IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Canon Revision Project: Combat Mechanics, thread 2, I will lose you if you don't lose me.
Arethusa
post May 7 2004, 06:01 AM
Post #1


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Canon Revision Project: Combat Mechanics, thread 2
Here we go again.

For those of you who have no idea what this is about, visit the last thread. This is an attempt to rewrite canon to fix the glaringly unrealistic, horribly broken, and enourmously wrong elements in the Shadowrun system. Though I originally had gotten into this simply planning to rewrite the guns to make them internally consistent, it soon turned into a project to fix Shadowrun's incontrovertible mess of broken combat mechanics. This project may go further; certainly, not absolutely everything is wrong with the Shadowrun system, but there are many things beyond combat needing work, from cyberware (eg 0.75 essence radios, cyberlimbs, mnemonic enhancer) to magic to small, miscellaneous rules (eg the difference between physical and visual searches). But, for now, the focus is on rewriting the combat mechanics to something realistic but still playable— and still faithful to the saner elements in canon.

The project's still going, and I'm still working on nailing down the issues that need to be tackled. But, first, to avoid repetition of issues already discussed (and some relatively solved):

Armor, Called Shots, and Hit Locations: I will be subdividing armor into specific bodily locations with separate values for each area. FFBA will no longer give 4 points of ballistic across the whole body with a full suit.

As for specific subdivisions, I haven't nailed down how many or where. Probably something along the lines of Torso/Legs/Arms/Head being +2/+3/+4/+5, though I'm considering +1/+2/+3/+5 or even leaving head at +4. With a comprehensive table of modifiers for vision and combat conditions— and a GM to make use of them— these could really be sufficient to make headshots largely ineffective in combat without being unnecessarily impossible. Each area hit will have its own set of effects for staging and power, and crippling hits to limbs will double the penalty to all actions taken solely with that limb and incur a 1.5x wound modifier penalty to actions involving that limb. No limb hit can do more than Deadly damage (Deadly being effectively hitting an artery or taking off a limb).

On normal attacks, will be using a 2d6 system rolled for each attack to determine where the shot lands, and it'll probably be similar to Raygun's setup. Yes, 3d6 offers more fine tuning, but in the context of this project, elegance is something of a necessity. Still, may change my mind on that.

Armor layering will likely be done per body region, but otherwise kept mechanically identical to canon. Body will be used to calculate how much armor you can wear effectively, not Quickness. Lastly, I'll be changing the mechanics to cause armor to impede movement from the start; you should not be walking around with an absolute minimum of armor at all times unless you decide that the tradeoffs are worth it.

Lastly, overall body armor will be calculated per some simple formula I've yet to devise, and will be used mainly for explosions, getting hit by cars, etc.

Auto Fire: I still have no idea where this is going. At present, the viable suggested systems have largely come down to two: Austere's system of breaking down autofire into bursts and Dashifen's system of hitting with all bullets up to the highest roll. To best honest, I have a number of issues here with pretty much every system I've seen, and how this is going to be handled is very much up in the air in my mind.

Semi Auto and Burst Fire: Basically, treat weapon skill as a pool that refreshes at the beginning of each Simple Action; per Simple Action, go ahead and fire as many shots as you can distribute pool to. Normal combat pool and recoil rules still apply. Credit to Person 404 for working on this with me.

Weapon ROF: Initially, I was opposed to factoring this in past a max number of rounds per 3 second interval, but I've really ended up changing my mind on this one. Weapon ROF in rounds per minute will be (naturally) divided by 20 to get rounds per 3 seconds, and this will then be further divided by the number of combat phases a combatant gets to determine the number of rounds he or she can fire per combat phase. In order to keep things sensible and acceptably streamlined, all of this will be calculated ahead of time and provided as part of the weapon's stats. If you want to run 1.5 or 1 second combat turns, I'm afraid you'll have to divide things further yourself, though that's obviously not very hard.

Weapon Recoil: Weapon recoil will probably be capped at Austere's suggestion of 4 + (3 * Weapon Recoil Modifier). eg assault rifles incur +1 recoil per shot, maxing out recoil at +7; a battle rifle or MMG incurs +2 recoil per shot, maxing out at 10. An HMG would incur +3 per shot, maxing out at 13. Firing on SA removes the base +4. Also, weapon attachments won't all factor straight into RC as per canon. Attachments like vertical foregrips will probably lower max recoil and max aiming actions by 1 or 2; attachments like bipods would lower max recoil and recoil generated per shot, depending on the weapon. All of this is still fairly malleable, however.

Additionally, I'll be using something similar to Raygun's RC by Reaction table, and I'll be using Strength based RC to feed right into recoil caps.

Also, expect GV4 and shock pads and all related silliness to go into the corner and shoot itself.

Ammunition: There will be seven types of ammunition: Light, Medium, and Heavy Pistol, Shotgun, and Light, Medium, and Heavy Rifle. Hell of a lot simpler than gigantic mess of different types. I won't be naming calibers, but for those who really are interested, Light Pistol will perform something in the vicinity of .22LR; Medium Pistol, 9mmP; Heavy Pistol, .357SIG, 10mmAuto, or .45ACP; Shotgun, 3" 12ga.; Light Rifle, 5.56x45mm NATO or 6.8mmSPC; Medium Rifle, 7.62x51mm NATO; Heavy, .50BMG. There will, of course, be guns firing custom ammunition types, but they'll be relatively uncommon.

I'm also curious if anyone would like to see shotguns broken down into Light, Medium, and Heavy variants, analogous to real life's 20, 12, and 10 gauges. All the other ammunition types get it, so I don't really see it being that much of an overcomplication, but I'm curious if anyone really cares one way or the other.

Rifles will get a 0.75 armor modifier, lowered to either 0.25 or 0.5 with AP (haven't decided which). I believe that this is pretty close to what Raygun uses, and it's simple enough to fit into the scope of this project. Hey, I love 3 part damage codes, but not here. I'm not sure where to go with pistol rounds (in terms of AP), at the moment. As for all other ammunition types, expect something realistic and an end to the silliness of flechette ammunition.

CQB and Weapon Handling: <=15m, all pistols receive -1TN; SMGs and carbines are the baseline, receiving +0TN; all full size rifles receive +1TN (I wanted to differentiate between carbines and full size rifles, but +2 is just too much); an LMG would receive +2TN; MMGs would receive +3TN; HMGs and heavy weapons, +4 and beyond. At <=5m, all CQB bonuses and penalties are doubled, and lighting, recoil, and called shot modifiers are halved, rounded up. Alternatively, could change the distances to 10m and 1m, respectively, but I think that may be fairly useless.

Shotguns: Completely ditching variable choke and it's area of effect swath of 2D. Thanks to Austere for the following numbers:
  • -1 TN to hit at Short and Medium range; -2 at Long; -3 at Extreme
  • Laser sights, reflex sights, and Smartlinks all give -1 TN (max of -1).
  • Damage stages down at -2 Power/-1 Damage Level per range category. May consider -1 Power instead; I'm not sure if this makes shotguns too weak.
  • Apply either double Ballistic or double Impact if the target as more than 1 point of either (ie at least 2, barring something completely weird).

Launch/Heavy Weapons: Will be increasing the power of most launch weapons and making most of them antivehicular (with possibly a couple exceptions; after all, the real life RPG-7 is basically an antipersonnel weapon). Also will be adding something along the lines of HIWS (as seen at Blackwater), mostly because it rocks.

Speed in Melee: Will probably be running with either a combination of Lime's system of requiring a simple action to counter attack and my system of Speed Reach or just Speed Reach. Either way, do not discuss this here. There's already a thread. Credit to Person 404 and another guy who's probably not going to post here for some time for putting together Speed Reach with me.

Explosives: Credit to Austere on these suggestions:
  • Blast radius: -2/m
  • Compared against 1x barrier rating
  • Commercial Explosives (eg Semtex, TNT) are rating 6; C4 is rating 7; C12 is rating 10
To some degree, I wonder if these figures are lethal enough (100+ kilos of C4 needed to punch a meter wide hole through a reenforced cement wall), but for now, I'm ok with them. And factoring in each Demolitions success giving +25% Power, they might just be dangerous enough.

Could use some suggestions for rules on shaped charges, though there's the possibility that leaving Demolitions to handle this per successes does it well enough currently, albeit at an abstract level.

As for thermobaric explosives (again, thanks to Austere):
  • Constant damage code blast radius: Rating * (kg/10) ^ 0.5
  • Blast radius beyond this: -2/m
  • Damage code: (Rating * 2)D
  • Cost/Availability: (Rating ^ 2 * 3)¥ / Rating * 2, 7 days
  • Minimum rating 2; maximum rating 6

Also, will have rules for improvised, cheap explosives. Specifically, fertilizer-based explosives at Rating 4 and its purified cousin, ammonium nitrate, at Rating 5. 20¥/kg for the former, 35¥/kg for the latter. Both quite accessible, easily detectible, and, if I can work out simple rules for it, fairly unstable.

Grenades: I'm either going with setting grenades at 15S (minigrenades at 12S) and enforcing the optional staging rules (numbers courtesy of Austere) or going with two separate damage ratings of 10S(f) (-1/m) and 6S (-2/m), one for shrapnel and one for concussion, respectively. Not entirely sure on this one.

Also, Austere: was the 12S meant to reflect the 40mm or 20mm platform? I'm pretty much ditching 20mm and high capacity underbarrel grenade launchers, but I'm not not removing 20mm entirely.

Skills: I'll definitely be rewriting the canon table of skills in order to keep the level of division consistent. No more Sorcery.

Fatigue: Unless there's interest and acceptance for an additional damage track for fatigue (resistable by Body and Willpower, healed with rest)— and do let me know if there is— I'll be going with Austere's system:
QUOTE (Austere Emancipator)
Over Str x 5kg up to Str x 10kg, a character has +1 TN on all Quickness-related tests and Athletics, -1 Quickness for movement speed, -1 run modifier, gains Light Stun every (Body x 20) minutes.

Over Str x 10kg up to Str x 15kg, a character has the above modifers as well as modifiers as from a permanent Light Stun wound while encumbered, cannot run and gains an additional Light Stun every (Body x 5) minutes.

Over Str x 15kg up to Str x 20kg, a character has the above modifiers but a permanent Moderate Stun instead of a Light Stun and gains an additional Light Stun every (Body) minutes.

Over Str x 20kg, a character has the above modifiers but a permanent Serious Stun instead of Moderate and gains an additional Light Stun every (Body x 5) CTs.


And that is most of what's been covered thus far.

This time, I actually have a few specific questions, so here goes:
  • Any suggestions for altering (+3 Power / +1 Damage Level) / 3 rounds fired? This really falls in with any suggestions for altering autofire, which I'm open to.
  • Are there any special weapons that specifically need rewriting? The rocket pistol comes to mind.
  • Any suggestions for alternatives to searching fire's allowance of essentially only one round hitting? Not necessarily crucial; the staging modifications help ameliorate this.
  • Any suggestions for a more realistic alternative to hardened personnel armor?

That's all for now. Please, if you have any comments on the decisions made or suggestions for something not yet mentioned, don't hesitate to speak up. I'd very much like to see some community involvement that doesn't boil down to me and Austere chatting via the board.

Oh, by the way, 1 point to anyone who recognizes the thread subtitle, no Google allowed. Just because.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Arethusa   Canon Revision Project: Combat Mechanics, thread 2   May 7 2004, 06:01 AM
- - Eyeless Blond   QUOTE (Arethusa) Armor, Called Shots, and Hit Loca...   May 7 2004, 06:26 AM
- - Arethusa   I have to disagree. It sounds simpler in theory, ...   May 7 2004, 06:36 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   Re: Ammo, you might want to make that Light, Mediu...   May 7 2004, 06:50 AM
- - Eyeless Blond   To be fair, most of the "Called Shots Suxxorz...   May 7 2004, 07:37 AM
- - Crusher Bob   The impression I got of the 20mm grenades is that ...   May 7 2004, 07:39 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Crusher Bob)Maybe make the 9S and use 1d6 s...   May 7 2004, 07:45 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Austere Emancipator)you might want to make ...   May 7 2004, 08:06 AM
- - Eyeless Blond   Eh, you're probably right and I'm just bei...   May 7 2004, 08:07 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)Fuck that, Austere's system is...   May 7 2004, 08:12 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Eyeless Blond)Eh, you're probably right...   May 7 2004, 08:22 AM
- - Eyeless Blond   Heh, just thought I'd add in one last reply be...   May 7 2004, 08:23 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)don't forget you're using ...   May 7 2004, 08:28 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)Light, Medium, Precision, and Heav...   May 7 2004, 10:35 AM
- - Person 404   QUOTE On normal attacks, will be using a 2d6 syste...   May 7 2004, 11:07 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Eyeless Blond)I'm not forgetting anythi...   May 7 2004, 04:08 PM
- - Zazen   QUOTE (Person 404) QUOTE On normal attacks, will b...   May 7 2004, 04:08 PM
- - Lantzer   I tend to avoid such (armor/location) systems beca...   May 7 2004, 04:17 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Zazen)Me too. Waiting for the player to fin...   May 7 2004, 04:17 PM
- - Caine Hazen   Look some people need this type of realisim in the...   May 7 2004, 04:22 PM
- - Eyeless Blond   QUOTE (Arethusa) If the numbers are set up correct...   May 7 2004, 04:34 PM
- - Zazen   QUOTE (Arethusa) Seriously, keep in mind that armo...   May 7 2004, 04:37 PM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)Austere [...] sucks Thanks mate...   May 7 2004, 04:39 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Zazen) QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 7 2004, 1...   May 7 2004, 04:42 PM
- - BitBasher   QUOTE Well, I'm keeping that in mind. If the n...   May 7 2004, 04:49 PM
- - Zazen   QUOTE I'm hoping a large human outline in the ...   May 7 2004, 04:51 PM
- - mcb   I don't think you should drop the variable cho...   May 7 2004, 04:53 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Austere Emancipator)Thing is, though, a .50...   May 7 2004, 05:01 PM
- - Entropy Kid   Yeah, I know what you said, but I'm guessing t...   May 7 2004, 05:11 PM
- - Arethusa   Wehn I said I'd use a combination, should...   May 7 2004, 05:18 PM
- - The White Dwarf   Honestly, if you want to rewrite the rules, youre ...   May 7 2004, 05:20 PM
- - Entropy Kid   My comment about your CQB rules wasn't about t...   May 7 2004, 05:25 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (The White Dwarf)Honestly, if you want to re...   May 7 2004, 05:54 PM
- - BitBasher   QUOTE That aside, if you're already differenti...   May 7 2004, 06:06 PM
- - Apathy   Using hit locations opens up another can of worms:...   May 7 2004, 06:31 PM
- - Bearclaw   GURPS has already done the work on this. The chan...   May 7 2004, 06:42 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (BitBasher)If you're going to use hit lo...   May 7 2004, 06:45 PM
- - Austere Emancipator   Then let's make one thing absolutely sure: Eve...   May 7 2004, 06:48 PM
- - Arethusa   Thing is, the TN modifier's not only +4. You ...   May 7 2004, 06:56 PM
- - Austere Emancipator   The other modifiers don't matter when you...   May 7 2004, 07:12 PM
- - Apathy   QUOTE "I shoot him in the eye!" ...   May 7 2004, 07:14 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Austere Emancipator)The other modifiers don...   May 7 2004, 07:26 PM
- - Person 404   QUOTE (Arethusa) Abstraction is also inversely pro...   May 7 2004, 08:02 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Person 404)Uh, no. Player: I shoot him. GM...   May 7 2004, 08:28 PM
- - The White Dwarf   Let me clarify then. Due to using a 6 sided die, ...   May 7 2004, 09:24 PM
- - ShadowGhost   Players and Gms are going to be spending about 5 m...   May 7 2004, 10:25 PM
- - Eyeless Blond   QUOTE (Arethusa) Basically, in sufficiently close ...   May 7 2004, 11:51 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (The White Dwarf)Let me clarify then. Due to...   May 8 2004, 12:14 AM
- - Eyeless Blond   QUOTE (Arethusa)Anyway, I don't think you unde...   May 8 2004, 01:41 AM
- - BitBasher   I really, really have to agree with Eyeless on the...   May 8 2004, 01:54 AM
- - Oddfellow   Are, As a disclaimer, if you are having fun tryin...   May 8 2004, 02:02 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Eyeless Blond)Neither of these suggestions ...   May 8 2004, 03:56 AM
- - Oddfellow   I wasn't suggesting that you would kill adepts...   May 8 2004, 05:18 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Oddfellow)I wasn't suggesting that you ...   May 8 2004, 05:56 AM
- - The White Dwarf   Yes, under your system you DO need different TN se...   May 8 2004, 06:53 AM
- - Entropy Kid   QUOTE [...]Combat Sorcery and Healing Sorcery with...   May 8 2004, 07:04 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (The White Dwarf)Youd have to come up with a...   May 8 2004, 07:24 AM
- - Oddfellow   I see what you are saying about TN4/Bypass armor h...   May 8 2004, 07:29 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Oddfellow)Calling SR's guns horribly in...   May 8 2004, 07:51 AM
- - Eyeless Blond   QUOTE (Arethusa)On the contrary, cover is the runn...   May 8 2004, 08:07 AM
- - Entropy Kid   QUOTE The problem with affecting combat pool and i...   May 8 2004, 08:08 AM
- - Oddfellow   You say you want reality, but then you complain th...   May 8 2004, 08:44 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Oddfellow)You say you want reality, but the...   May 8 2004, 10:45 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)As for tracking multiple combatant...   May 8 2004, 12:53 PM
- - The White Dwarf   Yea, I *DO* understand what Im suggesting. Which ...   May 8 2004, 02:09 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Eyeless Blond)Well, IMO if you're going...   May 8 2004, 05:50 PM
- - Entropy Kid   QUOTE Will it hurt mages? Hell yes. They deserve ...   May 8 2004, 06:35 PM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (Entropy Kid)Magic-type characters already h...   May 8 2004, 08:33 PM
- - The White Dwarf   Post all these revisions youre going to do or bala...   May 8 2004, 08:39 PM
- - Eyeless Blond   QUOTE (Arethusa) QUOTE (Eyeless Blond)Well, IMO if...   May 8 2004, 09:27 PM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)To clarify, I'm not talkinga b...   May 9 2004, 01:04 AM
- - Arethusa   QUOTE (The White Dwarf)Post all these revisions yo...   May 9 2004, 05:40 AM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Arethusa)Also, I was under the impression t...   May 9 2004, 07:56 AM
- - Arethusa   Heh. That certainly is ironic. Ah well. Should ...   May 9 2004, 08:11 AM
- - Diesel   Phaeton is wrong. Cannon Companion, page 27 has r...   May 9 2004, 09:02 AM
- - Arethusa   Damn, could've sworn there were rules, but tha...   May 9 2004, 04:44 PM
- - Diesel   I hear you, and have felt it once or twice thanks ...   May 9 2004, 06:29 PM
- - Austere Emancipator   QUOTE (Diesel)RPGs in AA Not a particularly good e...   May 9 2004, 06:34 PM
- - Diesel   I meant the backblast, which is significantly less...   May 9 2004, 10:20 PM
- - Phaeton   QUOTE (Diesel) Phaeton is wrong. Cannon Companion...   May 9 2004, 10:21 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st August 2025 - 04:42 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.