 Licenses, How much is too much? |
 Mar 4 2010, 12:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target  Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 28-August 08 Member No.: 16,286  |
I have noticed that a lot of items that the normal shadowrunner uses is restricted or forbidden. I am running the Denver missions and my crew has crossed boarders twice now. My question is for all the stuff that is restricted do they need a separate license for each or can they buy say a security license that covers most items that a private security outfit would use? Also when you are scanned if you have to buy a separate license for everything do they scan each license causing the players to have to roll like 10-12 license checks or is it one scan on their fake SIN?
|
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
Tsithlis Licenses Mar 4 2010, 12:05 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Licences go by type ("firearms licence")... Mar 4 2010, 12:55 PM
FriendoftheDork QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 4 2010, 01... Mar 4 2010, 01:42 PM Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (FriendoftheDork @ Mar 4 2010, 03:4... Mar 4 2010, 01:46 PM FriendoftheDork QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 4 2010, 02... Mar 4 2010, 04:11 PM Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (FriendoftheDork @ Mar 4 2010, 06:1... Mar 4 2010, 05:20 PM forgarn QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 4 2010, 12... Mar 4 2010, 05:47 PM Tsithlis that seems reasonable but what about license scann... Mar 4 2010, 12:56 PM Rotbart van Dainig Since I'm using a house rule that a check is n... Mar 4 2010, 01:12 PM Aerospider I would think the one scan on their SIN should be ... Mar 4 2010, 01:16 PM Rotbart van Dainig Yes, really: "type of item" is pretty cl... Mar 4 2010, 05:50 PM forgarn QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 4 2010, 12... Mar 4 2010, 06:06 PM Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (forgarn @ Mar 4 2010, 08:06 PM) Th... Mar 4 2010, 06:47 PM FriendoftheDork QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 4 2010, 07... Mar 4 2010, 08:19 PM Tymeaus Jalynsfein QUOTE (forgarn @ Mar 4 2010, 11:06 AM) We... Mar 5 2010, 02:08 AM D2F QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 4 2010, 06... Mar 4 2010, 08:31 PM Rotbart van Dainig QUOTE (D2F @ Mar 4 2010, 10:31 PM) The te... Mar 4 2010, 08:54 PM Muspellsheimr QUOTE (D2F @ Mar 4 2010, 01:31 PM) The wa... Mar 4 2010, 10:37 PM X-Kalibur I would say that restricted items can have a blank... Mar 4 2010, 06:10 PM Bull Generally, I run with only a handful of Licenses n... Mar 4 2010, 06:42 PM X-Kalibur By RAW I can talk a starving Wendigo down. I don... Mar 4 2010, 07:02 PM Nows7 Let's see, I'm running with a "Spell ... Mar 4 2010, 07:34 PM X-Kalibur Also, for those arguing you need a liscense for ea... Mar 4 2010, 08:27 PM forgarn QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ Mar 4 2010, 03:27... Mar 4 2010, 09:53 PM Muspellsheimr QUOTE (forgarn @ Mar 4 2010, 02:53 PM) Th... Mar 4 2010, 10:45 PM Blog [Runner] "Oh i have the proper permit for tha... Mar 4 2010, 08:53 PM Khyron I don't agree with RAW necessarily, but it doe... Mar 4 2010, 09:09 PM Rotbart van Dainig It#s not like the archetype haven't been contr... Mar 4 2010, 09:33 PM SpellBinder Yes, but said Street Sam has two licenses for two ... Mar 4 2010, 09:46 PM Rotbart van Dainig It looks indeed horrible enough with a licence for... Mar 4 2010, 09:49 PM X-Kalibur Yes, but if I am pulled over and fined for a traff... Mar 4 2010, 09:59 PM forgarn QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ Mar 4 2010, 04:59... Mar 4 2010, 10:23 PM Ascalaphus If you take all of this together, what you get is ... Mar 5 2010, 08:30 PM Daylen one lisence. seperate fees for every item register... Mar 5 2010, 10:34 PM Mantis I've done the Denver missions campaign. It han... Mar 5 2010, 11:34 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th November 2025 - 04:16 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.