Feb 7 2007, 12:21 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 2-January 07 From: Los Angeles, CA Member No.: 10,510 |
Is there any way we can logically restrict players from just copying all their software and giving it to their hacker friends or getting copies of software from their hacker friends? If we say "copy protection is nearly perfect in 2070", is that unreasonable? What about custom-designed software? If a hacker makes an agent, is there any logical argument for why he can't make 10,000 of them either to store on his comlink, keep as backups, or give away as Christmas presents?
What about spells formulas? What's to stop a mage from just logging onto www.freespells.com or the equivilent and downloading all their favorite open-source spells? If anyone would know the data havens that supply these, it's the shadowrunners. But I like the idea that spells and programs are "inventory", but I'm not sure if that really makes sense in 2070. I would also like to see rating-6 programs and spells as something fairly rare, rather than something that can just be downloaded off the Matrix or copied from a friend. Is there anyone who would have serious problems with just handwaiving these issues away with "future tech"? edit for clarification: I'm not necessarily looking for rules to solve these issues, just the fluff/reasoning behind it. |
|
|
|
cetiah Copy Protection Feb 7 2007, 12:21 AM
Ravor Well personally I don't have a problem with De... Feb 7 2007, 12:59 AM
Serbitar \signed Feb 7 2007, 01:05 AM
kzt It's possible to do something like this, but i... Feb 7 2007, 01:09 AM
Mistwalker I have no problem with PCs sharing software or spe... Feb 7 2007, 01:30 AM
Sir_Psycho Why don't we introduce some rules for copy pro... Feb 7 2007, 01:39 AM
cetiah QUOTE (Sir_Psycho @ Feb 6 2007, 08:39 PM) Why... Feb 7 2007, 01:51 AM
cetiah QUOTE (Mistwalker @ Feb 6 2007, 08:30 PM) I h... Feb 7 2007, 01:54 AM
Kyoto Kid ...hacker 1 breaks the copy protection gives copy ... Feb 7 2007, 02:06 AM
mfb i don't think it's necessary to use crazy ... Feb 7 2007, 03:07 AM
Mistwalker That is assuming that you are buying legal program... Feb 7 2007, 03:12 AM
mfb why wouldn't corps sell hacking programs? they... Feb 7 2007, 03:16 AM
kzt QUOTE (mfb @ Feb 6 2007, 08:16 PM) and even n... Feb 7 2007, 03:43 AM
mfb copy protection in SR is, universally, pretty easi... Feb 7 2007, 04:06 AM
Sir_Psycho QUOTE (cetiah) QUOTE (Sir_Psycho @ Feb 6 2007... Feb 7 2007, 10:57 AM
cetiah How do you guys feel about having a Hacker spend K... Feb 7 2007, 12:31 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Such hacker is called 'Technomancer' in SR... Feb 7 2007, 01:21 PM
ShadowDragon8685 QUOTE (cetiah) How do you guys feel about having a... Feb 7 2007, 01:50 PM
Dashifen I've found that the copy-protection described ... Feb 7 2007, 02:47 PM
Perssek Well, I donīt have a problem with that. The PCs ca... Feb 7 2007, 02:49 PM
Moon-Hawk QUOTE (cetiah) Or would it be better just to assum... Feb 7 2007, 03:25 PM
dog_xinu programs are copy protected but "hackers... Feb 7 2007, 07:09 PM
sunnyside A couple comments. First while they don't st... Feb 7 2007, 10:08 PM
Serbitar What about the following idea:
A hacker can inser... Feb 7 2007, 11:18 PM
cetiah QUOTE (Serbitar @ Feb 7 2007, 06:18 PM) What ... Feb 7 2007, 11:23 PM
Serbitar Well, thats what hackers do. Mages have initiation... Feb 7 2007, 11:30 PM
Pyritefoolsgold A couple of things:
I like the idea of programs th... Feb 8 2007, 02:25 AM
cetiah QUOTE (Pyritefoolsgold) A couple of things:
I like... Feb 8 2007, 03:01 AM
Spike I personally favor SOTA degredation of software (a... Feb 8 2007, 07:25 AM
shadowbod QUOTE (Pyritefoolsgold)And as far as spell formula... Feb 8 2007, 08:26 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th May 2026 - 09:16 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.