IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Seth
post Oct 31 2010, 11:59 AM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,248
Joined: 14-October 10
Member No.: 19,113



SR4A page 204 states
QUOTE
"As an optional rule, every net hit applied also increases the Drain DV of the spell by +1.

I am mostly complementary about the Shadowrun rules, but this optional rule strikes me as poorly thought through. I have seen quite a few posts on dumpshock to this topic...mostly expressing dis-satisfaction with this rule, but I have not come away with a clear idea on how to deal with it.

I think that the reason that it exists is that the game designers felt that direct damage spells are too cost effective: for example mana bolt is F/2-1, so a force 9 spell is only 3 drain. Assuming a few nett successes this can easily knockout most opponents, and the caster will probably take 0..1 damage from it. Its very close to a "I win" spell.

The consequence of this rule however seems to me that it is strongly encourages overcasting, and punishes being good at spell casting / lucky. Each 2 points of overcasting cause one more drain...thus 2 DV for 1 drain. This rule means that 1 more DV equals one more drain, half as good as overcasting. It also means that the successes you roll with spell casting the the worse you are physically...thats kind of the opposite of most other die rolls, in which more is better. Here I can damage myself much more if I roll well.

So the question I am asking is: How do you handle the drain for direct combat spells in your games?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Glyph
post Oct 31 2010, 04:11 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



Like many poorly thought-out rules, the increased Drain for direct combat spells fixes the wrong problems. It gimps the category of spells that are, frankly a combat mage's bread and butter spells - a mage casting in combat needs some reliable spells with Drain that is relatively easy to soak. It forces mages to min-max simply to be effective at all, it punishes success, and it doesn't address the real potential problems - multicasting and overcasting.

If you feel magic needs some fine-tuning in your games, here are some house rules that I would suggest, that reign mages in a bit without gimping their major go-to category of offensive spells or forcing them to turn into munchkins merely to survive:

Overcasting:
Simple change. For the Force up to Magic, Drain is calculated as normal. But for every point of Force over that, add a full point of Drain.

Multicasting:
Simple change. Things like visual modifiers, stationary targets, or background counts - conditional modifiers - apply to all dice pools. Everything else - specializations, mentor spirits, and foci - get added to the pool before you split it.

Mundane spell defense:
I would add the mundane equivalent of full defense - they get to roll double their resisting stat, if they expend an initiative pass to do nothing but resist the spell. It gives mundanes an extra option, without gimping spellcasting too much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Seth   How do most games treat drain for direct combat spells   Oct 31 2010, 11:59 AM
- - Makki   QUOTE (Seth @ Oct 31 2010, 01:59 PM) So t...   Oct 31 2010, 12:19 PM
- - InfidelZombie   Generally what I would do and what I have done the...   Oct 31 2010, 12:26 PM
- - Eddy Munster   I have looked at it a few ways, but came up with t...   Oct 31 2010, 01:18 PM
- - Faelan   I have zero problem with the rule as it stands. D...   Oct 31 2010, 02:06 PM
|- - Karoline   QUOTE (Faelan @ Oct 31 2010, 09:06 AM) I ...   Oct 31 2010, 03:00 PM
|- - Draco18s   QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 31 2010, 10:00 AM) ...   Oct 31 2010, 03:17 PM
|- - Faelan   QUOTE (Draco18s @ Oct 31 2010, 10:17 AM) ...   Oct 31 2010, 03:46 PM
|- - Karoline   QUOTE (Draco18s @ Oct 31 2010, 11:17 AM) ...   Oct 31 2010, 07:45 PM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 31 2010, 01:45 PM) ...   Oct 31 2010, 08:56 PM
- - Ascalaphus   QUOTE (Makki @ Oct 31 2010, 02:19 PM) old...   Oct 31 2010, 02:45 PM
|- - Makki   QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Oct 31 2010, 04:45 PM...   Oct 31 2010, 04:13 PM
- - pbangarth   I may be bringing in a conversation that doesn...   Oct 31 2010, 03:38 PM
|- - Faelan   QUOTE (pbangarth @ Oct 31 2010, 10:38 AM)...   Oct 31 2010, 04:04 PM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (pbangarth @ Oct 31 2010, 08:38 AM)...   Oct 31 2010, 04:41 PM
- - pbangarth   I presented the essence option for those who feel ...   Oct 31 2010, 04:06 PM
|- - Faelan   QUOTE (pbangarth @ Oct 31 2010, 11:06 AM)...   Oct 31 2010, 04:15 PM
- - Glyph   Like many poorly thought-out rules, the increased ...   Oct 31 2010, 04:11 PM
- - Warlordtheft   My comment is that this in and of itself is in a v...   Oct 31 2010, 04:29 PM
- - Mäx   IF you have a problem with how good Direct damage ...   Oct 31 2010, 04:42 PM
- - Seth   QUOTE But what is the difference between that and ...   Oct 31 2010, 04:45 PM
- - Yerameyahu   As in the other thread, there are (few to no) visi...   Oct 31 2010, 08:42 PM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 31 2010, 02:42 PM...   Oct 31 2010, 08:57 PM
- - Karoline   Since when can you use astral perception to target...   Oct 31 2010, 09:11 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Since forever, Karoline! Just kidding: since S...   Oct 31 2010, 09:16 PM
- - Karoline   Now, I know you could use it for guns (With the pe...   Oct 31 2010, 09:16 PM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Karoline @ Oct 31 2010, 02:16 PM) ...   Oct 31 2010, 09:25 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Better than okay: no penalty (dunno why).   Oct 31 2010, 09:30 PM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 31 2010, 02:30 PM...   Oct 31 2010, 10:32 PM
- - Yerameyahu   No, we don't. There's definitely no base p...   Nov 1 2010, 02:20 AM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 31 2010, 07:20 PM...   Nov 1 2010, 02:35 AM
- - Yerameyahu   That's what I just said. Karoline, you, and I...   Nov 1 2010, 03:17 AM
- - Ascalaphus   QUOTE (Glyph @ Oct 31 2010, 06:11 PM) Mun...   Nov 1 2010, 12:34 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th May 2025 - 08:04 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.