Apr 19 2005, 10:04 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 179 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 381 |
I'll try to post this now. It's rather long and as I've been writing it on and off for some weeks since this discussion.
EDIT: If you are new to this thread, the long discussion on "belief/understanding" can safely be skipped. I post it with the intention that some of the people working on SR4 will pick up some or most of these ideas, and to get feedback. If I come of arrogant or something it's probably because I am ;)If SR4 continues in the same vein as MitS, this might be something for the SR3R. Here goes: My intent is to make the SR magic rules more consistent and flexible. SR magic rules are quite good, better than many others. The initial system was a good idea and lots of good ideas have been added over time. Now, it's a heap of good ideas. The problem is that most ideas simply have been added on top of the others and the basic system, there's no consistency to it. SR4 intends to fix this for the rest of the system, so why not for magic too. I have some suggestions. The basics are: 1. Magic works the way you believe it works. This is no longer only fluff (as it is by current rules), but the way the rules work. Culturally different traditions such as Quabbalah, Norse magic or Bantu animism shouldn't be tweaks of hermetic or shamanic magic, but traditions all by themselves. The spirits conjured and the magic worked should reflect this. 2. Same rules for all. SR3 mostly has same rules for everyone. Though, SR3 defies 1. By adding more flexibility to the basic rules it should be possible do both 1 and 2. 3. Move SR magic from the realm of D&D fantasy spellslingers into the realm of Urban fantasy (Neil Gaiman, etc) magicians. Why? Well, SR was originally the combination of D&D and cyberpunk. Since it first appeared, cyberpunk fiction is no longer or has evolved into so much more. SR4 seems to try to catch up with some of these changes. Why shouldn't it catch up with the evolution in fantasy as well. SR has adopted lots of concepts from RL occultism and mysticism, something which moves it much closer to urban fantasy, so why not take it the whole way. What I want is magic rules which treats magic as magic is portrayed in fiction. Lots of rituals, mysticism, spirits and dangerous powers. This should be a part of the system, not fluff. 4. More options. Going from 1,2 and 3 the system needs more options. And it needs more ways of introducing new stuff. MitS was written in a way that permitted no new stuff to be added. There was two options for introducing new stuff in SR3 magic. One was to introduce new metamagics (T:AL, SOTA2063), the other was to tweak and bend the existing rules (Euromagic in SOTA2064). I felt crippled when working on the Neo-Pagan rules in the Euromagic chapter. I had to take into account what MitS said about something even if it was far off. I especially loathe the idea of Idols. MitS it was a ”cover everything”-book instead of the ”advanced magic rules” book. Hopefully Street Magic would be the latter. 5. No power creep. More options shouldn't be more powerful, only more flavor and fun. This hasn't really been a problem in SR so far IMHO, though it should still be avoided. Take note that all my suggestions are only ideas and suggestions. Game balance or any other balance is not calculated with in any way. I'm no good at writing actual rules, I'm good at ideas and concepts. This post has been edited by audun: May 4 2005, 01:16 PM |
|
|
|
audun audun's ideas for an overhaul of SR magic Apr 19 2005, 10:04 PM
audun BUILD POINT MAGIC
This is a somewhat cumbersome wa... Apr 19 2005, 10:09 PM
audun RITUAL MAGIC
The ritual magic rules could use a re... Apr 19 2005, 10:10 PM
audun TRADITION, WAYS AND TOTEMS
All Awakened are part ... Apr 19 2005, 10:12 PM
audun CONJURING AND SPIRITS
Your Tradition dictates what... Apr 19 2005, 10:16 PM
audun REARRANGING SPELL CATEGORIES
Included mostly for c... Apr 19 2005, 10:16 PM
Ellery Maybe I'll get into the details later, but the... Apr 19 2005, 10:45 PM
audun In other words belief is the wrong word, or at lea... Apr 19 2005, 11:04 PM
Ellery My first points still apply--can't a magician ... Apr 20 2005, 01:19 AM
Edward I think you put to much emphasis on a few skills.
... Apr 20 2005, 05:03 AM
blakkie QUOTE (Ellery @ Apr 19 2005, 07:19 PM) My fir... Apr 20 2005, 06:02 AM
Critias QUOTE They are not nessasarily equally potent eith... Apr 20 2005, 06:48 AM
blakkie QUOTE (Critias @ Apr 20 2005, 12:48 AM) QUOTE... Apr 20 2005, 06:55 AM
Critias So one the one hand you want to preach options and... Apr 20 2005, 07:04 AM
Lilt Sounds great, but note that no-matter how open you... Apr 20 2005, 07:20 AM
blakkie Critias
You are yelping up the wrong tree, and fr... Apr 20 2005, 07:21 AM
audun Obviously, things aren't expressed as clearly ... Apr 21 2005, 11:10 AM
audun QUOTE (blakkie)Perhaps better wording would be:
... Apr 21 2005, 11:11 AM
audun QUOTE (Lilt)Sounds great, but note that no-matter ... Apr 21 2005, 11:23 AM
audun Critias:
QUOTE (Critias) QUOTE (blakkie)They a... Apr 21 2005, 11:28 AM
Edward Yes your right I got confused on a few points.
Me... Apr 21 2005, 12:07 PM
Edward ops Apr 21 2005, 12:10 PM
Ellery Whether you call it belief or understanding or wha... Apr 21 2005, 12:27 PM
Demosthenes QUOTE (Ellery) Why can't my understanding be t... Apr 21 2005, 12:47 PM
Demosthenes Edit: Double post. Apr 21 2005, 12:47 PM
golden1 QUOTE (Ellery) Whether you call it belief or under... Apr 21 2005, 02:05 PM
golden1 double post deleted due to what looked like a Mysq... Apr 21 2005, 02:05 PM
Edward The difficulty with saying that whatever you belie... Apr 21 2005, 04:01 PM
Crimsondude 2.0 QUOTE (Demosthenes) QUOTE (Ellery @ Apr 21 20... Apr 21 2005, 07:30 PM
golden1 ok. lets see if i can put this in a way that ever... Apr 22 2005, 12:06 AM
Ellery If it is the case that magic requires belief, but ... Apr 22 2005, 06:57 AM
Demosthenes QUOTE (Ellery @ Apr 22 2005, 06:57 AM) If it ... Apr 22 2005, 07:35 AM
Crimsondude 2.0 Well, IC they can be as self-contradictory and ... Apr 22 2005, 03:36 PM
mfb QUOTE (Ellery)If it is the case that magic require... Apr 22 2005, 03:55 PM
audun To understand magic there has to be something ther... Apr 22 2005, 04:57 PM
Ellery If your understanding has to be correct, in some s... Apr 22 2005, 06:02 PM
audun QUOTE (Ellery)If your understanding has to be corr... Apr 22 2005, 08:50 PM
audun QUOTE (mfb)another salient question is, what happe... Apr 22 2005, 08:52 PM
Crimsondude 2.0 What happens when your Totem stops believing in yo... Apr 22 2005, 11:18 PM
golden1 QUOTE (Crimsondude 2.0) What happens when your Tot... Apr 22 2005, 11:46 PM
Crimsondude 2.0 So long as SR3, p. 182 has not been omitted or ove... Apr 23 2005, 12:19 AM
Botch Audun, good work.
I would adore a magic system wh... Apr 23 2005, 11:29 AM
Critias Wow. That's a some ridiculous shit. Apr 23 2005, 11:34 AM
Botch True story though.
I believe that I am a great dr... Apr 23 2005, 11:35 AM
Edward Botch just gave a key phrase I like.
“beliefs of ... Apr 23 2005, 12:53 PM
Critias Doesn't matter if it's "true" or... Apr 23 2005, 01:06 PM
Botch QUOTE (Edward) The question is this.
If I take a ... Apr 23 2005, 01:11 PM
Edward As far as I know there is absolutely no physical e... Apr 23 2005, 01:31 PM
Botch QUOTE (Critias @ Apr 23 2005, 02:06 PM) Doesn... Apr 23 2005, 01:41 PM
Botch QUOTE (Edward) I can see the advertisements now. M... Apr 23 2005, 01:43 PM
Edward QUOTE (Botch) QUOTE (Edward @ Apr 23 2005, 02... Apr 23 2005, 01:54 PM
Botch Although mana-channelling (aka magic) does to some... Apr 23 2005, 02:05 PM
Ellery Okay, now maybe we're getting somewhere.
If m... Apr 23 2005, 05:48 PM
Critias I'm sorry. You're right. Some loser gett... Apr 23 2005, 06:39 PM
audun QUOTE (Ellery)Okay, now maybe we're getting so... Apr 23 2005, 08:45 PM
Ellery QUOTE What about:
- Spirits that fits better with ... Apr 23 2005, 09:25 PM
Crimsondude 2.0 QUOTE (Botch @ Apr 23 2005, 06:41 AM) You mis... Apr 23 2005, 10:11 PM
golden1 ya know, the way this argumentis going, imayhave t... Apr 24 2005, 12:38 AM
Ellery I don't think technology or magic has reached ... Apr 24 2005, 12:45 AM
mfb re: divining, and its rarity.
divining should wor... Apr 24 2005, 03:37 AM
Ellery That idea had occurred to me, but it makes divinat... Apr 24 2005, 05:52 AM
audun QUOTE (Ellery)Mythic spirits just open up another ... Apr 24 2005, 02:28 PM
DrJest Vis-a-vis the existence (or otherwise) of totems/g... Apr 24 2005, 03:55 PM
Ellery If that isn't Terry Pratchett, it sure sounds ... Apr 24 2005, 04:53 PM
Edward There is really verily little room to mauver withi... Apr 24 2005, 05:04 PM
audun QUOTE (myself)Initiation and Metamagics
Any magic ... Apr 24 2005, 05:09 PM
DrJest QUOTE (Ellery) If that isn't Terry Pratchett, ... Apr 24 2005, 05:17 PM
Crimsondude 2.0 damn, too late.
Sounds like Pratchett or Gaiman, ... Apr 24 2005, 05:31 PM
Ellery QUOTE The reason I used it as a basic ability was ... Apr 24 2005, 05:48 PM
DrJest QUOTE (Crimsondude 2.0) damn, too late.
Sounds li... Apr 24 2005, 07:40 PM
Ellery Small Gods by Pratchett is hilarious and well-done... Apr 24 2005, 07:55 PM
audun QUOTE (Edward)There is really verily little room t... Apr 24 2005, 08:48 PM
Crimsondude 2.0 QUOTE (DrJest) QUOTE (Crimsondude 2.0 @ Apr 2... Apr 24 2005, 08:59 PM
golden1 there are three or four ways of doing this
the all... Apr 24 2005, 09:11 PM
Ellery I interpreted centering as a linking between the p... Apr 25 2005, 02:03 AM
Edward QUOTE (audun)
QUOTE
If you want to be able to cr... Apr 25 2005, 02:58 AM
audun QUOTE (Edward)You say no rules to do this. I think... Apr 26 2005, 06:48 PM
audun QUOTE (Ellery)Of course, this is a rationalization... Apr 26 2005, 08:48 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th December 2025 - 08:19 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.