IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Do you want the Shadowrun game to do well?
Do you want the new Shadowrun game to do well?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 110
Guests cannot vote 
emo samurai
post Nov 26 2006, 08:10 PM
Post #1


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



This isn't a question of whether the game rocks or not. It's a question of whether you want it to succeed. I am divide, so I won't vote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanegar
post Nov 26 2006, 08:19 PM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,654
Joined: 29-October 06
Member No.: 9,731



I was very excited when I learned that another Shadowrun video game was coming out, but my excitement died screaming when I learned that it was going to another frelling multiplayer shooter. It's an unconscionable waste of the license, IMO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Nov 26 2006, 08:20 PM
Post #3


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



I think you should probably make it clear that you are refering to the Shadowrun Video Game, and not the RPG itself.

Of course, that isn't necessary now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Nov 26 2006, 08:37 PM
Post #4


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636




Although I try not to be so small hearted as to wish their game to do badly, my initial reaction to it is one of offense. Shadowrun has a rich and evocative background with a very distinctive feel to it. So why bother using the name if you're going to throw all of that away? The only reason that comes to mind is to capitalise on the name. If you're merely exploiting something's name to sell something different then I think most of us would agree that this a poor thing to do. Worse, it can tar the image of the RPG when people mentally associate it with a poor FPS.

For those reasons, I dislike it. I'm forbidden from actually wishing failure on the game by my morality, but I find it hard to wish it well at present.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post Nov 26 2006, 08:58 PM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



I wish failure on it. The last thing I want is a group of kids asking me why I play an RPG based on a first person shooter. I would have to kill them. I hope it just dissappears from the memory of everyone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 26 2006, 09:01 PM
Post #6


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I want it to fail. My reaction is based on both spite and rationality—the spite comes from what the game is, and the rational desire comes from what organization profits by the sales.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Protagonist
post Nov 26 2006, 09:03 PM
Post #7


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-April 06
Member No.: 8,459



I sort of hope it does well, even though it looks like crap, in the hopes that better Shadowrun related video games could come of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Konsaki
post Nov 26 2006, 09:11 PM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,526
Joined: 9-April 06
From: McGuire AFB, NJ
Member No.: 8,445



If a crappy game does well, then they will produce more crappy games...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Nov 26 2006, 09:21 PM
Post #9


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Tanegar)
I was very excited when I learned that another Shadowrun video game was coming out, but my excitement died screaming when I learned that it was going to another frelling multiplayer shooter. It's an unconscionable waste of the license, IMO.

It's not a waste of the license for that reason -- they have the rights to do more than one game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
krayola red
post Nov 26 2006, 09:32 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 12-August 06
Member No.: 9,097



I hope it does well. It's coming out regardless of whether or not anyone likes it, and if it ends up being popular, it'll draw people to the Shadowrun franchise. If it crashes and burns, that failure would be associated with the Shadowrun name in the minds of anyone who knows of it. And hell, it's not like I have any personal stake in the issue, so why not give 'em a godspeed?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Nov 26 2006, 09:49 PM
Post #11


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Adam)
It's not a waste of the license for that reason -- they have the rights to do more than one game.

that's why it's a waste. if they do a game that sells badly, no more SR video games will be made for a while. if they do a non-SR game and slap the SR name on it, and it does well, there still won't be any SR video games made for a while--they'll all be "SR" video games.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Nov 26 2006, 10:06 PM
Post #12


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



I don't think we'll get SR game now, no matter what. If this "SR" game tanks, I still doubt Microsoft will sell the license to someone else, and even if they would be willing, it will have hurt the value of the license in the eyes of other companies, too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 26 2006, 10:20 PM
Post #13


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



So you're saying that only people who are insane can be discharged from the army, and only those who ask for an insanity discharge can be evaluated for one, but anyone who wants to be discharged due to insanity is automatically deemed sane because only an insane person would want to stay in the army?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorechaser
post Nov 26 2006, 11:09 PM
Post #14


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9,168



I guess I'm in the minority when I think the game is close enough to SR to count.

I mean, the old games had mage with full ware running around.

Fundamentally, what does this game do wrong?

It mucks with the races some. I'm okay with that - it's close-ish, and makes a good system from what I've read.

It breaks the timeline a bit. Ehh. I played Star Wars Galaxies. I'm immune to concerns about breaking the timeline.

It's a first person shooter. So is Morrowind, and Dark Messiah of Might and Magic, to some extent. I imagine mods coming out to make a Morrowind style experience. And from what I've read, it does a lot to mess with the normal FPS genre. So it becomes "that wierd fps that was based on that one game."

Maybe people will come to the pen and paper game expecting something different. They'll still come....

I would die happy if Bioware took over SR and made a Knights of the Old Republic quality game. But I'm willing to give this one a chance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Nov 26 2006, 11:20 PM
Post #15


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Adam)
I don't think we'll get SR game now, no matter what. If this "SR" game tanks, I still doubt Microsoft will sell the license to someone else, and even if they would be willing, it will have hurt the value of the license in the eyes of other companies, too.

oh, yeah, i agree. i just think that it's a waste of the license whether they're able to produce more than one game or not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Nov 26 2006, 11:23 PM
Post #16


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
So you're saying that only people who are insane can be discharged from the army, and only those who ask for an insanity discharge can be evaluated for one, but anyone who wants to be discharged due to insanity is automatically deemed sane because only an insane person would want to stay in the army?

Sounds about right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Nov 27 2006, 12:08 PM
Post #17


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



I voted No, but my reasoning is not based on deviation from canon. The license should have gone to Bioware, but that was not to be.


This use of the license is very unprofessional, and therefore they should fail. They paid for the rights to use the SR background, yet they neither use the strength (ultra-cool tech + magic as different ways to power), nor do they market the game to the shadowrun fan. SR does not gain by this game, but so doesn´t Microsoft, who could have made this game without buying the license.

The game might become a good shooter, but the economist is offended at the thought that the only possible gain they had from buying the license is stopping someone competent from making good use of the license. Market denial is an ugly strategy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Konsaki
post Nov 27 2006, 12:16 PM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,526
Joined: 9-April 06
From: McGuire AFB, NJ
Member No.: 8,445



Real life corp warfare... Welcome to Shadowrun 200X... :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lindt
post Nov 27 2006, 02:41 PM
Post #19


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



Sr could have worked as an fps. No question in my mind. However, this is Battlefield 2026, not a proper fps/rpg (in the Deus Ex style that would have worked so damm well). Thus I wish it horrible failure, never minding that its MS.

Lets face it, MS has done nothing but crap on all of FAFSA's old licenses. Crimson Skys was a flop. Mechwarrior would be a flop if it wasent A) so damm easy or B) cheep. And now SR is being perverted into JACTF (just another capture the flag). Besides, from the release dates its going to be in competition with Halo 3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Nov 27 2006, 03:01 PM
Post #20


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



I voted yes. It might have been better as a Splinter Cellish stealth shooter, but SR where I live has been dying.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 27 2006, 03:11 PM
Post #21


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Lindt)
FAFSA

The Free Application for Federal Student Aid?

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorechaser
post Nov 27 2006, 03:48 PM
Post #22


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9,168



I liked Crimson Skies! And it got tons of good reviews. It just didn't do that great in sales.

I'm going to continue to watch the game, and see what happens. It's also possible that MS sat down and looked at the idea of releasing an RPG out of the gate and said "Yeah, this game is pretty weird - I'm not sure anyone but the true fans would really pick it up. Maybe we can start out with something more accessible, then move on to the other games once we see how people respond to it."

I mean, you can say a lot of nasty things about MS, but "You're pretty bad at marketing" really isn't one of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Nov 27 2006, 03:57 PM
Post #23


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Lindt)
Lets face it, MS has done nothing but crap on all of FAFSA's old licenses. Crimson Skys was a flop. Mechwarrior would be a flop if it wasent A) so damm easy or B) cheep.

i really have to disagree with you. the Mechwarrior games have been, as far as i can tell, pretty popular. they're not the games that everyone slavers in anticipation for, necessarily, but that's more due to the genre than the games themselves. and as for Crimson Skies, where have you been? it's still popular on XBox Live. that game is fun as hell--one of the reasons i got an XBox in the first place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanegar
post Nov 27 2006, 04:27 PM
Post #24


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,654
Joined: 29-October 06
Member No.: 9,731



QUOTE (mfb)
...as for Crimson Skies, where have you been? it's still popular on XBox Live. that game is fun as hell--one of the reasons i got an XBox in the first place.

Lindt may be referring to the PC game, which preceded the Xbox game. I think it's brilliant, but it didn't do well in sales.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 27 2006, 05:01 PM
Post #25


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (lorechaser)
I mean, you can say a lot of nasty things about MS, but "You're pretty bad at marketing" really isn't one of them.

Zune.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th February 2025 - 08:18 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.