IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Focus Addiction, when exactly is a focus active?
Moon-Hawk
post May 18 2004, 01:12 PM
Post #1


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Is a spell focus or anchoring focus considered active when it's 'standing by' but not really doing anything? For example, Bob the mage has magic 5. He has a force 4 sustaining focus that has, say, Armor. He has a force 4 specific spell focus for Manabolt, and a force 4 anchoring focus for Treat. If he uses his force 4 spell focus for a Manabolt, then much later in the turn his anchoring focus goes off, was his total active foci used at 12, or was it at 8 twice? (sustaining and specific spell, then later sustaining and anchoring)
ref MitS pg 45-46
QUOTE

Each Combat Turn in which a magician uses a total Force in foci greater than twice his Magic Attribute,...

The word total makes me think that it is the former, but
QUOTE
...make a Magic Test against a target number equal to half the total Force of the active foci (round down).

here the use of active makes me think that it might be the latter. So when, precisely, is a focus active?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Moon-Hawk   Focus Addiction   May 18 2004, 01:12 PM
- - toturi   OK, from the strict wording of the rules, the trig...   May 18 2004, 01:20 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   Was my grammar really that bad? Yes, the trigger i...   May 18 2004, 01:25 PM
- - Ancient History   Moon-Hawk: according to your example, he had an an...   May 18 2004, 01:36 PM
- - OurTeam   Anchoring Focus: Once the spell(s) are linked to t...   May 18 2004, 02:28 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   Okay, cool. The anchoring focus was a bad example...   May 18 2004, 02:47 PM
- - Cain   My first instinct is to say no-- but then again, i...   May 18 2004, 04:29 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   Cain: The speeds involved aren't all that ridi...   May 18 2004, 04:46 PM
- - A Clockwork Lime   Dunno where you're really having the problem. ...   May 18 2004, 04:54 PM
- - Moon-Hawk   The problem is, you're making assumptions. No...   May 18 2004, 05:08 PM
- - A Clockwork Lime   Err, "total" doesn't imply simultane...   May 18 2004, 05:15 PM
- - Dashifen   I agree with ACL on this one. I've always run...   May 18 2004, 06:10 PM
- - Prospero   If you read the Focus Addiction example on MitS p....   May 18 2004, 06:12 PM
- - Ancient History   Here's the way I read the rules on this: If y...   May 18 2004, 06:19 PM
- - Cain   Prospero: I treat allies as separate from foci. T...   May 19 2004, 01:23 AM
- - A Clockwork Lime   Ally spirits aren't foci. They have an abilit...   May 19 2004, 01:25 AM
- - Glyph   I interpret "make a Magic Test against a targ...   May 19 2004, 03:26 AM
- - OurTeam   I run it the way Glyph describes. I think that is ...   May 19 2004, 06:19 AM
- - Joker9125   QUOTE (Glyph)Can I have some nachos with that chee...   May 19 2004, 08:57 AM
- - toturi   QUOTE (Moon-Hawk) Each Combat Turn in which a magi...   May 19 2004, 11:38 AM
- - toturi   QUOTE (Glyph @ May 19 2004, 11:26 AM) I inter...   May 19 2004, 11:40 AM
- - Prospero   @Cain: Karma-wise, they don't necessarily have...   May 20 2004, 12:53 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th July 2025 - 04:30 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.