 SR4: Good Idea or Not?, Took long enough... |
 Mar 16 2005, 04:50 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Runner  Group: Members Posts: 2,751 Joined: 8-August 03 From: Neighbor of the Beast Member No.: 5,375  |
We've seen this poll before but now its real. Have at it.
|
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
kevyn668 SR4: Good Idea or Not? Mar 16 2005, 04:50 AM
kevyn668 I came down on the side of "Good Idea." Mar 16 2005, 04:59 AM ThatPaolo The number of people and posts today is a pretty c... Mar 16 2005, 05:41 AM Kagetenshi I can't properly answer this poll. SR4 is a go... Mar 16 2005, 05:54 AM Paul Although somebody should have combined all of this... Mar 16 2005, 06:11 AM Capt. Dave QUOTE (Kagetenshi) I think you'd see twice the... Mar 16 2005, 06:12 AM mattness pl Good idea was second edition. Period.
Null vote Mar 16 2005, 12:04 PM Grinder SR4 is a good idea - but only if the rules are rea... Mar 16 2005, 01:18 PM Smed Too early to tell. SR4 could be great, could damag... Mar 16 2005, 01:30 PM Bigity I abstained. Until we know the specifics of the c... Mar 16 2005, 03:47 PM nezumi I'm with the captain.
I feel like my wife has... Mar 16 2005, 04:14 PM mintcar RE: SR4: Good Idea or Not? Mar 16 2005, 04:13 PM TheQuestionMan Definitely a good idea and not before it's tim... Mar 16 2005, 04:33 PM Jrayjoker QUOTE (nezumi) Will I like her? I don't know.... Mar 16 2005, 05:30 PM Jrayjoker Good Idea. It can only bring in new players (as lo... Mar 16 2005, 05:32 PM GrinderTheTroll I'm on the fence on this one.
If it's don... Mar 16 2005, 05:39 PM psykotisk_overlegen I don't like it. I don't see a problem wit... Mar 16 2005, 07:17 PM Lindt I for one am going to sit, and wait for the finish... Mar 16 2005, 09:34 PM moosegod I want a mildly revised SR3, not a whole new syste... Mar 16 2005, 09:47 PM Cynic project Well, here is my biggest problem with the SR4, it ... Mar 16 2005, 10:08 PM mfb i think that's why they're releasing the c... Mar 16 2005, 11:21 PM SirBedevere SR4 good or not? I too will wait and see.
SR3 al... Mar 16 2005, 11:37 PM Wounded Ronin I still don't think that we needed any edition... Mar 17 2005, 02:13 AM Fortune I definitely think SR3 was an improvement over SR2... Mar 17 2005, 02:35 AM SpasticTeapot I would say yes.
I'm a Shadowrun fan, but the... Mar 17 2005, 03:37 AM Dark Scrier I'm all for a rules revision, and new characte... Mar 17 2005, 05:24 AM Penta I am a firm believer that unless I can see where t... Mar 17 2005, 05:25 AM BishopMcQ I'm cautiously optomistic, there have been eno... Mar 17 2005, 05:39 AM Glyph I voted no, because it looks like they're alre... Mar 17 2005, 06:24 AM Babel I have to go with no, if only because I don't ... Mar 17 2005, 06:48 AM
L.D If it holds up to promise, then it's a good id... Mar 17 2005, 07:28 AM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 03:26 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.