IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Grenade launchers..., ...and why they might suck
Space Ghost
post Feb 17 2006, 08:24 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 400



i've brought this up on random occasions, but i never got a real answer. Page 145 of the Big Book states that you make a ranged test opposed by the opponents reaction (+Dodge, if applicable). There is a -2 penalty for the targets defense test.

1. What happens is the target wins the test? Is the shot negated, or do you just end up at full scatter?

Also, there is an option to target an area, in which case you treat it as a success test instead of an opposed test. So here's the big question:

2. What happens when you decide to target an area where people are standing? Or you target an inanimate object, then scatter onto some people? They don't get a reaction roll? The defense roll for targets tend to have the effect of increasing your scatter(by reducing your successes), but you're already past the whole scatter step.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Space Ghost   Grenade launchers...   Feb 17 2006, 08:24 PM
- - PBTHHHHT   Dont' forget that many folks who use grenade l...   Feb 17 2006, 08:32 PM
- - Galmorez   The way I have been ruling it is that the grenade ...   Feb 17 2006, 09:34 PM
- - BGMFH   GLs are mostly useful in Heroic Last Stand moments...   Feb 17 2006, 10:00 PM
- - Space Ghost   QUOTE (Galmorez) The way I have been ruling it is ...   Feb 17 2006, 10:12 PM
- - DigitalSoul   @Space Ghost: The gain I would say is reducing the...   Feb 17 2006, 10:21 PM
- - Space Ghost   But it takes 3.5 successes to land on target with ...   Feb 17 2006, 10:24 PM
- - Shrike30   That reduced scatter also gets a lot more importan...   Feb 17 2006, 10:35 PM
- - Rotbart van Dainig   AFAIS, the Airbust Table entry concerns rockets/mi...   Feb 17 2006, 10:40 PM
- - Space Ghost   Huh. And the text says grenade launchers are -4 p/...   Feb 17 2006, 11:13 PM
- - Hasaku   QUOTE AFAIS, the Airbust Table entry concerns roc...   Feb 17 2006, 11:18 PM
- - Space Ghost   It's the note about sensors that wins me over....   Feb 17 2006, 11:53 PM
- - Shrike30   I do find it odd, but I hadn't put that much t...   Feb 18 2006, 12:23 AM
- - Hasaku   QUOTE (Space Ghost @ Feb 17 2006, 04:53 PM) I...   Feb 18 2006, 03:04 AM
- - Space Ghost   True, but they could also be talking about the dif...   Feb 18 2006, 03:23 AM
- - mfb   i'm not sure why y'all are arguing so hard...   Feb 18 2006, 04:37 AM
- - Rotbart van Dainig   QUOTE (Hasaku)How do you figure? Since it does not...   Feb 18 2006, 11:55 AM
- - Space Ghost   QUOTE (mfb) i'm not sure why y'all are arg...   Feb 18 2006, 03:51 PM
- - Shrike30   Yeah, but if it's 1D6-4, you're talking ab...   Feb 19 2006, 07:53 AM
- - Rotbart van Dainig   Not that there is much 'if' after the writ...   Feb 19 2006, 10:20 AM
- - sapphire_wyvern   So... what about target characters who actually be...   Feb 20 2006, 10:48 AM
- - Rotbart van Dainig   That seems about to be what was inteded - of cours...   Feb 20 2006, 11:00 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th June 2026 - 08:17 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.