IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Sustaining spells and "other tests", What "other tests", esp. what is not included.
Surukai
post Mar 24 2012, 04:10 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 17-January 10
From: Sweden
Member No.: 18,046



Sustaining a spell adds a stacking -2 penalty to "all other tests" in spellcasting on SR4A p. 182.

Drain resistance is a named exception for this.

But, damage resistance is a test too, right? and "Other tests" does that mean spellcasting is not included? I.e. it debuffs things like shooting and hacking and speaking to people but not spellcasting?

How about defending against attacks in combat?

I didn't really think much about it before and just assumed it was everything but damage/drain resistance since I thought mages were powerful enough anyway but it makes a LOT of spells obsolete unless you can max out them at ludicrous force (Who want +3 reaction when you only net 1 defense severely debuffs everything else)

I guess that is why most mages in my game have just spammed stunbolt/ball and maybe a heal but completely ignored everything you can't put in a sustaining focus... or?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Neko Asakami
post Mar 24 2012, 08:50 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 228
Joined: 30-July 09
Member No.: 17,450



Personally, I rule that it's anything the character has to do consciously, so things like damage tests and disease resistance don't get the penalty. However, I offer this in support of Umaro, from SR4A pg. 240, under the heading of "Threading," emphasis mine.

QUOTE
Threaded complex forms must be sustained (similar to how magicians sustain spells). Sustaining requires effort on the technomancer’s part, so he suffers a –2 dice pool modifier to all tests for each sustained complex form. This modifier does not apply to use of the threaded complex form, but it does apply to all other actions the technomancer makes.


Since there is no clarification here that says it applies only to Matrix/Sprite-related tests, I would indeed think that (in a rare display of consistency!) the sustaining penalty applies to everything outside of the threading/spell itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Surukai   Sustaining spells and "other tests"   Mar 24 2012, 04:10 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Any *skill* test, AFAIK? It does seem a little slo...   Mar 24 2012, 04:14 PM
- - UmaroVI   No, it applies to everything that isn't Drain.   Mar 24 2012, 04:24 PM
|- - Neraph   QUOTE (UmaroVI @ Mar 24 2012, 11:24 AM) N...   Mar 24 2012, 04:52 PM
- - Surukai   Y: I guess that makes sense. I assume it includes ...   Mar 24 2012, 04:25 PM
- - UmaroVI   Right. The one thing it doesn't apply to is th...   Mar 24 2012, 04:26 PM
- - Surukai   It sounds kind of strange that a mage with 2 spell...   Mar 24 2012, 04:49 PM
- - UmaroVI   I can't find any exceptions other than Drain, ...   Mar 24 2012, 05:08 PM
|- - Neraph   QUOTE (UmaroVI @ Mar 24 2012, 12:08 PM) I...   Mar 24 2012, 06:06 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Definitely spellcasting, Surakai. That just seems...   Mar 24 2012, 05:48 PM
- - Yerameyahu   HA. Jesus, Neraph, the female thing is an all-new ...   Mar 24 2012, 06:19 PM
- - UmaroVI   I think the argument that it only applies to magic...   Mar 24 2012, 08:29 PM
- - Yerameyahu   I agree. It should apply to almost everything (but...   Mar 24 2012, 08:36 PM
- - Neko Asakami   Personally, I rule that it's anything the char...   Mar 24 2012, 08:50 PM
|- - Eratosthenes   QUOTE (Neko Asakami @ Mar 24 2012, 03:50 ...   Mar 24 2012, 08:56 PM
- - Neko Asakami   Yeah, I should have said it a bit better. Edit my...   Mar 24 2012, 09:00 PM
- - UmaroVI   I agree, actually. Threading applies a penalty to ...   Mar 24 2012, 09:19 PM
- - Yerameyahu   As they should, because that's what makes sens...   Mar 24 2012, 09:34 PM
|- - HaxDBeheader   QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Mar 24 2012, 10:34 PM...   Mar 24 2012, 09:52 PM
- - UmaroVI   I'm not so sure that's a good idea. Mages ...   Mar 24 2012, 09:46 PM
- - Neko Asakami   Umaro, I was quoting that mostly to agree with you...   Mar 24 2012, 09:49 PM
- - Yerameyahu   It just doesn't make sense. It's a distrac...   Mar 24 2012, 09:49 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Now, if you *did* want to specifically make mages ...   Mar 24 2012, 09:54 PM
- - UmaroVI   There's one place where it says it is "di...   Mar 25 2012, 12:06 AM
- - Yerameyahu   Yeah. So, I'd either rule that it's actual...   Mar 25 2012, 02:29 AM
- - Thanee   Going by RAW it would probably count towards Damag...   Mar 25 2012, 08:26 AM
- - Irion   Actually RAW states, that it should only count tow...   Mar 25 2012, 09:33 AM
- - Yerameyahu   I wouldn't say that. There is at most an impli...   Mar 25 2012, 02:21 PM
- - Irion   @Yerameyahu Well, it is mostly like that. Actually...   Mar 25 2012, 04:42 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th June 2025 - 12:37 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.