Does Background Count make your spirits dumb?, "Durr, astral radiation make Fire Spirit think like Krunk"... Options Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic Download this topic Subscribe to this forum Display Modes Switch to: Outline Switch to: Standard Linear+

[Particle_Beam]

Mana Static is a spell that creates Background Count, right? Background Count makes that the Force of Astral Beings gets reduced, is that also true? The mental and physical stats and the skills of an astral being is determined by its Force. So, when a Spirit enters a place with Background Count (not aspected toward the tradition the Spirit hails from), do his skills and his mental attributes reduce too, because his Force Attribut go down? Or do they still stay the same. Like, what's the stats for a Force 6 Spirit of Man, for example, if he happens to be in a Background 4-place?
Are his spellcasting skill and his mental and physical attributes still the same with exception of the Force-attribut? Or do they all get down, so that he gets doubly penalized for his spellcasting skill (which does use Magic = Force as Added Attribut Dice-Pool), and he suddenly becomes as dumb as the morons at Box Networks from Futurama?

Thank you in advance. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

[Aaron]

Remind me: does background count reduce the Force attribute or the Magic attribute? I don't have a copy of Street Magic in front of me, but I think it's on or around page 119.

[CollateralDynamo]

pg. 118 of Street Magic:

Spirits, being creatures of living
mana, are perhaps even more
vulnerable to background count.
A spirit’s Force is reduced in the
same manner as a character’s Magic,
thus affecting the spirit’s attribute
and spirit powers as well

So, this would seem to say, that yes, they do indeed get dumb.

[CanRay]

Probably not so much makes them stupider, but distracts them, preventing them from bringing forth their true capabilities.

Like trying to write an exam in College with a Hangover.

[FrankTrollman]

They literally diminish. If the background count is high enough, they become outright disrupted.

-Frank

[Aaron]

Behold the power of research.

[CanRay]

OK, I'm obviously batting 0.000 today. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)

Sorry folks, I'll shut up, get the dunce cap cybernetically intstalled into my cyberskull, and sit in the corner...

[Larme]

Keep in mind though that having a low score does not make you disabled. Someone with 1 int and 1 log is indeed a dumbass, but that doesn't mean they're mentally retarded. Anything that wouldn't require a roll they can do flawlessly. Simple commands that would not demand a roll for a smart spirit to understand do not require a roll for a dumb spirit either. It's just nuanced commands that might require some creative interpretation, which any spirit would need to roll to comprehend, that they're going to biff.

[b1ffov3rfl0w]

Plus functionally there's no difference really between "they literally diminish" and "they act like someone who is sleep-deprived and hung over". I mean, when you haven't slept and you're exhausted from staying up all night drinking, you are literally less smart than normal.

The fact that they're dumb due to eddies in the magico-mysticality continuum or whatever rather than being tired is not the point; the point is that yes, they're dumb.

[Dr Funfrock]

Interesting that you mention mana static in particular, as I've been having problems with that one today.

From the rules it appears that yes, the spirits force, and therefore stats diminish in background count. Enough count, they get disrupted, as Trollman said.
This becomes a bit weird when a mage can apparently just throw off mana static at around Force 8, which causes all spirits in the area to pop, unless they are force 9 or more (so, ridiculous), but also dropping their Magic (we'll say 5 for arguments sake) to 0.

Do they immediately stop sustaining the spell because they have Magic 0 (which I would assume means that it fails to become permanent because they stopped sustaining it)?
Isn't this just a little bit broken when used as a combat spell? They cast, all spirits die, they go to Magic 0, the spell fizzles, they go back to full magic. Why bother with Banishing?

[Tobias]

Interesting that you mention mana static in particular, as I've been having problems with that one today.

From the rules it appears that yes, the spirits force, and therefore stats diminish in background count. Enough count, they get disrupted, as Trollman said.
This becomes a bit weird when a mage can apparently just throw off mana static at around Force 8, which causes all spirits in the area to pop, unless they are force 9 or more (so, ridiculous), but also dropping their Magic (we'll say 5 for arguments sake) to 0.

Do they immediately stop sustaining the spell because they have Magic 0 (which I would assume means that it fails to become permanent because they stopped sustaining it)?
Isn't this just a little bit broken when used as a combat spell? They cast, all spirits die, they go to Magic 0, the spell fizzles, they go back to full magic. Why bother with Banishing?

IIRC drain is increased by the absolute amount of background count. So if a mage throws a force 8 Mana static first to get it to have a -8 BC he would need to get 8 successes which is fairly hard. And then take the drain value for the force 8 spell +8. I could be wrong as I don't have my book on me but thats how I remember it.

[Shiloh]

...a mage can...throw off mana static at around Force 8, which causes all spirits in the area to pop, unless they are force 9 or more (so, ridiculous), but also dropping their Magic (we'll say 5 for arguments sake) to 0.

Only if they're actually in the area they're targetting. But yes, that's how I'd read it.

Do they immediately stop sustaining the spell because they have Magic 0 (which I would assume means that it fails to become permanent because they stopped sustaining it)?

Yep.

Isn't this just a little bit broken when used as a combat spell? They cast, all spirits die, they go to Magic 0, the spell fizzles, they go back to full magic. Why bother with Banishing?

Yep, that's a *good* question. Also, assuming a slightly less powerful mage with Magic 4, say who has enough extra dice from Spellcasting and Focuses and Edge to ground-zero a 4-hit Manastatic while sustaining a spell: does the spell drop?

[Fuchs]

I'd say yes. The mana static is not aspected, is it?

[DocTaotsu]

Isn't this just a little bit broken when used as a combat spell? They cast, all spirits die, they go to Magic 0, the spell fizzles, they go back to full magic. Why bother with Banishing?

Mana static spikes dissipate at (I think) 1 point per hour, so banishing still it's place because you can still function after you banish their spirit.

[Fuchs]

That's if you make it permanent, Doc. If you drop it before it becomes permanent that's no concern.

[DocTaotsu]

Ah... That is what the overall rules say. Hm....

[Fuchs]

I don't mind the spell, to be honest - a good counter to spirit/sustained spell inflation. And a good way to weaken stronger spirits, which then can be taken down by other means, or to create a temporary safe haven for a group chased by spirits or other astrally active threats.

But it's stationary, so if used offensively most enemies will just be able to move out of the area. Another thing I like.

[DocTaotsu]

No I like this spell as well, I call it "The great equalizer" and it rewards mages who aren't too stuck up about magic to learn how to... you know, shoot someone in the head.

And yeah, using it as a way to even the odds against uber spirits is a great idea.

[CanRay]

... it rewards mages who aren't too stuck up about magic to learn how to... you know, shoot someone in the head.

Well, the nice thing about a Colt Manhunter is that, when you shoot someone with it, it doesn't cause your nose to bleed from forcing the mana through your body.

Just your ears to bleed from the gunshot. But, well, after listening to Trog Rock...

[Tarantula]

Isn't this just a little bit broken when used as a combat spell? They cast, all spirits die, they go to Magic 0, the spell fizzles, they go back to full magic. Why bother with Banishing?

Your example, a force 8 mana static with the magician in the area of effect. They cast the force 8 (and I'll assume 8 hits on the spellcasting test). Fantastic, all the force 8 or less spirits drop, and the magicians magic rating drops to 0. Now, for drain. Casting in a background count adds the background count to the force of the cast spell for purposes of drain, SM, 118. So, now he resists it as a force 16 mana static. 16/2 = 8. +4 = 12. Thats 12P drain hes going to suck. That hurts. I assume P because I doubt he has a magic of 16+.

Yep, that's a *good* question. Also, assuming a slightly less powerful mage with Magic 4, say who has enough extra dice from Spellcasting and Focuses and Edge to ground-zero a 4-hit Manastatic while sustaining a spell: does the spell drop?

As far as your example... Force 4 mana static with the mage in the center, again, resists as if it were force 8. So thats 8/2 = 4 +4 = 8. Since force 8 is higher than his magic (of 4) the drain is P. 8P is nothing to snear at for drain resistance.

[Shiloh]

As far as your example... Force 4 mana static with the mage in the center, again, resists as if it were force 8. So thats 8/2 = 4 +4 = 8. Since force 8 is higher than his magic (of 4) the drain is P. 8P is nothing to snear at for drain resistance.

Absolutely not, no. but assuming he survives, bleeding nose and potential stroke an' all, does he still have enough *omph* to keep the Heal spell he just popped onto the exsanguinating teammate going? Perhaps this is an intentional and circumstantial limit to the Force of Manastatic: don't cast one that'll drop your Magic to zero if you want to keep sustaining any spells. Or maybe a Magic Rating of 0 is still a Magic Rating, for the purpose of sustaining an already-cast spell.

[Tarantula]

SM, 118, "If background count reduces a character's Magic to attribute to 0 or less, he is rendered unable to use any magical abilities within the area." Sorry, you hit 0, spell stops sustaining.

[Shiloh]

SM, 118, "If background count reduces a character's Magic to attribute to 0 or less, he is rendered unable to use any magical abilities within the area." Sorry, you hit 0, spell stops sustaining.

Cheers, Tarantula. That's that one answered. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[suppenhuhn]

Why do you assume the mana static affects its own drain? Don't you cast a spell before its effect takes place? If you cast a manaball on yourself you also don't get the damage modifier on your test, so why should that be for mana static?

[Fortune]

If you cast a manaball on yourself you also don't get the damage modifier on your test ...

Minor nitpick: Wound Modifiers never affect Damage or Drain resistance tests.

I pretty much agree with the rest of your post though.

[Fuchs]

Step by step, spellcasting seems to indicate that the mana static effect could be considered gone before the drain resistance check is made:

(SR4 p. 173)

Step 4: Spellcasting Test

Step 5: Determine Effect

Step 6: Resist Drain

Now, once you drop your own magic rating to 0 by your own spell in step 5, the spell cannot be sustained, so should poof at once, so there's no static around to affect step 6.

That is a rather semantic interpretation though, and one could as well rule that effects linger for the whole spellcasting action sequence.

[Shiloh]

Step by step, spellcasting seems to indicate that the mana static effect could be considered gone before the drain resistance check is made:

(SR4 p. 173)

Step 4: Spellcasting Test

Step 5: Determine Effect

Step 6: Resist Drain

Now, once you drop your own magic rating to 0 by your own spell in step 5, the spell cannot be sustained, so should poof at once, so there's no static around to affect step 6.

That is a rather semantic interpretation though, and one could as well rule that effects linger for the whole spellcasting action sequence.

"Determine effect" doesn't mean "comes into effect", necessarily. It's partly because we humes can't do both at the same time, and partly to emphasise that a spell works even if its caster fails the Drain test.

[BRodda]

Absolutely not, no. but assuming he survives, bleeding nose and potential stroke an' all, does he still have enough *omph* to keep the Heal spell he just popped onto the exsanguinating teammate going? Perhaps this is an intentional and circumstantial limit to the Force of Manastatic: don't cast one that'll drop your Magic to zero if you want to keep sustaining any spells. Or maybe a Magic Rating of 0 is still a Magic Rating, for the purpose of sustaining an already-cast spell.

OK, stupid question then. Background counts only hurts if its not aspected toward your tradition. If I'm casting it, why isn't it aspected toward my tradition (or at lest toward me).

Of course even I'd say that is broken, but if I'm a hermetic mage why can't I cast mana static that only affects shamans? Or is that a whole new spell?

[Tarantula]

Because the background count created via mana static isn't aspected at all. Aspecting background counts takes a considerable amount of time (and a metamagic) so its beyond the abilities of merely a single spell.

[FrankTrollman]

A very important thing to consider is that Mana Static creates background count equal to the number of spellcasting hits, not the Force of the spell. So to get a Rating 8 Background out of the deal, you'd need to cast it at Force 8, and you'd need to actually roll 8 hits on the casting test. And while that is possible, it would generally be just as possible to cast a high force Mana Ball and kill all the spirits that way.

-Frank

[suppenhuhn]

If you have magic 6, spellcasting 6 and edge 4 then 8 hits are what you'd expect. Also you could cast it at a lower force so drain stays stun and you don't have the diminishing effect on your party's size that a force 8 stunball would have (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

[Tarantula]

suppenhuhn hit on the benefit of mana static compared to manaball for spirit removal purposes. Just because the spirit is in melee with your street sam/adept/anyone except yourself, doesn't make mana static any less effective.

[Fortune]

I prefer Slaughter Spirit myself.

[Tarantula]

I prefer Slaughter Spirit myself.

But this one doubles as a way to neuter the enemy mage as well (since there is no reistance test, counterspelling doesn't help).......

I just thought of a new way to kill a dragon!

[Fortune]

You keep stating that there is no Resistance test (hence no Counterspelling), but I have yet to see that this is actually the case. I believe that Counterspelling does apply, and I seem to recall Synner confirming this somewhere around here.

[Tarantula]

I tried for a good long while to try to get a clear answer, but just as with physical barrier, mana barrier, and the rest, since its an environmental spell, it doesn't directly affect the mage and thus, no counterspelling.

I do not think it should work this way, but by RAW it does, I hope environmental spells are errataed to include that if a target who is counterspelled is in the area of effect, counterspelling can apply to the spellcasting test.

[Fortune]

Shrug. As far as I know, if the Spell doesn't actually call for a Resistance test, then the (target) mage just rolls Counterspelling alone to resist the Spell or reduce its effects.

[Tarantula]

The problem, is that counterspelling only works if the mage/target is the target of the spell. These spells do not target people, they target the environment, and as such, are never eligible for counterspelling.

[Fortune]

I guess we'll just have to agree to differ, because I just don't see it that way, and as I said above, I seem to recall Synner speaking up and clarifying the matter.

[DocTaotsu]

I have to agree with Fortune here as well. Counterspelling is described as "jamming" astral space which seems in indicate you can do it for just about anything. After all it'd be pretty crappy not to be able to jam that flamethrower spell just because it's generating physical heat.

[FrankTrollman]

If you have magic 6, spellcasting 6 and edge 4 then 8 hits are what you'd expect. Also you could cast it at a lower force so drain stays stun and you don't have the diminishing effect on your party's size that a force 8 stunball would have (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

LOL WUT?
12 dice. spend an Edge to reroll failures: average 6.7 hits.
16 dice, having spent an Edge to get rule of 6: average 6.4 hits.
And the Force limits hits, so you can't cast it at less than Force 8 if you want to get 8 hits. To get an average of 8 hits by spending Edge for extra dice and ignoring the hit cap, you'd need to be rolling a total of 20+ dice, which is just plumb hard to do (and even that would only give you 8 hits half the time).

You have to be seriously full of awesome to get 8 hits on a spellcasting test. There are folks who can do it, but they are few and far between.

---

Meanwhile, Mana Static is an environmental spell. It doesn't grant spell resistance, and Counterspelling doesn't do crap against it. Spells which affect the world physically in that manner don't allow Counterspelling. Even Firebolts don't allow normal counterspelling, the sounterspelling dice are only rolled to soak damage after the firebolt already impacts the victim.

But the absolute coolest thing about Mana Static, the reason that it has one of the most obscene drain codes in the entire game, is because you can use it to disrupt enemies who are on the Astral while you are not. Mana Static affects space, which is Dual Natured. The space then becomes so inhospitable to Astral Forms that they become disrupted. But you never actually targeted anything Astral while you were physical. This means that you can open fire with what are effectively deadly weapons on spirits without subjecting yourself to their attacks. A Mage with Mana Static can force a spirit ambush to materialize or run without exposing himself to danger. And that's awesome.

-Frank

[DocTaotsu]

Into the light I command you!

So, short of droping the mage before he permancies the spell, there isn't a damn thing you can do about it?

[Fuchs]

Move out of the area? Space your spirits out so they don't get hit all at once? Shoot the mage after he took drain? Know that you're safe from enemy spirits as well?

It's not as if it's a particularly powerful spell against mages who do not rely too much on spirits and/or sustained, locked or quickened spells. It's a bit like throwing smoke grenades.

[Tarantula]

Found it.

The next batch of SR4 errata should address this. It will effectively clarify that when there is no relevant Att to add to the Counterspelling skill (such as in the case of inanimate objects), then Counterspelling is still rolled and hits are deducted from the Spellcaster's successes before these are compared with Object Resistance. The same errata should also address how mana barriers affect spells that do not require Resistance Tests.

Though, he doesn't quite nail down and if Environmental spells can/can't be counterspelled.

[Tarantula]

Move out of the area? Space your spirits out so they don't get hit all at once? Shoot the mage after he took drain? Know that you're safe from enemy spirits as well?

It's not as if it's a particularly powerful spell against mages who do not rely too much on spirits and/or sustained, locked or quickened spells. It's a bit like throwing smoke grenades.

Really? Ok, I'll cast a force 4 mana static on your mage then. Have fun with an effective +4 to force for drain purposes for EVERY spell you cast. Oh, and a -4 to your magic.

[Fuchs]

Really? Ok, I'll cast a force 4 mana static on your mage then. Have fun with an effective +4 to force for drain purposes for EVERY spell you cast. Oh, and a -4 to your magic.

I'd simply move out of the area, then cast. The area of effect is not mobile. It is really like smoke grenades in that regard - as long as a mage is within the area of effect, he has trouble targetting spells, but the smoke doesn't cling to him. And I'd rather have smoke grenades lobbed at me than WP, and rather mana static than fireball.

[CanRay]

So, short of droping the mage before he permancies the spell, there isn't a damn thing you can do about it?

First rule of Combat: Shoot the Magician.

Second rule of Combat: Shoot the Big Ork.

Third rule of Combat: If you're a Big Ork, get a Magician friend.

[FrankTrollman]

Really? Ok, I'll cast a force 4 mana static on your mage then. Have fun with an effective +4 to force for drain purposes for EVERY spell you cast. Oh, and a -4 to your magic.

Well, it's a -4 to actual spell Force as well, so that cancels as far as Drain is concerned. A better wording would have been:

• Your Magic Attribute is reduced by the rating of the Background Count while you are in it.
• The Force of any spell you cast into or out of a Background Count is reduced by the rating of the Background Count (this does not reduce the Drain of the spell).
• The Force of any sustained spell brought into a background count has its Force reduced by the rating of the Background Count until it leaves the Background Count. Spells brought to zero are disrupted.
• The Force of any Spirit brought into a background count has its Force reduced by the rating of the Background Count until it leaves the Background Count. Spirits brought to zero are disrupted.

The thing where the Force of a spell is reduced and then increased for the purposes of Drain is weird and unfortunate.

---

But in any case, I would way rather that someone hit me with a Force 4 Mana Static than have them get the same 6 Drain getting the same 4 hits shooting me with a Force 7 Flamethrower.

-Frank

[Tarantula]

I'd simply move out of the area, then cast. The area of effect is not mobile. It is really like smoke grenades in that regard - as long as a mage is within the area of effect, he has trouble targetting spells, but the smoke doesn't cling to him. And I'd rather have smoke grenades lobbed at me than WP, and rather mana static than fireball.

It is until it becomes permanent. Just like any other area spell being sustained. And since it takes 2xDV in Combat Turns to become permanent, for a force 4 Mana Static that means you can move it around for (4/2=2+4=6x2=)12 combat turns. Though, I can see the arguement that you shouldn't be able to move a spell as you sustain it to become permanent (or an equally good arguement, that moving it resets the timer for it to become permanent.)

A better use by the mage would be to delay his action (assuming he got to go first) then interrupt your casting by casting his mana static on top of you.

[Fortune]

Found it.

Much obliged. I knew I hadn't dreamed it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Though, he doesn't quite nail down and if Environmental spells can/can't be counterspelled.

Close enough for me. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

[Tarantula]

Me too, I think its horribly stupid that you can't counterspell an environmental spell.

[FrankTrollman]

Me too, I think its horribly stupid that you can't counterspell an environmental spell.

Counterspelling protects individuals, it doesn't stop spells from coming into existence. How would you go about protecting the air from having a wall take form inside it?

Or to put it another way: when you counterspell an Invisibility, you don't make the invisible character visible, you prevent the invisibility from hiding the target from the people you are protecting. The people you provide counterspelling to can see the target, everyone else still can't. If there was an analagous effect for Mana Static that would be horribly broken. The last thing anyone needs is to have the ability to create background counts that their team is immune to on the fly.

-Frank

[Aaron]

Well, it's a -4 to actual spell Force as well, so that cancels as far as Drain is concerned. A better wording would have been:

• The Force of any spell you cast into or out of a Background Count is reduced by the rating of the Background Count (this does not reduce the Drain of the spell).
• The Force of any sustained spell brought into a background count has its Force reduced by the rating of the Background Count until it leaves the Background Count. Spells brought to zero are disrupted.

Er ... I might have missed it, but I don't remember reading anything about background count reducing a spell's Force. And the example of spellcasting in a mana void (which uses the rules for spellcasting with a background count) on page 120 of Street Magic seems to indicate that this is not the case. Would you mind filling me in on what I'm missing?

[Mr. Unpronouncea...]

An existing spell's force would be reduced.

Newly cast-spells suffer the limits imposed by the caster's reduced magic rating.

[Tarantula]

Well, it's a -4 to actual spell Force as well, so that cancels as far as Drain is concerned. A better wording would have been:

• Your Magic Attribute is reduced by the rating of the Background Count while you are in it.
• The Force of any spell you cast into or out of a Background Count is reduced by the rating of the Background Count (this does not reduce the Drain of the spell).
• The Force of any sustained spell brought into a background count has its Force reduced by the rating of the Background Count until it leaves the Background Count. Spells brought to zero are disrupted.
• The Force of any Spirit brought into a background count has its Force reduced by the rating of the Background Count until it leaves the Background Count. Spirits brought to zero are disrupted.

Are you sure thats how it works? Reading the book seems to imply this:
Mage a has magic 4
Mage b has magic 6

Mage a casts a force 4 mana static on mage b, and gets 4 hits.
Mage b casts a force 4 (his maximium, as his magic is now 2) flamethrower at mage A, but resists drain as if it were a force 8 flamethrower.

Is that not correct?

[Particle_Beam]

You don't move the mana static. The moment you cast it on the specific environment that you targeted with your eyes, it stays there, even if it takes some time to become permanent and you walk around. If you cast it in a room, and wander around, the mana static effect stays in the room, not with you. It's not an "aura"-effect. So, yes, the astral beings and mages affected should just leave the room, and can so, unless somehow hindered.

[Tarantula]

You can move area effect sustained spells via complex action.

I said there is an arguement for allowing mana static to be moved, and one for not allowing it.

You should be able to move it because it is an area spell, and is currently being sustained (before it becomes permanent).

You should not be able to move it because it is being sustained to be permanent, and moving it kind of negates that purpose.

Either way, a clarification on the issue would be nice (AFAIK mana static is the only area effect permanent spell around).

[BRodda]

An existing spell's force would be reduced.

Newly cast-spells suffer the limits imposed by the caster's reduced magic rating.

OK another stupid question, what happens to dual natured creatures in a mana static zone or even in an area with a high background count. So lets say you have a group of ghouls dragging people off to their lair to be killed and eaten, I'd say that area would have a pretty horrific background count. Does that make it harder for them to see as they only can see with astral perception? What about other critter powers?

[Mr. Unpronouncea...]

ooh...good one.

Assensing is intuition+assensing, so as long as one's magic isn't reduced to 0, they should still be able to astrally percieve. For instance, a hellhound's magic is 3, so in a background count of 3 or more, he's just another dog. A non-mage ghoul would be blinded with a counter-aspected background count of 1.

Personally, I'd rule that free-willed dual natured creatures would tend to avoid counter-aspect background count.

However...I wouldn't think 'kill people and eat them' would create an aspect that would be counter to the ghouls' nature. If anything, it would raise their effective magic rating.

[Aaron]

An existing spell's force would be reduced.

Oh. Wait, where does it say that?

[Tarantula]

SM, 118, "Pre-existing wards, mana barriers, active foci, sustained spells, and quickened/anchored spells are similarly affected. Reduce their Force by the absolute value of the background count. If the Force is reduced to zero or less, wards and mana barriers will collapse, foci will deactivate, and spells will fizzle. The enchantment on a quickened/anchored spell or ward/mana barrier will repair itself once removed from the background count, returning to its regular Force. Background count also affects astral visibility (see p. 114), which affects both assensing and astral combat."

As far as dual natured characters.... SM, 120, "Dual-natured creatures and spirits are typically uncomfortable within a mana ebb, even though it doesn’t cause them any harm directly." Note, Ebbs are from -1 to -6. Beyond that it becomes a Mana Void, SM, 120, "If a character exposes himself to the astral plane (either by astrally perceiving or projecting) while in a void, he risks having his astral form torn apart as it dissipates into the surrounding emptiness—as would air in a vacuum. Each Combat Turn the character is astrally active, he suffers Physical damage with a Damage Value equal to the absolute value of the void’s rating (so a –8 Rating void deals a DV of (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) . Dual-natured or astrally-perceiving characters resist this damage with their Body attribute, while pure astral forms (such as projecting characters) resist with their Willpower attribute. If the character has any form of astral armor (such as the Mystic Armor critter power), it applies to this test."

[Mr. Unpronouncea...]

Interesting - I missed that passage...though I'm not sure a temporary reduction of the magic attribute counts as 'harm.' Ah, well - maybe it'll show up in the FAQ or errata sometime.

[Aaron]

@Tarantula: Gracias.

[Shiloh]

OK another stupid question, what happens to dual natured creatures in a mana static zone or even in an area with a high background count. So lets say you have a group of ghouls dragging people off to their lair to be killed and eaten, I'd say that area would have a pretty horrific background count. Does that make it harder for them to see as they only can see with astral perception? What about other critter powers?

I reckon their lair would be aspected towards them, so they'd be unhindered, even assisted by its background.

[BRodda]

I reckon their lair would be aspected towards them, so they'd be unhindered, even assisted by its background.

So you have a pack of 30 ghouls that have kidnapped and devoured 30 or 40 people in a slow and grizzly fashion over a few years. They have kept several alive for days at a time before eating them. They have been doing this in an old abandoned tenement (100 or so years of misery and violence).
I guess all of a sudden having a group go to rescue a victim as a run would be murder (no pun intended) on a magic heavy team. I'd imagine a background count of 4 to be highly possible. Throw in a mage ghoul that is aspected and you have a fight worth having rather than just "A bug hunt." that ghoul hunts usually are in most games.

Heh, give that ghoul mage mana static and if he casts it at force 4 would have a background count of 6. That should ruin just about any runners day.

[Tarantula]

Aspects are positive. I'd argue that mana static is negative. That'd make it +4 for the aspected background count, and then -4 for the mana static, equaling 0 for the purposes of background count.

[Fortune]

Aspects are positive. I'd argue that mana static is negative. That'd make it +4 for the aspected background count, and then -4 for the mana static, equaling 0 for the purposes of background count.

Only for those that the Background is normally Aspected toward. All others would still be at a penalty.

And I think that Background Counts of 4 to 6 are silly, outside of major magical sites. The habitual feeding ground for a pack of Ghouls might have a 1 or 2, maybe rising slightly during one of their frenzies.

[Johnny the Bull]

Only for those that the Background is normally Aspected toward. All others would still be at a penalty.

And I think that Background Counts of 4 to 6 are silly, outside of major magical sites. The habitual feeding ground for a pack of Ghouls might have a 1 or 2, maybe rising slightly during one of their frenzies.

I'd agree with that.

[Shiloh]

So you have a pack of 30 ghouls that have kidnapped and devoured 30 or 40 people in a slow and grizzly fashion over a few years.

Only one each? No wonder they're all skin and bones... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) A pack that large would make a serious dent in even an urban population... Though I suppose they might mostly be eating carrion rather than hunting their own...

I'd imagine a background count of 4 to be highly possible.

I'd not go that far. Maybe 2.

Throw in a mage ghoul that is aspected and you have a fight worth having rather than just "A bug hunt." that ghoul hunts usually are in most games.

Hoo yeah! Gives the ghouls a good stronghold to make deals with Tamanous from, too.

[Tarantula]

I don't.

Background count is rating either positively or negatively (-12 to -7 is voids, -6 to -1 ebbs, +1 to +6 domains, and +7 to +12 warps). I'd argue that mana static is a negative background count modifier, as it actively interferes and makes mana use harder (like an ebb, not like a domain). So, the area with the mana static in it would be affected (in the example) of a domain of +4, and a mana static of -4. That makes it an effective background count of 0.

Now, this is my interpretation, as there is no written rule for how mana static interferes with backgrounds. Another possible interpretation is that mana static overrides the domain, and causes a flat -4 ebb in the area, penalties for everyone.