IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Question regarding Magic loss through lowered Essence, Is it a modification or effective loss?
StevenAngier
post Jul 11 2011, 12:54 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 14-June 11
Member No.: 31,414



So, while discussing the Chummer Character Generator the question arose what exactly happens if you lose your Magic rating through Essence loss.

AFAIS there are two possible options.

a) You rating is simply lowered in every regard. Thus, if you get the chance to raise it again you have to pay the karma cost of the new rating.

Example?
You have magic 4. It gets lowered to 3 as you got some augmentations implanted. Next time you want to raise Magic back to 4 you have to pay 20 Karma. (New Rating * 5)


or


b) Your "effective" rating is lowered while the rating for karma cost calculations stays the same. If you want to raise it again you have to pay the karma cost for raising your "old" rating.

Example?
You have magic 4. It gets lowered to 3 as you got some augmentations implanted. Next time you want to raise Magic back to 4 you have to pay 25 Karma. Without Essence loss you would have gotten a rating of 5 so it would be 5 * 5 Karma.


What's now the ruling on that? Which of those two options is the right one? Is there any clear ruling on that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- StevenAngier   Question regarding Magic loss through lowered Essence   Jul 11 2011, 12:54 PM
- - Machiavelli   Version 1 my friend. Rules can be found at "i...   Jul 11 2011, 12:57 PM
|- - StevenAngier   QUOTE (Machiavelli @ Jul 11 2011, 02:57 P...   Jul 11 2011, 12:58 PM
- - Machiavelli   ähm...see above. Edited it too slow.^^   Jul 11 2011, 12:59 PM
- - StevenAngier   Sounds reasonable. Yet it seems like Magic and Res...   Jul 11 2011, 01:04 PM
- - Ascalaphus   Magic/Resonance aren't "inhibited" b...   Jul 11 2011, 03:44 PM
|- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Jul 11 2011, 09:44 AM...   Jul 11 2011, 04:30 PM
- - Ascalaphus   It makes sense to do both or neither.. you could r...   Jul 11 2011, 09:41 PM
|- - Mäx   QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Jul 12 2011, 12:41 AM...   Jul 12 2011, 11:50 AM
- - StevenAngier   Yeah well... the thing that Essence loss is a bit ...   Jul 11 2011, 09:53 PM
|- - Ascalaphus   QUOTE (StevenAngier @ Jul 11 2011, 10:53 ...   Jul 11 2011, 10:48 PM
|- - StevenAngier   QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Jul 12 2011, 12:48 AM...   Jul 12 2011, 12:48 PM
|- - darthmord   QUOTE (StevenAngier @ Jul 12 2011, 08:48 ...   Jul 21 2011, 10:05 PM
- - Glyph   That tactic might technically be cheaper, but it w...   Jul 12 2011, 02:43 AM
- - Yerameyahu   Yeah. I don't worry too much about the potenti...   Jul 12 2011, 03:41 AM
- - Ascalaphus   I mentioned it because we've had several discu...   Jul 12 2011, 06:46 AM
- - Irion   @Glyph For a mage? Yes, indeed. An adept is quite ...   Jul 12 2011, 08:35 AM
- - StevenAngier   Well it leads to detaching from your character at ...   Jul 12 2011, 10:07 AM
- - Irion   @StevenAngier I do not get your argumentation. If ...   Jul 12 2011, 10:34 AM
- - Irion   @Mäx If I first get 4 Points of ware and afterward...   Jul 12 2011, 12:05 PM
|- - Mäx   QUOTE (Irion @ Jul 12 2011, 03:05 PM) @Mä...   Jul 12 2011, 12:13 PM
- - Irion   @Mäx Why? The latent XXX qualities state, that yo...   Jul 12 2011, 12:25 PM
|- - Mäx   QUOTE (Irion @ Jul 12 2011, 03:25 PM) @Mä...   Jul 12 2011, 12:51 PM
- - Ascalaphus   @Max: * Buy Adept * Buy Magic 2 (10) * Buy 1 Esse...   Jul 12 2011, 12:31 PM
- - Yerameyahu   Like I said, Ascalaphus: that can't happen in ...   Jul 12 2011, 01:22 PM
- - Irion   @Mäx QUOTE Going with this nonsense of order matte...   Jul 12 2011, 01:24 PM
|- - Mäx   QUOTE (Irion @ Jul 12 2011, 04:24 PM) The...   Jul 12 2011, 02:01 PM
||- - Tymeaus Jalynsfein   QUOTE (Mäx @ Jul 12 2011, 07:01 AM) You d...   Jul 12 2011, 02:04 PM
|- - Nebular   QUOTE (Irion @ Jul 12 2011, 08:24 AM) @Mä...   Jul 21 2011, 04:38 PM
- - Ascalaphus   QUOTE (StevenAngier @ Jul 12 2011, 01:48 ...   Jul 12 2011, 02:21 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th November 2024 - 09:10 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.