IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

TKDNinjaInBlack
post Sep 8 2008, 07:50 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 8-September 08
From: St. Louis, UCAS
Member No.: 16,329



According the core rule book, augmenting a physical attribute by one rating point with the adept power "improved physical attribute" costs 1 adept power point.

However, the second paragraph states:

"This power allows you to exceed your natural attribute maximum up to the augmented maximum, but each point over the maximum costs double (2 power points per level)."

Now here is where I get confused. The maximum that is used in the second part of the sentence could mean either the natural maximum or the augmented maximum because both are used in the previous part of the sentence. Depending on which one it is, this could create two scenarios. If;

1:) the maximum it is referring to is the natural maximum, it causes some problems with when a player would purchase this power.

examples. Character X (human) has Agility 3 and improved physical attribute level 3. His Agility would be 3 (6). The cost in adept power points would be 3.
However, Character Y (human) has Agility 6 and improved physical attribute level 3. His Agility is 6 (9), but the cost in adept power points he spent was 6.

Ideally, if you wanted to avoid the jump in cost, you'd build a character with a lower agility at the start gate, and buy your max levels in this power first. Then you'd up your natural agility with karma. You'd have to pay for the equivalent augmented target rating when improving with karma, but it is still way cheaper than having to up further levels of magic (especially when you add in initiation costs). So with this tactic and using the examples above, Character Y could have his agility 6 (9) merely and only pay 3 adept power points for it if he was just careful with in what order he improved his character. This seems unfair and confusing. Why punish a character who wanted to beef up his natural attribute before augmenting it with adept powers?

the other possible meaning that could be taken from this second paragraph is 2:) that the maximum being referred to is the augmented maximum. This would make the above problem null and void and make the order of operations for improving a character less costly in the long run. But, it would allow Players to create adept characters that spend all of their karma on upping magic in order to further improve their attributes BEYOND the augmented maximums. In the long run, it is impossible to make this efficient as the amount of karma spent on further magic levels and initiation would be astronomical and the GM really wouldn't have to worry about this becoming too much of a problem. The thing that bothers me about this scenario though, is that the first part of the sentence in that second paragraph is worded to make the reader think that they can use this power to only take it "up to" the augmented max.

I've been playing SR4 for about 2 1/2 years now and this problem has always plagued me but I really didn't press the issue as I GMed more than played. I am creating an adept martial artist/infiltration ninja for a new campaign and would like to have this ironed out before I finish the creation process so I know where to go with my BP and adept points.

I'd really like help with this misunderstanding, especially from a developer if they are around. I've read the forum a bit, but am a first time poster and hope it won't affect my topic being passed up.

Thanks in advance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- TKDNinjaInBlack   Adept Improved Physical Attribute   Sep 8 2008, 07:50 PM
- - Dr. Funkenstein   Your augmented maximum is just that; the maximum y...   Sep 8 2008, 07:53 PM
- - Ryu   Welcome on DS. Regarding your question, see that ...   Sep 8 2008, 07:56 PM
- - ArkonC   Also, if you have Str 3 and buy improved Str, you ...   Sep 8 2008, 07:59 PM
- - HappyDaze   I'd suggest houseruling this power to function...   Sep 8 2008, 08:09 PM
- - Muspellsheimr   By RAW, this is by far the worst Power. Comparabl...   Sep 8 2008, 08:14 PM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   In General, yes, the rule does "suck ass,...   Sep 8 2008, 08:19 PM
- - Muspellsheimr   This Adept Power is an exception to that rule - it...   Sep 8 2008, 08:28 PM
- - HappyDaze   QUOTE This Adept Power is an exception to that rul...   Sep 8 2008, 08:31 PM
|- - SpasticTeapot   QUOTE (HappyDaze @ Sep 8 2008, 03:31 PM) ...   Sep 8 2008, 10:26 PM
|- - Tarantula   QUOTE (SpasticTeapot @ Sep 8 2008, 03:26 ...   Sep 8 2008, 10:28 PM
- - Isath   Indeed, this power appears somewhat worthless - at...   Sep 8 2008, 10:16 PM
- - Jackstand   I think that the most favorable light in which to ...   Sep 8 2008, 11:44 PM
- - Dr. Funkenstein   I'd rather use the Power Point for... just abo...   Sep 8 2008, 11:50 PM
|- - Jackstand   QUOTE (Dr. Funkenstein @ Sep 8 2008, 06:5...   Sep 9 2008, 03:00 AM
- - Glyph   Yeah, the RAW rules stink. And I'm not one of...   Sep 9 2008, 01:47 AM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   No, I really know this power sucks ass. It's ...   Sep 9 2008, 02:56 AM
|- - ArkonC   QUOTE (TKDNinjaInBlack @ Sep 9 2008, 04:5...   Sep 9 2008, 08:11 AM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   I see what's confusing you. By total attribut...   Sep 9 2008, 01:08 PM
- - Isath   My comparison was not ment to imply that every ade...   Sep 9 2008, 01:54 PM
- - Dr. Funkenstein   I seriously doubt many people would argue that poi...   Sep 9 2008, 04:31 PM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   No, I absolutely hear you on that. I am a big fan...   Sep 9 2008, 06:21 PM
- - HappyDaze   QUOTE critical strike (which is awesome for the co...   Sep 9 2008, 08:38 PM
|- - Skip   QUOTE (HappyDaze @ Sep 9 2008, 04:38 PM) ...   Sep 9 2008, 10:39 PM
- - Wakshaani   Gotta say that I'm on the bandwagon for the 0....   Sep 9 2008, 10:53 PM
|- - Muspellsheimr   QUOTE (Wakshaani @ Sep 9 2008, 04:53 PM) ...   Sep 9 2008, 10:57 PM
|- - ArkonC   QUOTE (Muspellsheimr @ Sep 10 2008, 12:57...   Sep 9 2008, 11:06 PM
- - HappyDaze   QUOTE However, 0.5 would be too cheap compared to ...   Sep 9 2008, 11:22 PM
- - Stahlseele   ok, so now you've lessened the cost for two mo...   Sep 9 2008, 11:24 PM
- - HappyDaze   Nothing. By RAW they have plenty of an advantage ...   Sep 9 2008, 11:26 PM
- - Stahlseele   main reason for the adept stuff being priced as it...   Sep 9 2008, 11:30 PM
|- - Rasumichin   QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Sep 9 2008, 11:30 PM)...   Sep 10 2008, 07:58 PM
- - HappyDaze   QUOTE main reason for the adept stuff being priced...   Sep 9 2008, 11:41 PM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   I keep hearing a whole lot about balance and chang...   Sep 10 2008, 01:33 AM
- - Glyph   I have to disagree with that interpretation. It s...   Sep 10 2008, 01:42 AM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   yeah, that pretty much trounces what I said. Than...   Sep 10 2008, 02:09 AM
- - HappyDaze   QUOTE Whatever happened to trusting the developers...   Sep 10 2008, 02:18 AM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   Alright, we've established that Improved attri...   Sep 10 2008, 02:23 AM
- - Muspellsheimr   If you use Improved Physical Attribute to bring an...   Sep 10 2008, 02:31 AM
- - HappyDaze   Nothing. But you're still eating a high cost ...   Sep 10 2008, 02:34 AM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   Yeah, I know which one I'd pick too. Plus, wi...   Sep 10 2008, 03:53 AM
- - HappyDaze   QUOTE Plus, with your math there, the first exampl...   Sep 10 2008, 03:57 AM
- - TKDNinjaInBlack   my bad, I thought the magic was rating 5. Nope, y...   Sep 10 2008, 03:59 AM
- - Muspellsheimr   Okay, just because I am curious, is there anyone t...   Sep 10 2008, 04:04 AM
|- - Jackstand   QUOTE (Muspellsheimr @ Sep 9 2008, 11:04 ...   Sep 10 2008, 07:40 PM
- - HappyDaze   Is there anyone that does not agree that water is ...   Sep 10 2008, 04:09 AM
- - ArkonC   Well, I think it rules...I also think Teletubbies ...   Sep 10 2008, 09:35 AM
- - BullZeye   Last I checked, SR4 isn't a PvP game so who ca...   Sep 10 2008, 10:15 AM
|- - Dr. Funkenstein   QUOTE (BullZeye @ Sep 10 2008, 05:15 AM) ...   Sep 10 2008, 11:12 AM
- - Stahlseele   just to make sure: is there any way to find out wh...   Sep 10 2008, 08:54 PM
- - Tarantula   Watch them and wait.   Sep 10 2008, 08:59 PM
- - Stahlseele   that's a no then i suppose. aside from being a...   Sep 10 2008, 09:18 PM
- - Ryu   Yes, as long as the adept in question knows the li...   Sep 10 2008, 09:26 PM
|- - Rasumichin   QUOTE (Ryu @ Sep 10 2008, 09:26 PM) Yes, ...   Sep 11 2008, 01:26 AM
- - Jackstand   You could ask him, politely.   Sep 10 2008, 11:41 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th June 2025 - 05:57 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.