Yet another ammo type out there |
Yet another ammo type out there |
Dec 5 2003, 10:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,512 Joined: 16-August 03 From: Northampton Member No.: 5,499 |
Nasty NEW bullet
Read this, shocking. No doubt raygun knows/ would like this. Side note how do i rename the link? |
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:10 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Validating Posts: 7,999 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,890 |
<url=http://wherever.com>This Is The Link</url>
Just like that, replacing the <>s with []s. |
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:10 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Bloody hell.
As to fixing the link, I'd suggest hitting the edit button and naming the link: Nasty New Bullet. Ouch. -Siege |
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|||
Target Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 13-November 03 Member No.: 5,820 |
This is one of the most amusing sentances I've read in a long time. Damn, that thing sounds nasty. There were some references (maybe in Fields of Fire or Cybertechnology?) to explosive APDS ammo in the Shadowrun universe. If we can accept for a moment that APDS ammo somehow fits in a SMG, I wonder if that would be the best translation for this round. EDIT: As interesting as the article is, the comments attached to it are worth reading too--it might not be the wonder bullet after all. |
||
|
|||
Dec 5 2003, 10:19 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
Holy... Ouch! That's one reason why I'll never join the Armed Forces. Fragging new bullet technology...
|
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:29 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Edinburgh, Scotland Member No.: 2,032 |
Jeezus look at what it does to that slab of meat!
This is really just a link to one of the pages linked from that page but I missed it the first time so I think others might have... |
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:39 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
Jesus Christ! Mother of God!
|
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:44 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Edinburgh, Scotland Member No.: 2,032 |
I suppose the question is: How good is it at penetrating kevlar? AFAIK normal bullets can be stopped by a kavlar vest, why would the fact that these bullets are made out of blended metals make them fare any better?
|
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 10:54 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
Hamburger, anyone?
Kevlar is better than, say, nothing when dealing with most small-caliber bullets. I don't know enough about this "blended metal" to know if it could penetrate...I mean, I don't think the wounds are caused by hydrostatic pressure bursting the flesh, and certainyl the penetration at normal speeds wouldn't do it. There's no explosive tip. It does have a smaller diameter tip, but that shouldn't make this much of a difference. |
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 11:27 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
This round was discussed here some time ago. Lemme dig up the link for ya...
Here. It's not as good as it's made to sound. It's just hype, sounds an awful lot like the "teflon coated copkiller bullet" syndrome. It doesn't penetrate armor any better than existing dedicated armor piercing rounds. Currently there doesn't seem to be any objective research into how the bullet really work, so be critical when reading that stuff. Lilt, NATO standard 5.56x45mm FMJ rounds are not stopped by kevlar vests at short ranges. I'd be very surprised if this round was -- that would mean it penetrated soft body armor far worse than FMJ rounds. The large wound cavities are supposedly created because the bullet fragments as soon as it hits something soft. At best, if it works exactly like the makers claim it does, it might work like an armor piercing penetrator when hitting something hard (like armor) and then fragment when hitting flesh. Obviously, the technology has several downsides, as discussed in the thread I linked. If it didn't, everyone would be using it... |
|
|
Dec 5 2003, 11:45 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
If this really is as great as it sounds, then just add the equivalent of a few layers of drywall to body armor. Boom, it no longer penetrates. I'm not particularly familiar with drywall, but I'm pretty sure that'd be lighter than plates to stop conventional rounds.
~J |
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 12:45 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Deus Absconditus Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,742 Joined: 1-September 03 From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS Member No.: 5,566 |
I don't think so. Hard armor plates such as in the US military flak gear are generally made of titanium, as far as I recall. Drywall's an assload heavier than titanium. I don't remember exactly what it's made of, but it looks and feels like compressed chalk dust - i.e. it's dense as hell.
Plus, an average sheet of drywall is 3/4s of an inch to an inch thick. That's some pretty thick 'additive' plating to an already heavy vest. I'm not impugning the idea... just impugning the use of drywall specifically. |
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 12:47 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
And drywall cracks really easily. I think it's a variant of concrete.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 01:18 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,156 Joined: 15-March 03 From: Fresno, CalFree Member No.: 4,252 |
They use it to make walls...It's pretty sturdy, but you can punch through it. I can.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 01:20 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
Or hit it too hard with your knee. Or lean back too hard.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 01:37 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Actually, if you need to stop that kind of bullet, put 2+ inches of ballistic gelatin outside your armored vest. The bullet will fragment in the gelatin, and then hit the vest in pieces. Result: Zero penetration. And ballistic gelatin is pretty darn light compared to any body armor material.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 01:40 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 30-January 03 From: Redlands, CA Member No.: 3,996 |
This ammunition brings a new meaning to fragged, looks like what a hollow-point shotgun slug would do. I figure this ammunition where it to be put into SR terms would probably have the following effects: Increase damage level by one, 1/2 ballistic rating.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 01:55 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
The whole of the end part of the article describes how the president of sales and manufacturing of the firm that makes these rounds is trying to say that "Dude, our rounds are totally sweet", while objective testing says "Well, they have some potential, but they aren't very special".
And frankly, I'm more willing to believe the objective testers than the PR guy. Automatically believing what this guy Bulmer says about the rounds is like automatically believing what Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf said about the war in Iraq. So, for the time being, I wouldn't say this ammunition brings a new meaning to fragged. Not considering how completely you can already mess up a person with the kinds of bullets around. If you really think this round rocks and you want it for SR (assuming of course then that these rounds aren't the standard even though they rock so much), +2 Power with -25% Ranges or +1 DL/½ armor with -50% Ranges sounds rather good, with Misc Weird Shit Effects, like not being able to shoot through anything non-solid. Also, I find it hilarious that the pro-RBCD guys are saying that shooting the rounds into gelatin won't work because ballistic gelatin is not enough like flesh, but somehow artists' clay works... |
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 02:57 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
i suppose it's possible that the round has better fragmentation qualities against a 98-degree target than a 36-degree one--but on the other hand, what happens if you use the round in cold weather? are they going to start issuing seperate temperate and cold-weather ammo, the way they do with BDUs? (that's rhetorical.)
i do want to see the test results that claim the round will punch through steel, but shatter into flesh. |
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 03:25 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,458 Joined: 22-March 03 From: I am a figment of my own imagination. Member No.: 4,302 |
I'm still snickering at the lethal ass shot...
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 05:40 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,138 Joined: 10-June 03 From: Tennessee Member No.: 4,706 |
I'm more interested in those intelligent rounds that've been coming out of Mexico lately. Apparently, they're capable of piercing most body armors by making "decisions" at impact on how to deform.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 05:46 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Mostly Harmless Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 937 Joined: 26-February 02 From: 44.662,-63.469 Member No.: 176 |
My advice on this matter would be not to believe everything you read. Exploding meat does not necessarily equal penetrated armor and then exploded meat. Entertaining videos of exploding meat and other fun stuff can be found here.
|
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 06:15 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 588 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 227 |
Did I miss something, or are they sellign what amounts to a "glaser" round for rifles? I'm not sure what gives it the improve penetration on hard materials, but body armors aren't generally hard materials anyhow, so I don;t see it being any more useful in SR terms than a normal glaser. Maybe it would work better when you want to penetrate certain barrier types (/action twirl finger).
Anyhow, with SR's (thankfully optional) "SOTA" rules, these bullets would be incable of harming a fly if you were to buy them now and save them until 2063. ;) |
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 06:35 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
SOTA: Running to Stand Still. Coming to gaming tables worldwide.
~J |
|
|
Dec 6 2003, 12:39 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Mongoose, they're definitely not Glaser rounds. The actual metal supposedly fragments when it hits flesh, it doesn't have any separate material inside the jacket for that effect. And it's supposed to stay intact against anything solid, which if true would give it decent armor penetration properties.
They're saying it stays intact against anything solid, which soft body armor is. But I wonder if it's even been tested against body armor anywhere. At least I haven't seen any reference in any of the articles, even the ones where LeMas is going on about how überkewl these rounds are. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd December 2024 - 11:11 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.