IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Reality filter without a user., Somehow I’m thinking not but I can’t pro
Edward
post May 26 2006, 12:08 PM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Reality filter without a user.
Somehow I’m thinking not but I can’t prove it

I have been told that if you have a second comlink running agents (for example) then you can put a reality filter onit to increase the response allowing you to ad more agents without the agents efectivly running at a lower response.

For example I have a rating 4/4/4/1 comlink that serves no purpose other than to run my agents. I can have 3 rating 4 agents, if I have more then the comlinks response will drop to 3 and the agents will behave as if they were only rating 3. However if add a reality filter the reaction stat will increase to 5 and I will be able to have a total of 7 programs (reality filter and 6 agents) reducing the response back to 4. because the comlink isn’t projecting a user’s icon anywhere (only its agents) the reality filter will never have to make a test to se if it manages to over power the system sculpting.

I can come up with only one possible solution

The agent is projecting out and the reality filter must overcome the systems it interacts with. There are 2 problems with this.

First it still allows you to make chokepoints with twice the IC (without paying for the often house ruled corporate host that has no running programs limit).

Second if that was the case then when I run an agent on my comlink and set it to look for data while I go and hack a different node the reality filter is going to be testing against both systems, the rules do not indicate this disadvantage of agents.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Edward   Reality filter without a user.   May 26 2006, 12:08 PM
- - Serbitar   Unable to compute . . . need unwired . . . shuttin...   May 26 2006, 12:39 PM
- - Kanada Ten   I suppose the reality filiter could just be stripp...   May 26 2006, 01:08 PM
- - Edward   Loading a reality filter into an agent would not b...   May 26 2006, 01:45 PM
- - Geekkake   Absolutely not. The entire reason a reality filter...   May 26 2006, 03:55 PM
- - mdynna   Excellent response, I love it Geekkake. Additiona...   May 26 2006, 04:03 PM
- - Kanada Ten   So the question is can you run multiple personas w...   May 26 2006, 04:07 PM
- - Geekkake   QUOTE (Kanada Ten) So the question is can you run ...   May 26 2006, 04:15 PM
- - mdynna   @Geekkake: That's pretty much what I was think...   May 26 2006, 04:36 PM
- - hobgoblin   the problem of the nodes response is a similar pro...   May 26 2006, 04:37 PM
- - Kanada Ten   You could make that argument, but that'd be du...   May 26 2006, 04:38 PM
- - Geekkake   QUOTE (Kanada Ten) You could make that argument, b...   May 26 2006, 04:46 PM
- - mdynna   I suppose you could say that hacking with multiple...   May 26 2006, 05:27 PM
- - Geekkake   QUOTE (mdynna) I suppose you could say that hackin...   May 26 2006, 07:37 PM
- - Kanada Ten   Security hackers with 4 personas? I was thinking ...   May 26 2006, 07:43 PM
- - Edward   Geekkake that is what I would have thought but the...   May 27 2006, 02:33 AM
- - Kanada Ten   How do you synchronize with a free agent? Doesn...   May 27 2006, 02:38 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th March 2025 - 02:03 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.