IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> A spell concept, Shrink [Item]
bibliophile20
post Jun 10 2007, 06:00 AM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,180
Joined: 22-January 07
From: Rochester, NY
Member No.: 10,737



I was watching The Sword in the Stone (the Disney classic) and came to one of my favorite scenes, where Merlin is packing--by means of shrinking all of his belongings so that they'll fit inside a single briefcase.

So, I present this idea for perusal, using the spell construction rules from SM:
Physical spell: +1
Touch Range: -2
Duration: Permanent: +2
Physical Manipulation: 0
Major Change: +2
_______________
Force/2 + 3

This spell will shrink a non-living target by [Force] degrees; i.e. a Force 3 spell will shrink them to 1/3 their present size, a Force 4 spell will shrink them to 1/4 their current size, etc. Mass, however, remains the same. An "Enlarge" spell (same drain) will reverse the effect.


This idea con be used, but I did it more as an exercise with the spell construction rules. So, thoughts?

____________________________________________

Modified after the discussion below:

Physical spell: +1
Touch Range: -2
Duration: Sustained: 0
Physical Manipulation: 0
Major Change: +2
_______________
Force/2 + 1

This spell will shrink a non-living target by a factor equal to the number of net hits over the object resistant threshold. For example, a commlink (resistance 3) will require five hits to reduce it's size by a factor of two. Additionally, for every order of magnitude increase in mass, there is a +1 to the threshold (base is 100 kg, so 1,000 kg would be +1 to the threshold, 10,000 kg would be +2, etc). So shrinking a car, much less a house, would be nearly impossible for anyone but a high level initiate (considering that this was inspired by a Merlin character, that seems appropriate). Mass also changes in proportion.

This post has been edited by bibliophile20: Jun 10 2007, 06:51 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- bibliophile20   A spell concept   Jun 10 2007, 06:00 AM
- - WearzManySkins   Hmm does this mean you can cast this on the Armor ...   Jun 10 2007, 06:12 AM
- - hyzmarca   I'm sorely tempted to make a living-target ver...   Jun 10 2007, 06:13 AM
- - laughingowl   Hmm: One permenant spells are supposed to return ...   Jun 10 2007, 06:26 AM
- - bibliophile20   QUOTE I'm sorely tempted to make a living-targ...   Jun 10 2007, 06:30 AM
- - bibliophile20   QUOTE (laughingowl) Hmm: One permenant spells are...   Jun 10 2007, 06:33 AM
- - hyzmarca   QUOTE (bibliophile20) QUOTE I'm sorely tempted...   Jun 10 2007, 07:47 AM
- - bibliophile20   @hyzmarca Hmm... Pym is that messed up, eh? Glad...   Jun 10 2007, 08:26 AM
- - hyzmarca   QUOTE (bibliophile20) @hyzmarca Hmm... Pym is tha...   Jun 10 2007, 09:52 AM
- - bibliophile20   I had heard that the Civil War arc was controversi...   Jun 10 2007, 03:56 PM
- - Catharz Godfoot   This would kinda go counter to the current functio...   Jun 10 2007, 04:18 PM
- - Lagomorph   There should be size limits based on force. Imagin...   Jun 10 2007, 04:51 PM
- - hyzmarca   QUOTE (bibliophile20 @ Jun 10 2007, 10:56 AM)...   Jun 10 2007, 05:29 PM
- - FrankTrollman   It's a permanent alteration, right? So it can ...   Jun 10 2007, 05:39 PM
- - hyzmarca   That is one of the reasons I support making it a s...   Jun 10 2007, 05:51 PM
- - bibliophile20   So, to avoid confusion, here's the spell broke...   Jun 10 2007, 06:50 PM
- - FrankTrollman   So to halve the size of the Earth, destroying all ...   Jun 10 2007, 08:03 PM
- - bibliophile20   QUOTE (FrankTrollman) So to halve the size of the ...   Jun 10 2007, 09:04 PM
- - hyzmarca   Make the threshold-increase mass linear instead of...   Jun 10 2007, 09:24 PM
- - bibliophile20   "inconsistent with the intent of SR4"? ...   Jun 10 2007, 09:42 PM
- - hyzmarca   SR4 was intended to be simple without any need for...   Jun 10 2007, 09:58 PM
- - odinson   QUOTE (Lagomorph) There should be size limits base...   Jun 10 2007, 11:08 PM
- - bibliophile20   QUOTE (hyzmarca) SR4 was intended to be simple wit...   Jun 10 2007, 11:29 PM
- - FrankTrollman   Yeah, under no circumstances am I going to raise P...   Jun 10 2007, 11:39 PM
- - bibliophile20   So have the threshold modifiers increase at +1 per...   Jun 10 2007, 11:48 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   QUOTE (Lagomorph) Here's some interesting info...   Jun 11 2007, 03:24 PM
- - laughingowl   Here's my take on it: Modified after the disc...   Jun 11 2007, 11:32 PM
- - hyzmarca   Shapechange has no problem making a person change ...   Jun 12 2007, 12:29 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th September 2025 - 11:40 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.