 improved invisibility, question |
 Jan 31 2005, 01:41 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target  Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 29-January 05 Member No.: 7,033  |
hey guys ,fortune wrote questions into shadoqfax ,one of the questions was about improved invisibility and turning objects invisible.and did the force have anything to do with fooling cameras ect....
the answer was basically this only time the force is important is when your trying to turn an object invisible ie...like a camera you have to beat the o/r of it by the force to actually turn the camera invisible. thats all good we dont run around turning cameras and stop signs invisible even though that could be usefull.my question is this [do you have to beat the o/r of the items your carrying to turn them invisible? i mean lets think ....your carrying a gun,credstick,armored clothing,sunglasses ect...do you have to beat those o/r to turn invisible ? i hope you all understand what im trying to ask....it would put a limit on the improved invisibility spell that everymage runs around with at force 1. |
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
gamemaster improved invisibility Jan 31 2005, 01:41 AM
Lycan If you want an official position just go the FAQ i... Jan 31 2005, 01:53 AM Tarantula Lycan you misuderstood.
ShadowFAQ answered statin... Jan 31 2005, 02:47 AM gamemaster i understand what it says on shadowfaq ,blaa blaa ... Jan 31 2005, 02:47 AM gamemaster so tarantula ,whats your answer you do need to bea... Jan 31 2005, 02:49 AM BitBasher QUOTE (gamemaster) so tarantula ,whats your answer... Jan 31 2005, 03:27 AM Fortune I would say no, the spell's Force does not hav... Jan 31 2005, 06:44 AM Eyeless Blond QUOTE (Fortune) I would say no, the spell's Fo... Jan 31 2005, 08:23 AM toturi Is your intent to destroy the computer? If yes, th... Jan 31 2005, 09:20 AM OurTeam My character's intent is to go back in time an... Jan 31 2005, 10:59 AM toturi Canon says you can't. Jan 31 2005, 11:00 AM Tarantula QUOTE (toturi) Is your intent to destroy the compu... Jan 31 2005, 02:08 PM CanvasBack Why would you want to destroy the Computer? The C... Jan 31 2005, 04:37 PM BitBasher But in [game] reality magic does not work on inten... Jan 31 2005, 05:04 PM Gilthanis Oh no. He said in Reality. Jan 31 2005, 05:16 PM Tarantula Reality meaning a bunch of guys following rules fo... Jan 31 2005, 05:18 PM Cochise Some thoughts here again (previously stated in sim... Jan 31 2005, 05:43 PM BitBasher QUOTE (Tarantula) Reality meaning a bunch of guys ... Jan 31 2005, 05:51 PM GrinderTheTroll QUOTE (gamemaster) .my question is this [do you ha... Jan 31 2005, 07:28 PM Cochise QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll) BTW, Invis 1 isn't eve... Jan 31 2005, 07:30 PM Gilthanis QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll) QUOTE (gamemaster @ J... Jan 31 2005, 07:31 PM GrinderTheTroll Damn, sorry, I read my SR2 book the other night a ... Jan 31 2005, 07:40 PM Cochise QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll)Right. You can't ... Jan 31 2005, 08:06 PM GrinderTheTroll In my group we frown at Spells with force <3, s... Jan 31 2005, 08:17 PM Tarantula So Grinder, by your logic to affect a doberman dro... Jan 31 2005, 09:39 PM James McMurray If I'm reading his quote right, his logic says... Jan 31 2005, 09:42 PM Shaudes29 you forget to add in the drones body and 1/2 its a... Jan 31 2005, 09:51 PM James McMurray That's for generating the target number. The n... Jan 31 2005, 09:57 PM GrinderTheTroll QUOTE (Tarantula @ Jan 31 2005, 02:39 PM) So ... Jan 31 2005, 10:14 PM James McMurray A drone's object rating is always 8 (or at lea... Jan 31 2005, 10:19 PM GrinderTheTroll QUOTE (Shaudes29) you forget to add in the drones ... Jan 31 2005, 10:20 PM GrinderTheTroll Got it. SR3.150.
So OR + Body + 1/2 armor is the ... Jan 31 2005, 10:26 PM Kanada Ten To use Invisibility on a Vehicle one needs to make... Feb 1 2005, 12:23 AM ShadowGhost You're still casting the spell *around* the ob... Feb 1 2005, 01:28 AM Crimson Jack QUOTE (ShadowGhost) We house rule that all illusio... Feb 1 2005, 01:33 AM John Campbell QUOTE (Kanada Ten) To use Invisibility on a Vehicl... Feb 1 2005, 01:43 AM Kanada Ten Mum, still shows that Indirect Illusions can be ca... Feb 1 2005, 01:45 AM gamemaster okay guys ,i understand what your all saying and i... Feb 1 2005, 04:22 AM Kanada Ten I've always said the same thing about it:
... Feb 1 2005, 04:29 AM BitBasher Yeah. and I disgaree it works that way, if the spe... Feb 1 2005, 04:33 AM Kanada Ten I like the idea that intent is inherent in magic. ... Feb 1 2005, 04:47 AM Cochise QUOTE (Kanada Ten) QUOTE Usually whenever this dis... Feb 1 2005, 09:33 AM Moon-Hawk I agree with Kanada Ten.
We're very used to sp... Feb 1 2005, 01:51 PM Tarantula MH. Yes, target still resists, however casting sp... Feb 1 2005, 02:07 PM Moon-Hawk But the spell isn't affecting the subject in a... Feb 1 2005, 02:35 PM Tarantula Subject is what the spell is cast on. In order fo... Feb 1 2005, 02:37 PM Kanada Ten No where in the rules about OR does it talk about ... Feb 1 2005, 02:42 PM Moon-Hawk QUOTE (Tarantula) Subject is what the spell is cas... Feb 1 2005, 02:45 PM Tarantula Alright, so to tie this into the doberman thread..... Feb 1 2005, 02:56 PM Moon-Hawk QUOTE (Tarantula) Alright, so to tie this into the... Feb 1 2005, 02:59 PM Tarantula Not really many... ultrasound, proximity detectors... Feb 1 2005, 03:06 PM Kanada Ten Strictly by the rules, you can't make your dob... Feb 1 2005, 03:28 PM Tarantula I didn't say the drone was the only problem ka... Feb 1 2005, 03:30 PM Kanada Ten The rules specifically state subject person or are... Feb 1 2005, 03:34 PM Tarantula So if its specifically person, why does anything o... Feb 1 2005, 03:42 PM Moon-Hawk Tarantula, I think of it as either being cast over... Feb 1 2005, 03:46 PM Cochise QUOTE (Tarantula)So if its specifically person, wh... Feb 1 2005, 03:58 PM Tarantula So what if my intent is to strap a dwarf on a dobe... Feb 1 2005, 04:14 PM Shaudes29 well if you wanted an invisibility spell that was ... Feb 1 2005, 04:20 PM Cochise QUOTE (Tarantula)So what if my intent is to strap ... Feb 1 2005, 04:22 PM Tarantula The earth has its own aura, and thus isn't the... Feb 1 2005, 04:51 PM Moon-Hawk Tarantula: I submit that it is because the clothe... Feb 1 2005, 05:08 PM James McMurray QUOTE (Tarantula) Shaudes, I'm using the princ... Feb 1 2005, 05:08 PM Moon-Hawk Yes, yes, yes, obviously game balance. But we wan... Feb 1 2005, 05:10 PM Tarantula Why isn't the doberman in a dwarfs aura? What... Feb 1 2005, 05:14 PM Moon-Hawk As a GM, I would have to seriously consider lettin... Feb 1 2005, 05:15 PM James McMurray There isn't one. And I don't think there c... Feb 1 2005, 05:15 PM Cochise QUOTE (Tarantula)The earth has its own aura, and t... Feb 1 2005, 05:20 PM Tarantula I'm going off what you guys say, because thing... Feb 1 2005, 05:20 PM James McMurray Tarantula: I can almost gaurantee you that you... Feb 1 2005, 05:23 PM Tarantula Hey, I'm taking what you guys say, and applyin... Feb 1 2005, 05:28 PM Cochise QUOTE (Tarantula)Hey, I'm taking what you guys... Feb 1 2005, 05:33 PM GrinderTheTroll QUOTE (ShadowGhost) You're still casting the s... Feb 1 2005, 05:49 PM Shaudes29 QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll)
Your not casting it aroun... Feb 1 2005, 06:44 PM GrinderTheTroll QUOTE (Shaudes29)So even if the sensors are a rati... Feb 1 2005, 07:04 PM DocMortand I hate to bump an old thread, but rather than star... Apr 4 2005, 03:53 AM Eyeless Blond Well, it would either be one of those or something... Apr 4 2005, 04:03 AM JaronK Disclaimer: What I am about to say is entirely my... Apr 4 2005, 05:20 AM DocMortand QUOTE (JaronK @ Apr 4 2005, 12:20 AM) In my g... Apr 4 2005, 05:43 AM Astelaron Is invisibility to powerful?
Low force improved i... Apr 4 2005, 09:17 PM hahnsoo QUOTE (Astelaron) Under Indirect Illusion Spells p... Apr 4 2005, 09:29 PM Astelaron I suppose this is debatable for some but for me th... Apr 4 2005, 11:26 PM John Campbell QUOTE (DocMortand) Question: A Sammy has Improved... Apr 5 2005, 12:04 AM Fester No spell has been the subject of more confusion; t... Apr 5 2005, 01:49 AM DocMortand Thanks for the input guys - the varying perspectiv... Apr 5 2005, 05:30 AM hahnsoo QUOTE (Astelaron) implies that all indirect illusi... Apr 5 2005, 05:41 AM Astelaron QUOTE (hahnsoo) They aren't. (Improved) Invis... Apr 5 2005, 11:01 PM JaronK QUOTE (DocMortand) Is an interesting take on thing... Apr 5 2005, 10:06 PM
hahnsoo I've always played it that Invisibility encomp... Apr 5 2005, 10:30 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th April 2026 - 02:17 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.