 Nanoware, do you want more of it in SR4? |
 Apr 22 2005, 09:23 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Great, I'm a Dragon...  Group: Retired Admins Posts: 6,699 Joined: 8-October 03 From: North Germany Member No.: 5,698  |
Well, as we all know, nanoware/nanotech was introduced in m&m, but was/is expensive and hardly available. And the stuff is mostly crap, lacking useful functions for joe average runner. So should it become more common 2070?
Cool, my first poll :D |
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
Grinder Nanoware Apr 22 2005, 09:23 AM
Demosthenes Yes.
Small things doing cool stuff are cool.
Like ... Apr 22 2005, 11:00 AM Grinder Recently watched "beavis and butthead"? ... Apr 22 2005, 11:02 AM Sunshine Jes there should be more Nanoware!
I 'd o... Apr 22 2005, 12:22 PM Nikoli I think a Grey Goo threat would make for an intere... Apr 22 2005, 12:41 PM Lantzer I didn't care for CP CyberGeneration (I think ... Apr 22 2005, 02:48 PM mmu1 Nanoware is the tool of the devil.
Seriously, tho... Apr 22 2005, 02:58 PM BitBasher I voted no because 99% of the time nanotech is a c... Apr 22 2005, 03:11 PM Critias I don't mind nanoware that makes sense when it... Apr 22 2005, 03:12 PM Garland No. Widespread nano starts getting beyond the lev... Apr 22 2005, 03:17 PM nezumi I'd be okay with it, but it'd have to be v... Apr 22 2005, 03:28 PM Nikoli Never even laid hands on the cybergeneration stuff... Apr 22 2005, 03:29 PM Arethusa QUOTE (mmu1) Nanoware is the tool of the devil.
S... Apr 22 2005, 03:40 PM Moon-Hawk I'll second Arethusa. Nanotech is cool, but i... Apr 22 2005, 04:13 PM Edward Remember that a nanite cant do anything significan... Apr 22 2005, 04:31 PM mmu1 QUOTE (Edward @ Apr 22 2005, 11:31 AM) Rememb... Apr 22 2005, 04:57 PM Moon-Hawk Remember, the nanite does not have to carry a long... Apr 22 2005, 04:59 PM Nikoli Seriously, read Prey. One of the best Sci-fi hand... Apr 22 2005, 05:02 PM Moon-Hawk I know, I know, it's on my list. Apr 22 2005, 05:03 PM GrinderTheTroll It's one of those neat ideas that didn't r... Apr 22 2005, 05:16 PM hahnsoo Another note: Long before the publication of Man a... Apr 22 2005, 08:22 PM Nikoli I had forgotten about tat cyberware was built thro... Apr 22 2005, 09:09 PM hahnsoo QUOTE (Nikoli) I had forgotten about tat cyberware... Apr 22 2005, 11:05 PM Fortune QUOTE (hahnsoo) Only the neural interface part is ... Apr 22 2005, 11:33 PM hahnsoo QUOTE (Fortune) QUOTE (hahnsoo @ Apr 23 2005,... Apr 22 2005, 11:41 PM Kagetenshi I voted yes, but I'd like to qualify that.
I... Apr 23 2005, 12:58 AM lacemaker I don't think consumer level nanotechnology ne... May 4 2005, 08:35 AM Rev Eh, I read a paper by a physicist once on nanotech... May 4 2005, 04:47 PM Edward I am curious what the low entropy would do to the ... May 4 2005, 07:28 PM mfb that's only true if you're trying to produ... May 4 2005, 10:27 PM The Other DSE Actually, even if you had all of those vats going ... May 10 2005, 04:42 PM Kagetenshi Nano-created wood might have the strength of wood,... May 10 2005, 05:00 PM Edward Nano wood is just stilly, nano build machine parts... May 10 2005, 07:14 PM mfb DSE, my point was that the corps wouldn't need... May 11 2005, 03:40 AM Edward For a moment mentally compare the cost of making w... May 11 2005, 07:04 AM Rev QUOTE (mfb) ...all they'd have to do would be ... May 11 2005, 04:58 PM The Other DSE Actually my point was that it would take a while *... May 11 2005, 06:48 PM Ellery Trees already nanoassemble wood, given some solid ... May 11 2005, 08:59 PM mfb what ellery said. why should nanoassembly be any m... May 12 2005, 12:25 AM Cray74 QUOTE (Grinder) Well, as we all know, nanoware/nan... May 12 2005, 12:57 AM Ellery Why use generic goop when you can reprogram trees ... May 12 2005, 02:33 AM Rev QUOTE (Ellery @ May 11 2005, 08:59 PM) Trees ... May 12 2005, 05:14 PM blakkie The energy vs. speed tradeoff assumes not changing... May 12 2005, 05:27 PM
Geko I voted no.
Instead of more Nanotech/Nanoware, ... May 12 2005, 07:51 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th August 2025 - 04:00 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.