IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Reverse-Engineering the Spell Formulae, anyone else done this?
phasmaphobic
post Dec 14 2005, 01:46 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: 13-December 05
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 8,070



I'm attempting to reverse-engineer the spell formulae of the spells in the core SR4 rulebook, mainly because my players are dying to create some new spells to match those they made back in the day.

I'd like to know first off, since I'm new here, if posting my results of these formulae would be kosher on these forums.

If so, tell me, and I'll continue and discuss =)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- phasmaphobic   Reverse-Engineering the Spell Formulae   Dec 14 2005, 01:46 AM
- - Veggiesama   I'd have no problem with it. That being said, ...   Dec 14 2005, 03:18 AM
- - phasmaphobic   Well, so far I've worked out the Combat spells...   Dec 14 2005, 03:23 AM
- - phasmaphobic   Illusion spells so far have similar formulae. The...   Dec 14 2005, 03:39 AM
- - Azralon   I wonder if some spells were given a fudge factor....   Dec 14 2005, 04:33 PM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (Azralon) I wonder if some spells were given...   Dec 14 2005, 08:00 PM
- - Azralon   Perhaps Indirect should have no modifiers, and Ele...   Dec 14 2005, 08:26 PM
- - phasmaphobic   I think I've figured out the Health spells. B...   Dec 14 2005, 08:30 PM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (Azralon) Perhaps Indirect should have no mo...   Dec 14 2005, 08:35 PM
- - Azralon   QUOTE (phasmaphobic)Physical Type +1 Stun Damage -...   Dec 14 2005, 08:36 PM
- - Aku   just out of curiosity, are you beginning with the ...   Dec 14 2005, 08:46 PM
- - Azralon   QUOTE (phasmaphobic) But something about it still ...   Dec 14 2005, 08:49 PM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (Aku) just out of curiosity, are you beginni...   Dec 14 2005, 08:50 PM
- - hyzmarca   QUOTE (phasmaphobic) QUOTE (Azralon @ Dec 14 ...   Dec 14 2005, 08:52 PM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (Azralon) QUOTE (phasmaphobic @ Dec 14 ...   Dec 14 2005, 08:53 PM
- - Azralon   Hrm. Maybe the choice between Stunbolt and Clout i...   Dec 14 2005, 09:04 PM
- - Big Crow   Wow. I had been trying to reverse=engineer firear...   Dec 15 2005, 01:46 AM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (Big Crow) Wow. I had been trying to revers...   Dec 15 2005, 02:00 AM
- - phasmaphobic   Regarding Detection spells, I might stand correcte...   Dec 15 2005, 02:32 AM
- - Aku   QUOTE God I want that new Magic sourcebook! D...   Dec 15 2005, 02:51 AM
- - Big Crow   QUOTE (phasmaphobic @ Dec 15 2005, 02:00 AM) ...   Dec 15 2005, 03:07 AM
- - phasmaphobic   Working on Manipulation spells, and sheesh this is...   Dec 15 2005, 03:38 AM
- - FrankTrollman   QUOTE (phasmaphobic) Should all of thise hold true...   Dec 15 2005, 04:09 AM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (FrankTrollman) I think the key on Detect En...   Dec 15 2005, 04:16 AM
- - FrankTrollman   QUOTE (phasmaphobic) I'm trying to deduce the ...   Dec 15 2005, 05:15 AM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (FrankTrollman) I don't want to get over...   Dec 15 2005, 08:51 AM
- - Azralon   That's actually why I brought up the "fud...   Dec 15 2005, 04:21 PM
- - Haughtyelf   Based on the discuss here is a sample manipulation...   Dec 15 2005, 08:01 PM
- - Jaid   manipulation spells should probably be broken down...   Dec 15 2005, 08:22 PM
- - Azralon   QUOTE (Haughtyelf) Blink(Physical) Type: P Range: ...   Dec 15 2005, 08:45 PM
- - phasmaphobic   QUOTE (Azralon) QUOTE (Haughtyelf @ Dec 15 20...   Dec 15 2005, 08:59 PM
- - Haughtyelf   QUOTE (Azralon) QUOTE (Haughtyelf @ Dec 15 20...   Dec 15 2005, 09:40 PM
- - Jaid   depends on how you look at it, really. teleportati...   Dec 15 2005, 09:44 PM
- - Haughtyelf   The easiest restriction is you have to have been t...   Dec 15 2005, 09:48 PM
- - Azralon   Teleportation and time travel discussions would re...   Dec 15 2005, 09:56 PM
- - Haughtyelf   Sorry, I didn't mean to get off on a tanget of...   Dec 15 2005, 10:04 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th September 2025 - 11:27 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.