IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wise Warrior....
Squinky
post Oct 8 2005, 08:55 PM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



Reading the description of the Wise Warrior Mentor Spirit, it mentions followers having to follow the Warriors code of honor....I know theres probably nothing more mentioned on this in the book, so I was wondering what you guys would include in this code of honor that would be cool for rolepplaying purposes....I'm kinda drawing a blank...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nkari
post Oct 8 2005, 09:05 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 135
Joined: 30-July 04
From: Orebro, Sweden
Member No.: 6,523



Keepings ones word.
Fighting Honorable vs honorable enemies.. (ie no ambushes, shooting a unarmed opponent etc..)
As little collateral dmg as possible, both to "civilians" and surrounding property.

And the normal stuff, if you have to steal, dont steal more than you need to survive etc..

And what siege said.. :P

EDIT: spelling etc..

This post has been edited by Nkari: Oct 9 2005, 12:39 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 8 2005, 09:13 PM
Post #3


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



It really depends on your GM's interpretation.

Going with the stereotypical, Paladin-esque approach, I'd think:
  1. Honor
    • Your word is your bond. Do not take unfair advantage. Do not strike from behind.
  2. Bravery
    • Do not flee a battle. Cowardice is death.
  3. Loyalty
    • Do not desert your comrades in your arms.

Idle speculation. You may build a particular code based on a particular ethos, pending GM approval.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Oct 8 2005, 09:22 PM
Post #4


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



I'd say it would depend on the culture of the individual.

Japanese followers of the Wise Warrior may strongly adhere to Bushido, for example.

European followers may be more comfortable with the code of chivalry.

http://www.astro.umd.edu/~marshall/chivalry.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Oct 8 2005, 11:43 PM
Post #5


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



A mage serving Wise Warrior will probably have a strong sense of professionalism and integrity, be loyal to teammates, and refuse certain of the nastier jobs that 'runners get approached for.

But I don't think their code of honor would be too impractical in combat - this is Wise Warrior, not Stupid Warrior. In other words, things like ambushes and retreats would be allowable - they are simply good tactics. Things that wouldn't be allowable would be things like excessively endangering civilians, backstabbing a teammate to collect the bounty on his head, fleeing in panic from a moderate wound and leaving the rest of the group high and dry, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrostyNSO
post Oct 9 2005, 01:59 AM
Post #6


Resident Legionnaire
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 8-August 04
From: Usually Work
Member No.: 6,550



QUOTE (Glyph)
Things that wouldn't be allowable would be things like excessively endangering civilians, backstabbing a teammate to collect the bounty on his head, fleeing in panic from a moderate wound and leaving the rest of the group high and dry, etc.

Oh, but that stuff never happens anyways, so...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Oct 9 2005, 02:04 AM
Post #7


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (FrostyNSO)
QUOTE (Glyph @ Oct 8 2005, 06:43 PM)
Things that wouldn't be allowable would be things like excessively endangering civilians, backstabbing a teammate to collect the bounty on his head, fleeing in panic from a moderate wound and leaving the rest of the group high and dry, etc.

Oh, but that stuff never happens anyways, so...

:spin: :rotfl: :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
warrior_allanon
post Oct 9 2005, 02:09 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 775
Joined: 31-March 05
From: florida
Member No.: 7,273



i have to agree with blackie here, i have had team mates turn me in for the 12 million bounty that was on my head, (granted it was alive) of course they then broke me out again and split the cash with me

(tends to happen when you torque off the mob)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thorncrow
post Oct 9 2005, 04:16 PM
Post #9


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Virginia Beach
Member No.: 7,807



Also, those of you who are into martial philosophy should read The Life-Giving Sword by Yagyu Munenori, in it he states flat-out: "Deception is the way of war." This coming from a man who was the personal sword instructor and bodyguard to three generations of shoguns. No man ever questioned his integrity and he definitely fills the role of the "Wise Warrior". So in game context ambushes, assassinations, and "duplicitous" activity all fall under the aegis of waging war through deception and trickery, but I would say in personal combat and a duel type encounter is where the code of combat ethics would come into play.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 9 2005, 05:31 PM
Post #10


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



A soldier tends to be a different breed from the rugged individualist, the archtypical "Hero" warrior of myth and legend.

And that's what Totems are - idealized perceptions of concepts and belief systems.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Oct 10 2005, 02:39 AM
Post #11


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



I alwats assumed that the 'heroic warrori' was dragonslayer. With the 'wise warrior' being the one who works in teams and is willing to use methods other than open combat. The cyclops was blinded, not because Odysseus could take him out mano-a-mano, but because Odysseus was a sneaky bastard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 10 2005, 02:41 AM
Post #12


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Would you consider Odysseus a "Wise Warrior" archetype?

Sorry, playing Devil's advocate.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Oct 10 2005, 03:01 AM
Post #13


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Well, he could qualify as either trickster of wise warrior. However, he often manuvers so that his martial skill can be better applied. He thinks up the Trojan Horse, not as a party favor, but so that he can better kill stuff. Once he arrives back home, he manuvers his way to the martial challenge (the bow shooting).

In short, he frequently applies martial strenght, as well as 'trickery'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 10 2005, 03:05 AM
Post #14


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



That's Odyesseus the man, not the idiolized, archetypal figure of "The Wise Warrior."

That was my obscure point about soldiers not being the same as the romanticized notion of Knights, Paladins and similar romantic and unrealistic figures.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Oct 10 2005, 12:28 PM
Post #15


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I think Siege brings up a good point, even if he disagrees with it. We have plenty of warrior characters throughout history and in legend who are tricky before they're direct. Odyesseus cetainly is idolized. Just because he's not King Arthur or Gawain, I don't see why he might not be considered for a wise warrior. Looking back, especially in Eastern cultures (well, Eastern, American and African cultures. Pretty much everyone but Europe), they were smart enough to know that most wise warriors were also deceptive warriors. Sun Tzu talks about this all the time. My memory of Bushido is fuzzy, but I don't recollect anything saying 'you must let your enemy arm himself before attacking', and I do remember 'make sure you have a weapon by you when you take a bath'. Native American braves were definitely trained to be sneaky first, and Shaka of the Zulus achieved fame in part because of his new techniques to hide his people during an attack. Stealth is an indispensable part of combat (unless you're a walking tank like a mounted knight). Try to fight without it, and you're not very wise in my opinion.

And then you have the whole ninja class, who we KNOW are idolized in 2060 as crazy secret fighters who never miss unless there's more than one of them.

Personally, I'd say it depends on the character, but it certainly needs to be something limiting. There's no reason that two wise warriors must have the same code.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nkari
post Oct 10 2005, 12:46 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 135
Joined: 30-July 04
From: Orebro, Sweden
Member No.: 6,523



We can debate Martial Honor all day long and come to no common ground that can be applied to everyone. Hence, we should decide what culture the "wise warrior" comes from and wich philosophy we want to act acording to.

Like Nezumi said.. tho its is quite interesting discussing martial honor etc.. :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Oct 10 2005, 01:26 PM
Post #17


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



I've always seen Wise Warrior as Athena/Minerva.
Since see was Odysseus's imortal patron, iot would seem to fit okay with him as wise warrior.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gothic Rose
post Oct 10 2005, 10:02 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 7,803



I always assumed Wise Warrior to be Confucius.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Oct 10 2005, 11:49 PM
Post #19


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Err... Confuscius wasn't a warrior, as far as I was aware.

I always thought the Wise Warrior was the Monkey King, who peed in Buddha's hand.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gothic Rose
post Oct 10 2005, 11:58 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 7,803



That's what I get for posting when tired and distracted.

I meant Sun Tzu.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 11 2005, 03:36 AM
Post #21


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Yes, I can see how one could confuse the two. :grinbig:

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2026 - 06:11 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.