Oct 9 2003, 08:05 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 226 Joined: 4-June 03 Member No.: 4,685 |
Daaamn. I have read sourcebook and other sources, but I still do not get how exactly this is handled. My thoughts so far (which are surely wrong):
You choose spell, Manabolt You select force of spell, say 6 (my players are quite new and thus have no more than power 6) You use Sorcery active skill and sorcery pool to cast it? How damage scales up? Does it for attacking spells? Does force 6 means enemy will have 6 boxes damaged, so it is 6S? Protective spells are more understandable this way, number of successes usually means how good you used it. Except Impr Invis and Invis, is it contest (you reroll till get one, highest number and enemies later use this number as target) or you just use number of successes to later evaluate this? For drain, you use Body + Spellpool again? How much is drain? Those +1 +M or other numbers cofuse me somehow. I just do not get how exactly this calculates, for the same Manabolt |
|
|
|
Traks Spell casting math problems Oct 9 2003, 08:05 AM
Fenris I'll try and answer your questions as succintl... Oct 9 2003, 08:37 AM
Polaris Looks like Fenris beat me to this by a minute or t... Oct 9 2003, 08:58 AM
kenny26 wow, people are really patient when helping newbs ... Oct 9 2003, 09:06 AM
Polaris Traks,
Fenris is mistaken on one important point:... Oct 9 2003, 09:18 AM
Traks Gotta couple more questions.
Some spells have: d... Oct 9 2003, 09:20 AM
Fortune QUOTE (Fenris)Please also note that the sorcery sk... Oct 9 2003, 09:21 AM
Fortune QUOTE (Polaris) The only exception to this is spel... Oct 9 2003, 09:26 AM
Polaris Fortune,
Actually the wording on Spell Defense is... Oct 9 2003, 09:31 AM
Polaris Tracks,
To my knowledge there are no background s... Oct 9 2003, 09:35 AM
Fortune QUOTE (Polaris) Actually the wording on Spell Defe... Oct 9 2003, 09:39 AM
John Campbell You guys are all partially wrong about the Sorcery... Oct 9 2003, 09:40 AM
Polaris Fortune,
I dislike the way the rule is written to... Oct 9 2003, 09:43 AM
Polaris Tracks,
John is right, but I didn't include i... Oct 9 2003, 09:45 AM
Fortune QUOTE (John Campbell) You guys are all partially w... Oct 9 2003, 09:58 AM
The White Dwarf In total the above responses are right on. The wh... Oct 9 2003, 10:05 AM
Polaris *nod*
The only time I have *ever* seen two spells... Oct 9 2003, 10:09 AM
Munchkinslayer All these responses and everybody's arguing. ... Oct 9 2003, 10:18 AM
Polaris Slayer,
Whose arguing? It seems like most of us ... Oct 9 2003, 10:27 AM
Fortune QUOTE (Polaris) Whose arguing? It seems like most... Oct 9 2003, 10:32 AM
Munchkinslayer Okay maybe arguing is too strong. But nobody is i... Oct 9 2003, 10:37 AM
The White Dwarf There was some confusion over the wording of the ... Oct 9 2003, 10:41 AM
Traks Nah. They explained things I needed most, and ever... Oct 9 2003, 10:43 AM
DigitalMage Just to muddy the waters even more, using Sorcery ... Oct 9 2003, 02:17 PM
Dashifen QUOTE (Traks) Are there any background skills that... Oct 9 2003, 03:43 PM
Polaris Digital,
I think you are overstating the case. A... Oct 9 2003, 05:15 PM
Rev The way to get something like a background skill f... Oct 9 2003, 07:23 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th February 2026 - 05:31 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.