IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

AngelisStorm
post Sep 5 2007, 12:19 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 616
Joined: 30-April 07
From: Edge of the Redmond Barrens, Borderline NAN. Runnin' the border for literal milk runs.
Member No.: 11,565



Our player group has been batting around a question regarding Concealment and the Chameleon Suit. How invisible are they?

We've so far been treating the Chameleon suit similar to the cloaking armor in Ghost in the Shell. Effectively invisible, but less of if your moving.

Concealment I've been purposely not using (as a player) so we wouldn't have to deal with it. But finally we've decided we need to.

How many hits on a perception check do you require from your player to notice someone who is standing directly in front of them? Stupid sounding question, but depending on how the armor works, it might be a valid one. And the concealment power. Don't even know where to start on that one. I hate the "it's magic" arguement as sole justification, but the fact stands, it is magic.

How does everyone treat/handle these two? It's a silly question to ask if someone can see someone standing in the middle of a football field, but when special equipment/powers comes into play, where to start?

(Hope this was coherent, I have two people who just came home talking to me.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- AngelisStorm   How Invisible is Invisible?   Sep 5 2007, 12:19 AM
- - toturi   Are you taking the person as an object(as in not a...   Sep 5 2007, 12:25 AM
- - adamu   For the Concealment power - it is clearly not invi...   Sep 5 2007, 12:45 AM
- - Wasabi   My own 'take' on it is that if the oppposi...   Sep 5 2007, 12:58 AM
- - DTFarstar   I treat them both as a reflective light field- kin...   Sep 5 2007, 12:58 AM
- - Eleazar   Some food for thought. It was some advice I got a ...   Sep 5 2007, 01:02 AM
- - Wasabi   The penalty isnt too detecting infiltration its to...   Sep 5 2007, 01:07 AM
- - nathanross   Unlike the physical masking/invisibility devices, ...   Sep 5 2007, 05:06 AM
- - Buster   I think Concealment and the chameleon suit work mo...   Sep 5 2007, 12:45 PM
- - Doctor Funkenstein   QUOTE (AngelisStorm) Our player group has been bat...   Sep 5 2007, 02:15 PM
- - hyzmarca   QUOTE (nathanross) Unlike the physical masking/inv...   Sep 5 2007, 02:24 PM
- - toturi   QUOTE (hyzmarca) QUOTE (nathanross @ Sep 5 20...   Sep 5 2007, 02:31 PM
- - Eryk the Red   The chamelon suit is, as I understand it, reactive...   Sep 5 2007, 02:47 PM
- - hyzmarca   I think I just failed a spot check. I must assume...   Sep 5 2007, 03:05 PM
- - toturi   Obvious is not a synonym for immediately noticeabl...   Sep 5 2007, 03:22 PM
- - Big D   We've been through this several times. Could ...   Sep 5 2007, 04:59 PM
- - DTFarstar   I would like to interject that I should HOPE the a...   Sep 5 2007, 05:04 PM
- - James McMurray   QUOTE (DTFarstar) I would like to interject that I...   Sep 5 2007, 05:49 PM
- - Naysayer   In fact, he does. He is assumed to be "untrai...   Sep 5 2007, 06:23 PM
- - Hartbaine   Concealment- "Concealed subjects can see each...   Sep 5 2007, 06:24 PM
- - James McMurray   QUOTE (Naysayer) In fact, he does. He is assumed t...   Sep 5 2007, 06:48 PM
- - Hartbaine   Cuz it's true.   Sep 5 2007, 06:53 PM
- - Naysayer   QUOTE (James McMurray)QUOTE (Naysayer @ Sep 5...   Sep 5 2007, 07:10 PM
- - hyzmarca   QUOTE (Hartbaine @ Sep 5 2007, 01:24 PM) Conc...   Sep 5 2007, 07:29 PM
- - Hartbaine   I meant in terms of it being a physical magical ef...   Sep 5 2007, 07:35 PM
- - James McMurray   QUOTE (Naysayer) [QUOTE=James McMurray]Because in ...   Sep 5 2007, 07:59 PM
- - Lagomorph   I always saw concealment as a Someone Elses Proble...   Sep 5 2007, 10:57 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th August 2025 - 04:57 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.