IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Rules for Sustaining Spells, Is LOS necessary?
SugarDog
post Sep 3 2003, 10:10 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 3-September 03
Member No.: 5,575



Hi all. Some friends and I have recently taken up Shadowrun, and this question came up in play. Does a magician need to maintain LOS in order to sustain a spell on a target? We couldn't find a direct answer to this in the book (we only have the main SR3 book). However, I did find that in the critters section, it specifically mentions that critters do *not* need to maintain LOS to sustain a spell, therefore implying that normal magicians do. Therefore, we came up with an on-the-spot house rule that, if LOS were lost, sustained spells would remain in effect for (force) turns, and if the magician were still sustaining the spell when LOS was restored (and (force) turns had not yet elapsed), it would be as if LOS were never lost.
Is there any official word on this? Does this house rule seem reasonable to your SR veterans?
Thanks mucho
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th June 2026 - 05:11 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.