Nov 2 2010, 01:48 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,150 Joined: 15-December 09 Member No.: 17,968 |
Does anyone else think that banishing and counterspelling foci being category-specific makes them rather unattractive?
It's different for all the others because the user can make them useful, but these two are right-implement-right-time affairs. Let's take the banishing focus, costing 5k and 3 karma per force. So 15,000 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) and 9 karma gets you a tasty F3 fire-banishing focus. And how oftem will you use it? Let's assume all spirit types are equally prevalent and that summoners don't have a bias towards lots of different or lots of the same spirit. Then, if you come up against one spirit there's a 10% chance you get a banishing bonus. If you come up against two from the same summoner there's an 18% chance you get a bonus against at least one of them and if it's three spirits it's still less than 25% that one of them will be a fire spirit. That's pretty damn poor for the outlay, and the prepared-for-anything guy needs 10 foci with a karma cost well into the double, maybe triple digits and a cash expenditure of (probably) over 100k. All for a just few extra dice. Consequently, I envisage that in the Sixth World most banishing and counterspelling foci earn their keep more in the role of mantlepiece-conversation-starter than in the role they were enchanted for. Does anyone see any major unbalancing by removing the category limitation? Should the price and/or karma cost increase? |
|
|
|
Aerospider Banishing and Counterspelling Foci Nov 2 2010, 01:48 PM
darthmord Well, making them general use foci would increase ... Nov 2 2010, 01:57 PM
pbangarth QUOTE (darthmord @ Nov 2 2010, 09:57 AM) ... Nov 2 2010, 02:19 PM
Warlordtheft I always read that the counterspelling and banishi... Nov 2 2010, 02:07 PM
Warlordtheft QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Nov 2 2010, 10:07 A... Nov 3 2010, 01:13 PM
Aerospider QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Nov 3 2010, 01:13 P... Nov 3 2010, 01:51 PM
Draco18s QUOTE (Aerospider @ Nov 3 2010, 08:51 AM)... Nov 3 2010, 04:34 PM
Tymeaus Jalynsfein QUOTE (Draco18s @ Nov 3 2010, 10:34 AM) S... Nov 3 2010, 10:33 PM
pbangarth If I were a magician with a Negative Quality such ... Nov 2 2010, 02:12 PM
Summerstorm And with the counterspelling foci: How much do you... Nov 2 2010, 04:07 PM
Tymeaus Jalynsfein QUOTE (Summerstorm @ Nov 2 2010, 10:07 AM... Nov 3 2010, 02:33 AM
Mäx QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Nov 3 2010, 04... Nov 3 2010, 08:58 AM
Mäx Yeah, +5 dice to counterspell combat spells for 25... Nov 2 2010, 04:54 PM
Summerstorm Well, yeah... but you need shielding to use it. Nov 3 2010, 09:14 AM
Warlordtheft Surprisingly even with this misunderstanding, none... Nov 3 2010, 02:00 PM
Warlordtheft Actually detection, illusion, manipulation and hea... Nov 3 2010, 06:52 PM
Draco18s QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Nov 3 2010, 01:52 P... Nov 3 2010, 07:11 PM
Ascalaphus I can get behind making Banishing a general focus.... Nov 3 2010, 10:58 PM
tagz QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Nov 3 2010, 10:58 PM)... Nov 3 2010, 11:38 PM
Whipstitch Manipulations and Combat may have all the "Sa... Nov 3 2010, 11:10 PM
Mäx That actually paints a pretty cool picture of a ba... Nov 4 2010, 09:04 AM
Jaid QUOTE (Mäx @ Nov 4 2010, 05:04 AM) That a... Nov 5 2010, 05:09 PM
Ascalaphus Cool picture, maybe. Viable and powerful enough? I... Nov 4 2010, 09:44 AM
Summerstorm Ah... but if he binds over his (magic*2) in force ... Nov 4 2010, 09:51 AM
Mäx QUOTE (Summerstorm @ Nov 4 2010, 11:51 AM... Nov 4 2010, 12:18 PM
Whipstitch Yeah, I mean, I was raised Catholic but if anythin... Nov 5 2010, 07:02 PM
Ascalaphus Prayer beads are a convenient way to keep track of... Nov 6 2010, 12:34 AM
Whipstitch QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Nov 5 2010, 07:34 PM)... Nov 6 2010, 01:42 AM
thezombiekat Even if I had all the banishing foci I probably wo... Nov 6 2010, 12:57 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2026 - 11:05 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.