Dec 5 2007, 06:29 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 560 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Pueblo Corporate Council Member No.: 8,332 |
You can enchant technological devices. So you could enchant a cyber-arm as a weapon focus, and then implant it to gain an advantage in unarmed combat. Or you could enchant it as a power focus, and then implant it. Theoretically, you could enchant a vehicle as a focus. But what kind of bonus would you gain from attacking with it as a weapon focus? Would you be able to use the bonus dice on a drive test when attempting to hit someone/something? Probably not. But at least spirits wouldn't have immunity to being rammed by that car. ;-)
So why don't we have general physical foci? A sword is enchanted so that you may wield it more effectively. Why not a car so that you may drive it more effectively? Or the obvious item - a gun? Lockpicks? Well... too many individual items. Most such enchantable items will fall outside of the shadowrunning profession. A bowling ball, jugglers' balls, a paintbrush, drumsticks, a violin, maybe skates... As for the bowling ball idea, what's this thing where the focus must remain in contact with the user in order to be effective? The ball's trajectory is set as soon as the ball is loosed from your hand. Would the ball suddenly veer off-course because it left contact with the adept? Same idea for the gun. Why no gun foci? Become one with the gun. I think this is a holdover from earlier editions, where weapon foci added damage. For this reason when a projectile left contact with the user, it would no longer be active, and would no longer get the bonus. In SR4, the only bonus dice are for the initial use of the skill. Of course, you couldn't do anything with these foci in astral space. "Sure, you can take your GMC Bulldog focus into astral space, but you can't start it up." So what do you think? Any reasons why we shouldn't do this? And what a non-weapon physical focus cost? |
|
|
|
wind_in_the_stones Physical focus? Dec 5 2007, 06:29 AM
Zhan Shi The Attunement: Item adept metamagic technique wou... Dec 5 2007, 06:36 AM
hyzmarca If you enchant a vehicle as a weapon focus the bon... Dec 5 2007, 06:38 AM
Kyoto Kid ...just wait till the Short One (#65...woohoo... Dec 5 2007, 06:54 AM
Stahlseele why not?
because those things are hellishly expans... Dec 5 2007, 10:08 AM
hyzmarca If you enchant a Gimp suit as a weapon focus and t... Dec 5 2007, 10:46 AM
WeaverMount About attunement
QUOTE Attunement, however, provi... Dec 5 2007, 01:44 PM
Sponge QUOTE (WeaverMount)About attunement
QUOTE Attunem... Dec 5 2007, 08:33 PM
wind_in_the_stones Heh. Good fun.
I wasn't very serious about... Dec 7 2007, 03:55 AM
Karaden My guess for the lack of ranged weapon foci is tha... Dec 7 2007, 04:49 AM
wind_in_the_stones QUOTE (Karaden) My guess for the lack of ranged we... Dec 9 2007, 04:47 AM
Karaden True, it is bounded to the user and not the victim... Dec 9 2007, 06:55 AM
Kingmaker I'd stay away from foci that give bonuses to m... Dec 9 2007, 08:19 PM
Ryu Slight clerical error there, I would absolutely en... Dec 10 2007, 10:38 PM
Stahlseele just curious, aside from magical thingies, obvious... Dec 10 2007, 10:41 PM
Karaden Hmm... no, I'm fairly certain that anything at... Dec 10 2007, 11:37 PM
Karaden To add a bit to my last statement..
There is a na... Dec 10 2007, 11:40 PM
Narse Can you get a bonus to gunnery via tech? Remember ... Dec 11 2007, 05:58 AM
Karaden Hmm.. ya, maybe gunnery, although I'd imagine ... Dec 11 2007, 06:09 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th February 2026 - 07:37 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.