic (and, in fact, probably don't like mages much because they "think they're better than everyone else" or are terrified of their powers) and you ask them which is worse, a chance of going insane or not being able to do magic, and what do you think they'll say? They're the ones who make the laws that'll govern that mage if he, let's say, throws a few high force manaballs around on the street and kills thirty people.

What do you think they'll dictate is the appropriate method of handling that mage?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post May 25 2004, 03:47 PM
Post #82


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



A short trip down with a sudden stop I'd imagine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post May 25 2004, 03:59 PM
Post #83


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/prisons.htm
There you go.

2,033,331 inmates per year average in 2002. Take that and 1% of the total number of incarcerated persons that would be magically active would be 203,333 in any given year. Violent crimes convictions make up consistently nearly half of that. That's a whole freaking lot of prisoners.

while I'm at it, http://www.doc.state.nc.us/DOP/cost/cost2001.htm. That details the cost of housing each inmate in 2001.

That cost increases dramatically when the inmate requires dircect contact and monitoring, specifically medical.

Yes, I do work in a jail, for the LVMPD. This has been no hidden fact for the last few years I have posted here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post May 25 2004, 04:04 PM
Post #84


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



The number of mages would probably be lower than 1% of prison population simply because mages would, because of their abilities, tend to cluster higher on the socioeconomic spectrum than the general mishmash of mundane humanity.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post May 25 2004, 04:07 PM
Post #85


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



That's a very very bad assumption The world is full of morons with no ambition not living up to their potential. That doesnt change because they are magically active. Most people are ignorant and happy to stay that way. Magic would just be an easier path to crime. There would be a whole pile of incompetent half ass mages, just like now there are a whole pile of incompetent half ass humans.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post May 25 2004, 04:09 PM
Post #86


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



But most skillsets that would otherwise be unused generally aren't actively hunted for by pretty much every corporation out there.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post May 25 2004, 04:15 PM
Post #87


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



No, I realize that, but im trying to say that 80% of the people out there you don't WANT to give that amount of power to, that's a Bad Thing™! I'm saying that it's good on paper but its just a really bad idea in the real world. It's really hard to explain just how jackassed criminal mentality is without spending a decent amount of time around them. Most of them wouldn't do the work to keep a good paying job if it bit them on the ass. Its pretty damn frightening really.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post May 25 2004, 04:15 PM
Post #88


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Also, you don't tend to be knocked unconscious when trying to turnon your computer when you aren't a very proficient or ambitious new user. Magic however has a potentially far more significant darwin effect.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wanderer
post May 25 2004, 04:19 PM
Post #89


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 6-September 02
Member No.: 3,234



QUOTE (TinkerGnome)
QUOTE (Wanderer @ May 25 2004, 10:50 AM)
QUOTE (TinkerGnome @ May 25 2004, 03:33 AM)
The resulting insanity may well be, however ;)

A big difference is that prolonged simsense incapacitation *may* give one insanity, while removal of magical ability is a sure thing.

So... you take the 99.9% of the population who don't frankly care that you can do magic (and, in fact, probably don't like mages much because they "think they're better than everyone else" or are terrified of their powers) and you ask them which is worse, a chance of going insane or not being able to do magic, and what do you think they'll say? They're the ones who make the laws that'll govern that mage if he, let's say, throws a few high force manaballs around on the street and kills thirty people.

What do you think they'll dictate is the appropriate method of handling that mage?

The answer to this is that ther is no way in a democratic system with a decent degree of civil rule-of-law this kind of treatment could become the norm unless you remove *any* and *all* constitutional and law protections against inhuman punishment, and you sink the law system to the point where hand-cutting for thieves, castration for rapists, and death penalty for adultery or drug use are welcome back in codes. No matter how much you trump the "tough on crime" scare, people still want *some* legal protection from a law system of indiscriminate brutality.

And besides that, do you really think the public and law enforcement would welcome a system where *any* criminal mage is mightly encouraged to use maximum, indiscriminate amounts of deadly force against police and civilians because they know that if caught, they face a fate worse than death ??

You can certainly write the death penalty in codes for drug dealers. But be prepared for them to shoot the crowd at the drop of a hat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post May 25 2004, 04:29 PM
Post #90


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



There is a difference between Allowable punishment and maximum punishment.

just because the death penalty is available doesn't mean every criminal found guilty of it will be subjected to it.

You cannot rehabilitate a dead inmate. Every human being has an obligation to every other human being to be a productive member of society. Criminals are not productive members on the grand scale. They steal productivity from companies which directly steals money from everyone's pocket that does business with or for the companies.

Rehabilitate the criminal, show them there are options available to them that do not necessitate the use of violence on others to survive, that do not require underhanded or shady doings to get by and impress upon them the effects of the harm they have done to others and will do if they do not change their ways. If through all this a person does not respond, does not mend their ways, then society, to protect itself must remove them from the social group, such a person should be isolated from others, and given intensive education in basic reading and writing, taught a trade that will not make them a 'better criminal' and be put to work as productive persons (note I did not say citizens, inmates in a prison system do not and should not have the same rights and priveledges of a free law abiding citizen, to do otherwise invites criminal activity).

To ensure that a rehabilitated person is not coerced through social pressure to resume their criminal beghavior, society must strive to remove the stigma of 'ex-con'. History has taught us that people with such a past are given little opportunity to not return to teh old ways. They are repeatedly harrassed, they are shuned, they are denied work, yet we as a society are 'shocked' when they return to their crimnial behavior and we blame the system for failing us and them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post May 25 2004, 04:36 PM
Post #91


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



Inhumane? Try to convince a dozen mundane humans (ie, the Supreme Court of whatever its equivalent is) that making someone have the same magical ability as they personally possess is inhumane. If someone's above normal, cutting them down to normal is not inhumane.

I'd wager many folks would look at it much akin to laws which prevent felons from owning guns. Magic is a deadly weapon, and if you've used it that way once, you don't even need to aquire a new spell to use it that way twice. This is already supposing that the reformable mages (ie, those willing to work for the capturing corp or Lone Star, the government, etc) are taken out of the pool. I'm also not talking about a mage who goes down for tax evasion or the like. Violent felonies in which magic is the tool or an accessory seems to fit the bill pretty well.

I'd wager magically aggravated homicide would be a crime worthy of removal of all magic. How is knowing he might get turned mundane any worse than a life sentance in simsense prison? That'd be like saying that the three strikes laws generate more crime because the criminal knows he's going away for a long time if he gets caught (which, while possibly true, isn't a good reason not to use such laws or deterents).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Rodent of Unus...
post May 25 2004, 05:14 PM
Post #92


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 24-May 04
Member No.: 6,354



QUOTE
Inhumane? Try to convince a dozen mundane humans (ie, the Supreme Court of whatever its equivalent is) that making someone have the same magical ability as they personally possess is inhumane. If someone's above normal, cutting them down to normal is not inhumane.

It's on the exact same level as racism. By your comments, any American who isn't a caucasian with brown hair and brown eyes should have their skin bleached, their hair dyed, and their eyes altered so as to "cut them down to normal." In Shadowrun, trolls, orks, dwarves, and elves should all have to undergo drastic genetic modification so as to be "cut down to normal" when they're put in prison, too. And the best part of all, it's not "inhumane."

:please:

Likewise, anyone with an I.Q. above 100 needs to have a lobotomy. Anyone who can run faster than 12mph need to be partially crippled until they can only run 12mph. Anyone taller than 170cm should have their legs surgically altered so that they meet that "normal" height. Anyone weighing more than 70kg should have to undergo liposuction until they hit that weight. etc.

That's just ridiculous. It's inhumane to forcefully and permantely remove or deny anyone a natural, god-given ability they possess. Period. And I guarantee you that no sane magician in the Sixth World would back such a law, including fine, upstanding professionals and experts on the subject. Let alone lobbyists like the New Dawn.

It is nothing like owning a gun. It is nothing like hacking a computer. It's more like sawing off a criminal's hands so they can't shoot a gun. It's more like mentally handicapping them so that they don't even know what a computer is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post May 25 2004, 05:23 PM
Post #93


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



Society determines what is humane and what is not. There are many societies on earth, even know, who set the bar for inhumane acts much lower than even that. Sure, it seems inhumane to treat people of different races (even metatypes when you consider SR) differently than others, but there are places and times where that's perfectly fine. People get funny ideas about how to handle those different from themselves.

If you don't have a frame of reference for what someone is going to loose, you're less likely to think it inhumane. Virtually everyone can understand what it would be like to loose a limb or to become less intelligent... only .1% of the population can comprehend the loss of magical power.

Would a kingdom of blind men who had never been anything other than blind think it inhumane to make a sighted person blind? They don't understand what "sight" is, so to them, it's no different than having a baby's vestigal tail removed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post May 25 2004, 05:24 PM
Post #94


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I could see things like this happening immediately post-Awakening or post-Goblinization. By the time the '40s roll around, though, it should be a thing of the past.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post May 25 2004, 05:32 PM
Post #95


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



While I'll agree that it's probably less common in the '60s than shortly after the Awakening, I'd say it's still on the books as a possible sentance. Quite probably akin to the way the death penalty is handled now.

And really, if you're talking about magically aggravated homicide by a person that the corps can't use (or refuses to be used), what other real options are there? I suppose you could implant a chipjack and given them a personafix as an effective deterent against reincarceration.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post May 25 2004, 05:34 PM
Post #96


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE
It's on the exact same level as racism. By your comments, any American who isn't a caucasian with brown hair and brown eyes should have their skin bleached, their hair dyed, and their eyes altered so as to "cut them down to normal."
being caucasion, having died hair, a certain color eyes or any other normal physical feature does not greant you the ability to mentally rape people nor kill with a thought. Comparing the two is wholly baseless.

QUOTE
In Shadowrun, trolls, orks, dwarves, and elves should all have to undergo drastic genetic modification so as to be "cut down to normal" when they're put in prison, too. And the best part of all, it's not "inhumane."
Try make an argument that does not rely on you grossly exaggerating the circumstances to make your own case and I will offer a reply.

QUOTE
Likewise, anyone with an I.Q. above 100 needs to have a lobotomy. Anyone who can run faster than 12mph need to be partially crippled until they can only run 12mph. Anyone taller than 170cm should have their legs surgically altered so that they meet that "normal" height. Anyone weighing more than 70kg should have to undergo liposuction until they hit that weight. etc.
Someone has been reading too much Harrison Bergeron Again, Not one of those defining traits can be compared to the ability to kill someone invisibly with your mind, just by looking at them, and have it be untraceable to more than 99% of the population. It's comparing Apples and Testacles.

QUOTE
That's just ridiculous. It's inhumane to forcefully and permantely remove anyone a natural, god-given ability they possess. Period. And I guarantee you that no sane magician in the Sixth World would back such a law, including fine, upstanding professionals and experts on the subject. Let alone lobbyists like the New Dawn.
Canon shadowrun proves this wrong as this is explicitly listed as an option that can be exercised. Therefore it has been found not to be cruel nor unusual, but it may be considered by many to be extreme, it is absolutely not prohibited. People did therefore back that, as it has been upheld. Keep in mind also that the political atmosphere in SR is not necessarily in the same mindset as today. Attitudes twards things change. Mundanes are the vast majority.

QUOTE
It is nothing like owning a gun. It is nothing like hacking a computer. It's more like saying off their arms so they can't shoot a gun. It's more like mentally handicapping them so that they don't even know what a computer is.
You're right, it's not like owning a gun or using a computer, but likewise it is not like cutting off someone's arms nor mentally handicapping them. It is a unique case that doesn't really have a paralell to anything in present day. I haven't seen a single analogy that would actually wotk for this issue because of the nature of it.

Remember, just because You think that losing magic is a fate worse than death doesn't mean that most mages will. Even after magic is removed they still posess all their magical knowledge. They can still work as consultants and offer unique outlooks based on their experiences that no normal mundanes can, they can still do spell and formula design ect. They still would be fully functional normal mundane human beings.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wanderer
post May 25 2004, 05:48 PM
Post #97


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 6-September 02
Member No.: 3,234



QUOTE (TinkerGnome @ May 25 2004, 06:23 PM)
Society determines what is humane and what is not.  There are many societies on earth, even know, who set the bar for inhumane acts much lower than even that.  Sure, it seems inhumane to treat people of different races (even metatypes when you consider SR) differently than others, but there are places and times where that's perfectly fine.  People get funny ideas about how to handle those different from themselves.

If you don't have a frame of reference for what someone is going to loose, you're less likely to think it inhumane.  Virtually everyone can understand what it would be like to loose a limb or to become less intelligent... only .1% of the population can comprehend the loss of magical power. 

Would a kingdom of blind men who had never been anything other than blind think it inhumane to make a sighted person blind?  They don't understand what "sight" is, so to them, it's no different than having a baby's vestigal tail removed.


We're assuming that we are talking about societies with a minimum level of modren decency in jurisprudence and civic consciousness, like UCAS, CAS; most of NAN and Europe. Probably in the 2064 equivalent of Taleban Afghanistan you can get away with that and much more.

As for common people not having any idea of what being a a magician is like, that's ludicrous. Magic is widespread in society and in popular culture. If any, popular media give an inflated idea of the amount of power at a mage's fingertips, so the loss looks even more severe.

Hell, *I* don't live in the SR universe, yet I have a rather firm idea of the value of magic ability in the SR world, so much that I'd rather prefer being gunned down by the police than being forcibly reduced to a mundane in prison.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post May 25 2004, 05:54 PM
Post #98


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



Again, while everyone might know what a mage can do, or even have some idea of what being a mage is like, does that make them sympathetic or even make them understand what it means to loose that?

I get the feeling that a mage who couldn't do magic anymore would get precious little sympathy from those who have never and will never be able to do magic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Rodent of Unus...
post May 25 2004, 06:02 PM
Post #99


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 24-May 04
Member No.: 6,354



QUOTE
QUOTE
In Shadowrun, trolls, orks, dwarves, and elves should all have to undergo drastic genetic modification so as to be "cut down to normal" when they're put in prison, too. And the best part of all, it's not "inhumane."

Try make an argument that does not rely on you grossly exaggerating the circumstances to make your own case and I will offer a reply.

It's only an exageration because it's true. Trolls can use their insane Strength, Reach, and Dermal Armor to inflict some serious hurting. Since they're far beyond "normal" levels of Strength, Reach, and Dermal Armor, they should have those removed so that they become "normal" humans. Afterall, they still end up being fully functional by normal standards.

It is exactly the same thing with magic. Even moreso since the same thing that sparked trolls sparked magic.

QUOTE
Someone has been reading too much Harrison Bergeron Again, Not one of those defining traits can be compared to the ability to kill someone invisibly with your mind, just by looking at them, and have it be untraceable to more than 99% of the population. It's comparing Apples and Testacles.

No they haven't.

And, once again, your theories on how magic should be stripped away applies to any magician put behind bars. *ANY.* Including those who didn't use magic in any way, shape, or form to commit their crimes. Even if those crimes include something as pedestrian as credit fraud, tax evasion, or just not paying your car tickets.

But they're magicians! There's only 30,000 of them in Seattle alone, so surely they're an exception to the rule! So what if there's non-evasive and non-permanent ways to restrain their magical abilities? Screw that. Violate and rape their bodies, strip away their magic forever, and leave them crippled (see definition #2). You're clutching to the fact that normal people don't have magic is asinine and ridiculous. Just because a *huge* portion of the population (there are far more magicians than there are doctors or even lawyers) have abilities that the majority do not does not mean that stripping them of those abilities is not crippling them. It's only some strange, bizarre defintion of the word used only in your mind that says otherwise.

QUOTE
Canon shadowrun proves this wrong as this is explicitly listed as an option that can be exercised. Therefore it has been found not to be cruel nor unusual, but it may be considered by many to be extreme, it is absolutely not prohibited. People did therefore back that, as it has been upheld. Keep in mind also that the political atmosphere in SR is not necessarily in the same mindset as today. Attitudes twards things change. Mundanes are the vast majority.

BZZT! Wrong.

The exact quote is "Some jurisditions use drug treatments or radical surgery to permanenty remove a magical criminal's ability to use magic." That does not necessarily apply to any country like the UCAS. Just like today, some countries and "jurisdictions" believe in castration or even chopping off someone's hands are perfectly acceptable punishments for criminals. That in no way means it's not cruel or unusual, let alone humane, by the majority. Especially since the same text goes on to specify that it is *NOT* the norm. And even where it is excepted, it's a last-case option used only in extreme cases and is on the same level as the death penalty. Translation: Performing the surgery or drug treatment is on the exact same level as killing a person.

QUOTE
Remember, just because You think that losing magic is a fate worse than death doesn't mean that most mages will.

I can't even begin to comment on this line. It's patently absurd.

QUOTE
Even after magic is removed they still posess all their magical knowledge. They can still work as consultants and offer unique outlooks based on their experiences that no normal mundanes can, they can still do spell and formula design ect. They still would be fully functional normal mundane human beings.

But they wouldn't be the fully functional normal magicians they were.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neon Tiger
post May 25 2004, 07:24 PM
Post #100


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 1-April 02
From: Finland, Iisalmi
Member No.: 2,497



Ok, joke time:

. <- This is your @$$hole.
O <- This is your @$$hole in prison.


But, seriously how about building mage-only prison something like 10-20 meters underground, as it is very hard to go through the Earth in astral form. Then just put a few wards in the elevator shaft to stop anyone going through there. No need for that Awakened ivy or FAB or something very expensive like that.

As for using simsense loops or anything that deprives senses, that's a very good way to make someone completely insane. And after that insane guy get freed, he's probably going to some crowded place and start casting Extented-Area Fireballs in the crowd. Or do something like that.

Using drones and such to take care of the inmates would be rather good way, as highly technological things are really hard affect with magic.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 07:36 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.