![]() ![]() |
Jul 31 2007, 09:33 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 6-May 07 Member No.: 11,609 |
I'm new at this Shadowrun stuff and GMing, and I've had a few questions about magic things. I hope I can ask all of them in this post and not have to bother everyone after this, but... Here goes.
First, the Shamanic Mask. The only thing the RAW says about it is that some magical traditions have it, and it makes it easier for others to notice that the mage is casting spells. (+2 dice to perception test). What determines whether or not your mage has a shamanic mask -- is it just possessing a mentor spirit? Is the shamanic mask then just a disadvantage built into having a mentor spirit? Then I have a question about the Heal spell. It says the Drain value is (Damage Value) -2. What is the Damage Value, is it the number of boxes of Physical damage the target has taken? Or is it the number of boxes the mage is trying to heal? Since you use the Drain value to determine how long you must concentrate to make the healing permanent, it could make a big difference. Thanks for all help you can provide. |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:09 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 7,999 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,890 |
Shamanic Masks: This is a trait of the Shamanic Tradition (SR4 p. 170) and is assumed to exist whenever a Shaman uses their magic. It's only really noticable when they throw out high Force magic, however. But it's only really really noticable when someone succeeds at on the Notice Spellcasting test. Other traditions with a mentor spirit do not have a Shamanic Mask, though, unless they specifically mention it in their description.
Heal: Yes, the Damage Value it's referring to is the total number of boxes the target currently has (not total damage healed). It's completely separate from the amount of damage the spell actually heals. And yes, the duration required to make the effect varies based on the Drain Value. So if someone has five boxes of Physical Damage, the Drain Value is based off those five boxes even if the spell only heals two. |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:13 AM
Post
#3
|
|||
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
That's how I rule it: It only shows it you actually use your mentor spirit boni when doing magic. |
||
|
|
|||
Jul 31 2007, 10:53 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
IIRC its up to the shaman if he wants to have a mask. Major coolness, but less sneaky. Rotbarts suggestion is a middle ground I could live with.
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 04:30 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 |
Personally I even allow non-shamans to have one if they want, but then again I figure that a semi-invisable "mask-like" effect is part of what mundanes are actually sensing when they make the perception test to detremine if they notice who is casting magic.
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 06:43 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 |
A 5 BP negative quality "Shamanic Mask" would be a perfect buyoff for the Mentor Spirit quality.
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:03 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Technomancer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
That's not a bad idea, Buster....
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:08 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Genuine Artificial Intelligence ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
If you want to make it even more tempting, you could make an alternate Mentor Spirit w/ shamanic mask as a 0 point quality.
Same final cost but doesn't contribute to the 35 point limit on qualities. That is, if you wanted to make the shamanic mask even more tempting without actually changing the cost from what was already suggested. |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:19 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 6-May 07 Member No.: 11,609 |
Thanks for the feedback, omaes.
...and that's another question, how do you pronounce "omae?" I've been sticking with "chummer" just because I don't know. |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:21 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Oh-may. :D
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:22 AM
Post
#11
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 116 Joined: 5-May 02 From: Sydney Sprawl Member No.: 2,687 |
I have always pronounced it OH-MAY (like the month or something you might yell out when you are with May…). I could be wrong though. -Strobe |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 1 2007, 06:57 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
Depends.
Colloquial among more or less equals, it's a diphthong -- o-mah-e (as in "air"). Try for pure vowels in each part (difficult for native English speakers, I've found). A slightly ruder variant is omee -- o-me (again as in "air", but lengthened). Both are slightly iffy for women: the original intent is to an equal or light subordinate, with the "o" prefix "polite-ening" it. |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:00 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 7,999 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,890 |
How are you translating "e" or "me" into sounding anything even remotely like "air?" I'm just not getting it.
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:02 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
How would you pronounce the "e" in "effing", or "endure", or "men"?
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:07 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 7,999 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,890 |
"A soft E," "eh," or by using any of the examples you just cited. :) Thanks for the clarification, I didn't understand what you meant. :D
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:21 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 5-June 03 Member No.: 4,689 |
It's the nasty thing, in English, about just saying "it's pronounced like an 'e'." Even soft "e" wouldn't completely cover it ... and very technically, the "e" sound in those examples isn't the same.
But, as the professor explaining Xeno's paradox using a male and female co-ed said, it's close enough for practical purposes. |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 02:05 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 6-May 07 Member No.: 11,609 |
Thanks for the replies -- here's another question I had, concerning casting from astral projection:
If I'm reading the RAW correctly, p 173, an astrally projecting magician can cast spells on things with an astral presence only (including dual-natured characters/critters). They cannot cast spells on targets in the physical world at all. I have been telling my player that he can cast spells on physical beings if he manifests (p 184, an astral form can interact with the physical plane if it manifests, though it cannot make physical attacks) -- after re-reading p173 though, I think I was wrong about this, and the astral caster can't cast spells on the physical plane at all, even when manifesting. Which is right -- can they cast spells on purely physical forms when manifesting, or no? |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 02:12 AM
Post
#18
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 410 Joined: 5-April 07 From: Vancouver, BC Member No.: 11,383 |
The answer would be no. They are still astral and can only effect astral even when manifesting. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 14 2007, 02:15 AM
Post
#19
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 |
Sort of. The astral caster can target anyone using astral perception or who is dual natured. However, that spell does not "ground" into the physical plane, it attacks that dual natured being only. In other words, if the astral mage tosses an area-effect fireball at an astrally perceiving adept, only the adept gets hit even though his (non-astrally active) cybersam buddy is standing right next to him. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 14 2007, 02:21 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 |
Also, remember that manifesting is not the same thing as materializing. Manifesting is a purely astral phenomena. Materializing is only for spirits with the Materializing power. A materialized spirit would cast spells into the physical plane, but a manifested spirit would cast spells into the astral plane.
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 03:13 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,379 Joined: 16-April 02 From: the LI shadows Member No.: 2,607 |
OK, how does one pronounce "corp" when refering to Corporations? Is the 'p' at the end silent or not? (and you can just forget the obvious jokes that brings up, tyvm)
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 03:31 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
With p.
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 04:24 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 |
Fun with English:
Corps (more than one corp) is pronounced "corps". Army Corps or Corps cadaver is pronounced "core". Corpse (as in a dead body) is pronounced "corps". And don't get me started on the tomb/comb/bomb nonsense. Harry Harrison promised we'd all be speaking Esperanto by now! |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2007, 08:23 AM
Post
#24
|
|||
|
Mystery Archaeologist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,906 Joined: 19-September 05 From: The apple tree Member No.: 7,760 |
Damn our languages creolised routes. Thats a proper linguistic term that.
Pretty much right bar one point. When in astral you can only cast Mana spells, Fireball is Physical. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 15 2007, 02:04 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,379 Joined: 16-April 02 From: the LI shadows Member No.: 2,607 |
Thanks. :)
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st May 2026 - 10:09 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.