Arsenal Cover, crappy or craptastic? |
Arsenal Cover, crappy or craptastic? |
Jan 27 2008, 10:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 271 Joined: 18-April 06 Member No.: 8,481 |
Looking at the cover of Arsenal, I'm not surprised. Shadowrun has a history of kinda silly, cartoony art, after all.
What I wonder (and maybe a dev could answer) is whether they use that kind of art on purpose, anymore? Gone are the internet-free days of the late 80's when it might be hard to locate and retain a good artist. There are hundreds of underemployed artists that could do the work, so it's not lack of people. Is the current SR team sticking with the cartoony art just to keep up the Shadowrun tradition of having campy, cartoony art? Or is there some other motive for not updating the art style? This post has been edited by Redjack: Feb 2 2008, 08:29 PM
Reason for edit: Add sr4 icon
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th January 2025 - 05:51 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.