May 3 2006, 05:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 28-February 06 Member No.: 8,317 |
Ok, so I have been talking it over with my GM and I wanted to throw this out to you as well because as I understand it this will save me a lot of drain in the future. I was looking over improved invisiblity vs regular invis. The regular kind if like obfuscate from WOD. People viewing the person actually see them it is only a mental filter that prevents them from registering the fact they see the invisible person. So they get a resistance test to overcome the spell and actually see the enchanted person.
Improved invisiblity however does actually turn the person invisible bending light around the subject so the average viewer gets no roll to resist improved invisibility. So unless I am missunderstanding the rules if you have improved invisiblity you don't need to cast it at a very high force at all. 1 or 2 would be fine. After all, if you have someone dispelling the force 2 spell that's just one round your now-visible street-sam has to shoot them in the head 6 times. So save yourself some drain, get improved invisiblity and not regular invisiblity then use it at force 2. (Unless you are making yourself invisible then cast at regular force for the most hits possible... After all.. that street sam can be replaced but you are very important to you.) |
|
|
|
30+coyote Improved invisibility and its Force. May 3 2006, 05:19 PM
Dashifen I ignore the bending of light while using Improved... May 3 2006, 05:24 PM
James McMurray Improved Invisibility is still resisted, and the f... May 3 2006, 06:19 PM
Kanada Ten If we consider your concept true, and say that Imp... May 3 2006, 09:14 PM
Shrike30 Nekkid ninja physad assaults, that's all I nee... May 4 2006, 07:11 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th January 2026 - 01:43 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.