IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Spell casting math problems, Can someone explain in "dummy way"
Traks
post Oct 9 2003, 08:05 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 226
Joined: 4-June 03
Member No.: 4,685



Daaamn. I have read sourcebook and other sources, but I still do not get how exactly this is handled. My thoughts so far (which are surely wrong):

You choose spell, Manabolt
You select force of spell, say 6 (my players are quite new and thus have no more than power 6)

You use Sorcery active skill and sorcery pool to cast it?
How damage scales up? Does it for attacking spells?
Does force 6 means enemy will have 6 boxes damaged, so it is 6S?
Protective spells are more understandable this way, number of successes usually means how good you used it.
Except Impr Invis and Invis, is it contest (you reroll till get one, highest number and enemies later use this number as target) or you just use number of successes to later evaluate this?

For drain, you use Body + Spellpool again?
How much is drain? Those +1 +M or other numbers cofuse me somehow.
I just do not get how exactly this calculates, for the same Manabolt


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Traks   Spell casting math problems   Oct 9 2003, 08:05 AM
- - Fenris   I'll try and answer your questions as succintl...   Oct 9 2003, 08:37 AM
- - Polaris   Looks like Fenris beat me to this by a minute or t...   Oct 9 2003, 08:58 AM
- - kenny26   wow, people are really patient when helping newbs ...   Oct 9 2003, 09:06 AM
- - Polaris   Traks, Fenris is mistaken on one important point:...   Oct 9 2003, 09:18 AM
- - Traks   Gotta couple more questions. Some spells have: d...   Oct 9 2003, 09:20 AM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (Fenris)Please also note that the sorcery sk...   Oct 9 2003, 09:21 AM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (Polaris) The only exception to this is spel...   Oct 9 2003, 09:26 AM
- - Polaris   Fortune, Actually the wording on Spell Defense is...   Oct 9 2003, 09:31 AM
- - Polaris   Tracks, To my knowledge there are no background s...   Oct 9 2003, 09:35 AM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (Polaris) Actually the wording on Spell Defe...   Oct 9 2003, 09:39 AM
- - John Campbell   You guys are all partially wrong about the Sorcery...   Oct 9 2003, 09:40 AM
- - Polaris   Fortune, I dislike the way the rule is written to...   Oct 9 2003, 09:43 AM
- - Polaris   Tracks, John is right, but I didn't include i...   Oct 9 2003, 09:45 AM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (John Campbell) You guys are all partially w...   Oct 9 2003, 09:58 AM
- - The White Dwarf   In total the above responses are right on. The wh...   Oct 9 2003, 10:05 AM
- - Polaris   *nod* The only time I have *ever* seen two spells...   Oct 9 2003, 10:09 AM
- - Munchkinslayer   All these responses and everybody's arguing. ...   Oct 9 2003, 10:18 AM
- - Polaris   Slayer, Whose arguing? It seems like most of us ...   Oct 9 2003, 10:27 AM
- - Fortune   QUOTE (Polaris) Whose arguing? It seems like most...   Oct 9 2003, 10:32 AM
- - Munchkinslayer   Okay maybe arguing is too strong. But nobody is i...   Oct 9 2003, 10:37 AM
- - The White Dwarf   There was some confusion over the wording of the ...   Oct 9 2003, 10:41 AM
- - Traks   Nah. They explained things I needed most, and ever...   Oct 9 2003, 10:43 AM
- - DigitalMage   Just to muddy the waters even more, using Sorcery ...   Oct 9 2003, 02:17 PM
- - Dashifen   QUOTE (Traks) Are there any background skills that...   Oct 9 2003, 03:43 PM
- - Polaris   Digital, I think you are overstating the case. A...   Oct 9 2003, 05:15 PM
- - Rev   The way to get something like a background skill f...   Oct 9 2003, 07:23 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th February 2026 - 05:31 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.