IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Auras, invisibility, foci, and kittens
katiegreen
post Sep 7 2003, 08:52 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 10-August 03
Member No.: 5,404



The question of how far an aura extends brings up an interesting point. If I cast improved invisibility on myself, what exactly does it make invisible? I'd say that it's pretty standard to make me and my clothes, armor, etc. invisable. The idea I'd heard explaining this is because it is within your aura, though there isn't any cannon I can find backing this up. Well, what about a hiking backpack? That's pretty big. Or an assault rifle? Or a deck? Is that still in your aura? How about in your invisibility? What if I put my invisibility spell into a sustaining focus? Then the focus is magically active, with it's own astral presence . . . most people would argue that it isn't in my aura any more, but would it be invisible? What if I'm holding a kitten? Is the kitten invisible, or do I have to cast it on the kitten as well? What if the kitten is under a jacket? Or in the hiking backpack? Hiding behind something that is invisible doesn't make you invisible, so would this result in a kitten appearing to float through mid-air? If a guard sees said kitten, would he get a reduced target number/a second chance to see the runner holding the cat?

EDIT: If you pick up the kitten after you cast the spell, would that be different than if you're holding the kitten at the time of casting?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- katiegreen   Auras, invisibility, foci, and kittens   Sep 7 2003, 08:52 PM
- - Glyph   In my opinion: Invisibility makes one target invi...   Sep 7 2003, 10:55 PM
- - Kagetenshi   But then the Schröedinger's cat problem, what ...   Sep 7 2003, 11:00 PM
- - Glyph   A cat is not a subject, because cats have no king.   Sep 7 2003, 11:13 PM
- - katiegreen   QUOTE I would rule that anything you are wearing, ...   Sep 8 2003, 12:56 AM
- - Zazen   QUOTE (Kagetenshi) But then the Schröedinger's...   Sep 8 2003, 01:32 AM
- - Sunday_Gamer   I have always worked it in this fashion. You cast...   Sep 8 2003, 02:11 AM
- - John Campbell   Does it make a difference if it's a blackberry...   Sep 8 2003, 02:34 AM
- - TinkerGnome   Only to the troll, and only if he gets really hung...   Sep 8 2003, 03:17 AM
- - Glyph   QUOTE QUOTE I would rule that anything you are we...   Sep 8 2003, 03:44 AM
- - Kagetenshi   QUOTE (Zazen) What on earth does that have to do w...   Sep 8 2003, 04:46 AM
- - Sunday_Gamer   What if the cat is a cyberzombie? I mean slap in...   Sep 8 2003, 06:17 PM
- - Herald of Verjigorm   If you've read the powers of a blackberry cat,...   Sep 8 2003, 06:20 PM
- - Talia Invierno   Or Cheshire cats - invisible on their own but for ...   Sep 8 2003, 06:33 PM
- - BitBasher   Don't forget Talis Cats too... the urban preda...   Sep 8 2003, 07:34 PM
- - AK404   I'm sorry, my brain's still fizzing out ov...   Sep 8 2003, 11:50 PM
- - Zazen   QUOTE (Kagetenshi) The entire basis for saying tha...   Sep 9 2003, 03:40 AM
- - Kagetenshi   The question being whether the kitten counts as a ...   Sep 9 2003, 04:57 AM
- - Zazen   But that's just a yes or no answer on the part...   Sep 9 2003, 12:38 PM
- - Herald of Verjigorm   The paradox must be established in order to get th...   Sep 9 2003, 07:01 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd August 2025 - 04:51 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.