 Navel Damage, How does it work? |
 Jul 19 2004, 02:12 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target  Group: Members Posts: 369 Joined: 1-September 03 From: New York State Member No.: 5,563  |
Well....
Thanos |
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
Thanos007 Navel Damage Jul 19 2004, 02:12 AM
Kagetenshi You roll a d100, and if you get a 100 you hit your... Jul 19 2004, 02:16 AM Domino Bigger, Badder, BOOM. it is above and beyond the s... Jul 19 2004, 03:09 AM littlesean You do mean Naval and not Navel, right? Jul 19 2004, 04:41 AM Domino Yes, Navel. So it would be BOD+2 M Stun. And the a... Jul 19 2004, 04:56 AM mfb naval damage works on the same progression as regu... Jul 19 2004, 01:35 PM GunnerJ Naval damage was made because of the Hull rating. ... Jul 19 2004, 02:25 PM toturi Think of Naval scale as vehicles' vehicle and ... Jul 19 2004, 02:39 PM Arethusa Well, light armor and up. Light vehicles still us... Jul 19 2004, 03:29 PM mfb actually, tanks do use normal damage tracks. the h... Jul 19 2004, 03:56 PM Austere Emancipator All land-bound vehicles use the normal damage trac... Jul 19 2004, 04:00 PM mfb hilariously, if you follow the rules to the letter... Jul 19 2004, 04:15 PM Austere Emancipator Personally, I see no reason whatsoever to disallow... Jul 19 2004, 04:29 PM shadd4d I wonder if that's supposed to be a misprint (... Jul 19 2004, 07:21 PM Kagetenshi QUOTE (Austere Emancipator) All land-bound vehicle... Jul 19 2004, 11:21 PM FlakJacket QUOTE (shadd4d)Correction, pg. 57 says that ordina... Jul 20 2004, 12:14 AM mfb that's pretty much exactly what it's sayin... Jul 20 2004, 12:16 AM shadd4d Yes. It's dumb. It's next to the example o... Jul 20 2004, 12:31 AM FlakJacket Oookay. Think that's something that probably n... Jul 20 2004, 12:32 AM shadd4d So to the errata should be added naval weapon clar... Jul 20 2004, 12:40 AM Arethusa No, even that's still a bit silly. Should be ... Jul 20 2004, 01:52 AM Austere Emancipator QUOTE (Kagetenshi) QUOTE (Austere Emancipator ... Jul 20 2004, 03:42 AM Necrotic Monkey The reason for that is due to the sheer size of th... Jul 20 2004, 03:45 AM Kagetenshi Exactly. As I've said elsewhere, think of it t... Jul 20 2004, 03:52 AM Austere Emancipator To be fair, IRL a MBT would probably have signific... Jul 20 2004, 04:02 AM hobgoblin i think the line is refering to targeting by senso... Jul 21 2004, 12:45 AM Kagetenshi The opposite would seem to make more sense…
~J Jul 21 2004, 12:56 AM Austere Emancipator Indeed. Jul 21 2004, 03:39 AM hobgoblin maybe so but this is sr we are talking about
the ... Jul 21 2004, 09:35 AM Cochise QUOTE (mfb)actually, tanks do use normal damage tr... Jul 21 2004, 09:52 AM shadd4d Cochise, is the chassis template for the tanks the... Jul 21 2004, 10:05 AM Cochise QUOTE (shadd4d)Cochise, is the chassis template fo... Jul 21 2004, 10:10 AM Nath Anti-ship Weapons != having naval damage. Wha... Jul 21 2004, 11:29 AM Arethusa That doesn't quite hold up. You can suppress ... Jul 21 2004, 01:16 PM Nath But that's still SR rules: you can't mount... Jul 21 2004, 01:30 PM
Austere Emancipator Nath: We agree that that could well be interpreted... Jul 21 2004, 02:17 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st August 2025 - 03:34 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.