Mar 6 2010, 12:50 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 556 Joined: 28-May 04 From: Moorhead, MN, USA Member No.: 6,367 |
I mostly started thinking about this in regards to program maximums. Folks said that they could just have their PCs spend some downtime and create rating umpteen stealth programs and rule the matrix. But the books say that rating 7+ are uber secret miltech things. "Why is that?" I wondered. Perhaps I could say that everything with a rating needs to be made by a person with the appropriate skill equal to or greater than that rating. It's a bit of karma, but game mechanically easy to get a skill of 6, hence rating 6 programs are available. It takes, what, 48 more karma (aptitude plus double advancement costs) to get to a skill of 7? Uber enough that you could call that bleeding edge secret stuff. Adept magic can get you to a skill of 9 or even 10, but it's probably uncommon to have an adept waste his points and possibly a ton of karma in a nerd skill. Yet a rating 10 program could exist by this ruling.
Now questions for which I need feedback. (And flames. Don't forget the flames.): How would this After programs, to what items should or could I generalize it? (Focuses, nanotech, cybertech, everything but acceleration, speed, body/structure, armor, and DP?) Is this reasonable? Any other criticisms/feedback? Thanks, Da9 [edited] |
|
|
|
Da9iel Houserule opinions, please. Mar 6 2010, 12:50 AM
AndyZ While I don't feel I can directly explain this... Mar 6 2010, 11:24 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Unwired errata explains why cracked programs degra... Mar 6 2010, 11:32 PM
Da9iel RE: Degredation
Pre-errata: Patching is not hard. ... Mar 6 2010, 11:35 PM
Tymeaus Jalynsfein QUOTE (Da9iel @ Mar 6 2010, 04:35 PM) RE:... Mar 7 2010, 12:00 AM
Da9iel RvD:
In regards to maximum ratings, I only found a... Mar 7 2010, 08:30 PM
Rotbart van Dainig Those are not what characters will likely build, i... Mar 7 2010, 10:58 PM
toturi Aren't such tests Extended? Mar 8 2010, 02:43 AM
Tymeaus Jalynsfein QUOTE (toturi @ Mar 7 2010, 07:43 PM) Are... Mar 8 2010, 02:57 AM
Da9iel Just a quick clarity check. toturi: did you mentio... Mar 8 2010, 02:53 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd June 2026 - 11:29 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.