IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Drones over America
Draco18s
post Mar 12 2012, 11:57 PM
Post #1


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,958
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



Interview on this week's Fresh Air.

http://www.npr.org/2012/03/12/148293470/dr...at-can-they-see

We're going to start seeing public (i.e. governmental) drones in April, and civilian (i.e. corporate) drones in 2015.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 13 2012, 12:01 AM
Post #2


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 13,808
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Cheaper and greener than helicopters. And the cops don't cry as much when you shoot one down, as you haven't killed anyone. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daylen
post Mar 13 2012, 12:06 AM
Post #3


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,420
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



Most things listed in that article will not be using the drone they showed in the picture. Also, drones are already being used as they describe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Mar 13 2012, 12:49 AM
Post #4


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,958
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Daylen @ Mar 12 2012, 07:06 PM) *
Most things listed in that article will not be using the drone they showed in the picture. Also, drones are already being used as they describe.


But only in a limited capacity, as there are no FAA regulations regarding unmanned aircraft.
As for the picture, I think that's a case of someone going "NED PICTUR OF DRONE."


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 13 2012, 01:46 AM
Post #5


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 13,808
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Yeah, last thing we need is a News Chopper being brought down because a drone wasn't transmitting an IFF signal. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Angelone
post Mar 13 2012, 02:10 AM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,170
Joined: 24-May 05
From: A 10x10 room with an orc and a treasure chest
Member No.: 7,409



So that's how St. Nick does it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Shooting down the drone might not kill anyone, but the flaming bits to the head might.


--------------------
REJOICE! For bad things are about to happen.
Elder #7 of the Drop Bear Conspiracy.
la vida no vale nada
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daylen
post Mar 13 2012, 08:00 PM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,420
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Mar 13 2012, 12:49 AM) *
But only in a limited capacity, as there are no FAA regulations regarding unmanned aircraft.
As for the picture, I think that's a case of someone going "NED PICTUR OF DRONE."

Um, without regulations that means in any capacity people can think of... Having restrictions upon behavior does not increase the capacity of use.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Mar 13 2012, 08:53 PM
Post #8


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,958
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Daylen @ Mar 13 2012, 03:00 PM) *
Um, without regulations that means in any capacity people can think of... Having restrictions upon behavior does not increase the capacity of use.


Current regulations are "none" as you may not fly any aircraft below a certain altitude.

Toy planes being an exception:

QUOTE
Recreational use of the National Airspace System is covered by FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 91-57 which generally limits operations to below 400 feet above ground level and away from airports and air traffic.


General height restrictions:

QUOTE
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:

(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.

(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.

© Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.

(d) Helicopters, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. If the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface—

(1) A helicopter may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or © of this section, provided each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA; and

(2) A powered parachute or weight-shift-control aircraft may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph © of this section.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 13 2012, 11:13 PM
Post #9


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 13,808
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Where does that put Iron Man?

Or Dragons?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JanessaVR
post Mar 13 2012, 11:37 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 231
Joined: 30-January 07
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 10,844



QUOTE (CanRay @ Mar 13 2012, 03:13 PM) *
Where does that put Iron Man?

Or Dragons?

Iron Man's rich enough to buy himself out of trouble. Dragons just don't care about puny mortal laws.


--------------------
Madness takes its toll - please have exact change.
On the keyboard of life, always keep one finger on the escape key.
Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 14 2012, 07:16 AM
Post #11


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 13,808
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (JanessaVR @ Mar 13 2012, 06:37 PM) *
Iron Man's rich enough to buy himself out of trouble. Dragons just don't care about puny mortal laws.
And Dragons are also usually rich enough to buy themselves out of any trouble they get into as well.

"Innocent until proven broke."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daylen
post Mar 15 2012, 12:05 AM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,420
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



QUOTE (CanRay @ Mar 14 2012, 08:16 AM) *
And Dragons are also usually rich enough to buy themselves out of any trouble they get into as well.

"Innocent until proven broke."

FAA doesn't apply to dragons, this was proven when some scaly sod took down an airliner.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Angelone
post Mar 15 2012, 01:05 AM
Post #13


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,170
Joined: 24-May 05
From: A 10x10 room with an orc and a treasure chest
Member No.: 7,409



Do the drones run off of the hobo net?


--------------------
REJOICE! For bad things are about to happen.
Elder #7 of the Drop Bear Conspiracy.
la vida no vale nada
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Mar 15 2012, 02:37 AM
Post #14


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 13,808
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Angelone @ Mar 14 2012, 08:05 PM) *
Do the drones run off of the hobo net?
Not yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daylen
post Mar 20 2012, 11:24 PM
Post #15


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,420
Joined: 7-December 09
From: Freedonia
Member No.: 17,952



QUOTE (Angelone @ Mar 15 2012, 01:05 AM) *
Do the drones run off of the hobo net?

Just hobo fat and farts like the pigs from Bartertown.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 11:59 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.