IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Layoffs?, Well, do corps do that?
Penta
post Sep 18 2005, 05:52 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



I had a stupid thought whilst reading a thread...

Has there ever been any mention in SR of a mega laying people off?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Trax
post Sep 18 2005, 05:55 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 2-January 05
From: Quebec
Member No.: 6,924



I can't think of anything off-hand, but like any business, people are often let go for one reason or another.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 18 2005, 06:08 PM
Post #3


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Threats 2, Art Dankwalther gets laid off IIRC. Also in System Failure it mentions that he has a twinge of conscience when the damage he does to Novatech causes them to engage in a round of layoffs.

That said, it's not very common. Shadowrun businesses are the businesses of the 80s. You may be a corporate slave, but you were a corporate slave for life short of major screwups.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Sep 19 2005, 12:38 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



Given the scope of megacorporate operations, I'd expect layoffs to be handled like base closings. Civilian contractors will be out of luck, but the corporate people will be redistributed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penta
post Sep 19 2005, 02:08 AM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



Like BRAC?

Ouch.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Sep 19 2005, 02:16 AM
Post #6


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



I agree with Mercer. "Well we've decided to close out facility in Great Falls but since you are already cleared with us and know our routines you can accept our offer to relocate you to our complex in Bilouxi. You call. If not you can stay in the corp housing here until the end of the month, bye."
In the dangerous world of 2065 I think most people will stay with the mega.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lodestar
post Sep 19 2005, 05:13 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 424
Joined: 11-May 02
From: Marauding the mighty North Saskatchewan
Member No.: 2,720



Especailly given the investment some of the corps might make in their personell, or the insider info said personell might have. In many cases in the world of SR such personell might conviniently disappear.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hahnsoo
post Sep 19 2005, 05:27 PM
Post #8


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,587
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 7,014



We don't lay off anyone. *polishes barrel of a machine gun*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Sep 19 2005, 05:30 PM
Post #9


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Instead it's a fabulous 3 week vacation to the Corp R&R(D) facility in the Carribean League. Sadly though, it's a higher than anticipated season for Pirate activity, many hands have been lost this year to them...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penta
post Sep 19 2005, 07:23 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



QUOTE (lodestar)
Especailly given the investment some of the corps might make in their personell, or the insider info said personell might have. In many cases in the world of SR such personell might conviniently disappear.

Maybe for executive types, but for line grunts?

This is part of the problem with the 80s model. It makes no sense.

(Now, haven't we had rumblings of corps in SR moving more to a 1990s "quick-to-hire, quick-to-fire" mode of HR? I forget.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Traks
post Sep 19 2005, 09:31 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 226
Joined: 4-June 03
Member No.: 4,685



Not really. Most of corp people are pretty much brainwashed, so they WANT to help their corp "stay afloat" or whatever dumb idea they have. And people who work for idea generally work better than those taken for 3-month contract.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Sep 20 2005, 12:03 AM
Post #12


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



I doubt it's so much they really care about the company so much as their will has been broken and they don't really care to search for a job anywhere else. You see this happenning far too often at crappy companies; people convince themselves that either 1) they're not good enough to get a job anywhere else, or 2) anywhere else will be just as bad. It's how bad companies can still manage to employ good people.

I say that Demotivation seems to be the business paradigm of the '60s. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 20 2005, 12:47 AM
Post #13


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



The idea of corporate loyalty is near-omnipresent in older sourcebooks and novels—several prime characters (including Sam Verner) go through a "woah, wait, the corp isn't really my mommy?" phase.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rev
post Sep 20 2005, 10:22 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 675
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 2,034



I think it is a lot more interesting and realistic if you heavily stratify company loyalty. Above some level the employees are mostly fanatically loyal and when a branch is closed down, sold, etc these people are usually kept and moved elsewhere in the company. Below some level the employees are easily replacable cogs, and know it. They are sacked whenever it is convenient to management, and probably aren't even working for the mega in some technical sense. Then there is the even less happy middle where they think they are close enough to getting into the top group (though it very rarely actually happens) that they are all trying to act fanatically loyal, but are treated like cogs (like temps at microsoft, or wherever).

Of course people in the higher level are being kicked out pretty frequently as well, the survivors are just indoctrinated well enough that they pretend it isn't happening.

Then there is the really high level where the loyalty is entirely a facade to keep the upper bottom level in line, those people are loyal to some faction of the company, though the people at the top of the faction are just pretending loyalty to the faction to keep the people below them in line. :)

Anyway everybody hates everybody below and above them, though many of them pretend not too and far more people are moving down than up in the company. This implies that young people are often starting out pretty high for no good reason, then falling through thier careers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Conskill
post Sep 21 2005, 05:35 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 7-November 04
Member No.: 6,811



Well, remember. These aren't just corporations, these are micro (and not-so-micro) nations. You don't just work at Renraku, you eat at Renraku resturants, rent a Renraku apartment, go to play a Renraku-approved Simsense game. You pay for all of this with your Renraku corp-script which is tied into your corporate-provided SIN which is being transmitted by the credstick / commlink you probably from a corporate store. Afterward you retire for a quiet evening of work-at-home while listening to Renraku Presents: 50 Greatest Hits of the 2040s.

Leaving a megacorp would be closer to defecting from your country than quitting your job.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Westiex
post Sep 21 2005, 10:56 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 30-September 04
Member No.: 6,715



A 'country' which is free to use subliminals all any manner of advertising tricks to make sure that the corporate peons stay loyal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Sep 21 2005, 12:20 PM
Post #17


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Man... Yeah, that's pretty flucked up. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr. Unpronouncea...
post Sep 21 2005, 06:47 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 829
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 770



Why do layoffs when you can give your loyal employees exciting new opportunities in the research department?


Its not like the 'test subject' position is likely to have a pension that actively needs to be funded.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Sep 21 2005, 07:20 PM
Post #19


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



Economically, there are reasons to keep some employees and fire others.

Workforce experience is part general, part specialised to the corp in question. Low skilled labour tends to be general experience, customer relationship is specialised because of the personal connection between manager and customer.

If I sack an unskilled worker, I lose nothing. Yes, that happens. If I sack a manager, I might lose knowledge that has to be build up and is not available on the market. Might be a good idea nonetheless, but that depends.



To the "megacorp = nation"-notion: Yes.

Ares Arms will be more careful with key UCAS facilities than a russian noName producer of AKs. Aparent loss of safety of corp employment reduces loyality of the whole workforce, not desireable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Sep 21 2005, 08:27 PM
Post #20


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



You Are Not Paid to Think

A Mindless Worker is a Happy Worker.

Shut Up and Do Your Job

--From Matt Groening's "Futurama"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Sep 21 2005, 08:29 PM
Post #21


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Mr. Unpronounceable)
Why do layoffs when you can give your loyal employees exciting new opportunities in the research department?


Its not like the 'test subject' position is likely to have a pension that actively needs to be funded.

Hmmm.. Like Lewis at DrugCO from the Drew Carey show...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Sep 21 2005, 08:29 PM
Post #22


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Mom's Friendly Robot Company is so a AA megacorp it's not funny.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Sep 21 2005, 09:02 PM
Post #23


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



I'd say that, statistically, an upper management employee is more likely to be laid off than the lowest manual laboror simply because of politics. No one cares about the peopel at the bottom so they are realitivly safe. The people a tthe top have plenty of enemies and some fiascos demand an upper manager or even an oficer play sacrifical goat (metaphoricly for most corps, literally for Aztechnology).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th July 2025 - 04:07 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.