IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Using the "No Soaking Roll" option, ...and keeping Body useful
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 11:39 AM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



One thing I loved in past Shadowrun editions rules was the relative quickness of combat rules, due to the fact that the target and the attacker both rolled once to figure out if the attack lands, and how much damage the victim would suffer. The new rules add another dice roll, now every combat attack is an opposed test: before you'd roll your attack, and the defender would roll the soak test. Now, before the soak, the defender rolls his evasive action too.

I'm considering using this "official" rule tweak:

QUOTE (Shadowrun 4 @ p. 69)
ē To cut down on dice rolling during combat, you could drop Damage Resistance Tests entirely, reducing combat to a single Opposed Test. In this case, Armor would deduct directly from the attack's DV..


But if I do that, Body is quite less useful. It only adds half its rating to the damage boxes, and that's all.

So, a solution I see is making the number of boxes in the Damage Monitor [Body]+5 instead of [Body /2]+8. Same for Stun Monitor ([Willpower]+5) and Matrix Monitor ([System]+5).

Waddaya think about it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Ben
post Oct 12 2005, 12:12 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 600
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,659



I think I'd play a Troll (+1) with orthoskin (+3), an armored jacket (+8) and a helmet (+1) for a total of 13 ballistic armor at char gen.

Now I'm immune to pistols, most melee weapons, and darn near ANYTHING else if ballistic directly subtracts from DV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 12:35 PM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Lord Ben)
I think I'd play a Troll (+1) with orthoskin (+3), an armored jacket (+8 ) and a helmet (+1) for a total of 13 ballistic armor at char gen.

Now I'm immune to pistols, most melee weapons, and darn near ANYTHING else if ballistic directly subtracts from DV.

Don't forget your hits on the to hit roll adding to the DV. And I would use armor as in the rules, so ballistic substract from projectile, impact from blunt and melee and half ballistic from special damage like fire or acid.

And hell, if you're ready to spend 58 build points (40 (troll) + 18 (90.000 :nuyen: orthoskin) ) just to be tough and hang around in armored jacket and helmet most of the time, then be invulnerable to bullets if that's your thing - you payed enough for that.

And you forget that, if you spend some more build points on your big bad troll's Body (say 65), you havea Body rating of 10, so with my house rule, you have 15 damage boxes on the top of that (instead of 13 in the old system). So yeah, if you spend 118 build points (more than a quarter of your starting stash), you won't mind bullets.

I have no problem with that. If I were to take a big bull, lace some kind of high-tech armor in its own skin, put a kevlar blanket on it, and then empty an entire uzi clip on him, I don't think it would mind. And a Troll is even bulkier than a bull, as I see it. No fall of logic here.

I don't see invulnerability to bullets as a gamebreaker either. After all, even with a Willpower rating of 6 (and that would cost you 65 more build points, if I'm not mistaken), that only gets you two hits average against a Mana Bolt - cast by a Magic 5, Sorcery 5 (combat spells +2) spellslinger, for example (four hits average). Without overcasting that gets you to cross 7 boxes on your Stun Damage Monitor. That means a -2 dice penalty on all your actions, and only 5 boxes left to cross for the next Mana Bolt.

Wow, I wrote a novel here. Thanks for pointing that out, but to me, that's not a problem. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Ben
post Oct 12 2005, 12:42 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 600
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,659



Well, from my IC perspective any mage that mana bolts me is going to die in the next 2 seconds. Full auto from AR narrow burst gives me 15 dice after recoil comp, (5 successes), plus 17DV -3AP from the shot itself. I'd spend edge if I needed, to, but I doubt it.

The game is pretty well balanced. It doesn't take long at all to dodge/soak, etc. You just need to make sure your players can do addition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 12:54 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Lord Ben)
Well, from my IC perspective any mage that mana bolts me is going to die in the next 2 seconds. Full auto from AR narrow burst gives me 15 dice after recoil comp, (5 successes), plus 17DV -3AP from the shot itself. I'd spend edge if I needed, to, but I doubt it.

The game is pretty well balanced. It doesn't take long at all to dodge/soak, etc. You just need to make sure your players can do addition.

Okay, your answer is "I'm happy with the rules as they are, and I don't find the extra roll to be a pain".

But the question was: "what are you thinking of using (Rating)+5 damage boxes instead of (rating/2)+8 if you're using the rule tweak on p. 69?"

Maybe I didn't make myself understood.

And again, it's not a matter of wether or not using this rule. I'm using it because I'd like to. I felt that Body (and Willpower) would be underused if I'd do so. I figured out a houserule that, IMHO, would fix that. I'm just asking if you think that would work.

Answering me "don't use this houserule" is missing the point a bit, isn't it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nkari
post Oct 12 2005, 01:12 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 135
Joined: 30-July 04
From: Orebro, Sweden
Member No.: 6,523



Body is useless until you need it.. then you wish you had more.. :P
Same goes for willpower.. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 01:24 PM
Post #7


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Nkari @ Oct 12 2005, 08:12 AM)
Body is useless until you need it.. then you wish you had more.. :P
Same goes for willpower..  :D

I'm not saying that Body (and Willpower) is useless in general. I feel it could be far less useful if I use the quoted rules.

Do you think Body and Willpower are less usefull if I skip damage soak and simply deduct armor rating from DV? If that's the case, do you think making the number of boxes [Body]+5 instead of [Body /2]+8 would help?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Ben
post Oct 12 2005, 02:03 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 600
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,659



I think that the houserule of subtracting armor from DV would disproportionally benefit Troll Street Sams, another houserule of changing body to be better would also benefit Troll's more than other races as well.

Also, what about bone density and titanium bone lacing? Their benefit is to increase body for purposes of resisting damage. Do those cyberwear peices just go away or do you introduce another houserule to change those?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 02:19 PM
Post #9


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Lord Ben)
I think that the houserule of subtracting armor from DV would disproportionally benefit Troll Street Sams, another houserule of changing body to be better would also benefit Troll's more than other races as well.


I heard that. I agree, but that's not a problem for me. As I said, your Body 10, Will 6, level 3 Orthoskin Troll costs you 118 build points and 1.5 essence. For me, that's expensive enough to be bulletproof.

And that's not a houserule. That's an official rule tweak, since it's in the book, done by the game designers. I'm not *that* anal, mind you, but I heard some here are. :D

QUOTE (Lord Ben)
Also, what about bone density and titanium bone lacing?† Their benefit is to increase body for purposes of resisting damage.† Do those cyberwear peices just go away or do you introduce another houserule to change those?


Well, since the Body of the recipient is augmented, so are his number of physical damage boxes. And, since they have more damage boxes, they are more resilient to damage. QOD.

Exempli gratia: with the "normal" system, the aforementionned Troll with a Bone Density Augmentation 4 would roll 22 dice to soak (5,5 hits on average) and have 15 damage boxes. With the "no roll soak" tweak and the "5+body boxes" houserule, he would soak the same (his damage rating, fixed) but would have 19 damage boxes. In both case, he would cost 16 BP (80.000 :nuyen: and 1,2 essence more, raising the BP cost to be that tough to 134 BP and 1,95 essence points.

That's just what I aim to fix: the fact that, if you use the rulestweak of p.69 regarding soak rolls, you lose a bit of Body effectiveness. By making damage boxes number more related to Body rating, it may be fixed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Oct 12 2005, 02:42 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



Body, using the RAW, has a quickly compound-scaling usefulness when it comes to character survivability.

1) Every 2 more points of Body gives you an extra "hit point" of physical damage capacity.

2) Every 3 more points of Body, on average, negates 1 DV of incoming physical damage per attack.

3) Every 1.5 more points of Body, on average, heals 1 "hit point" of physical damage per day and every 3 more points of Body heals an average 1 "hit point" of Stun per hour.

So loosely -- if you got hit only once per day -- every 6 points of Body typically negates 9 boxes (+3 physical boxes + 2 DV soaked + 4 boxes healed) of physical damage per day. Simplifying that ratio, you're looking at 2 Body getting rid of 3 physical boxes.

Ignoring the healing aspect of it, you're looking at 6 points of Body mitigating a total of 5 boxes of Physical damage if you get hit once, or 7 if you get hit twice, 9 if three times, et cetera. The formula comes to Body mitigating (Body/2) + ((Body/3)*incoming attacks) damage on average.

EDIT: Typos, typos!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Oct 12 2005, 02:44 PM
Post #11


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Lord Ben)
I think I'd play a Troll (+1) with orthoskin (+3), an armored jacket (+8) and a helmet (+1) for a total of 13 ballistic armor at char gen.

Now I'm immune to pistols, most melee weapons, and darn near ANYTHING else if ballistic directly subtracts from DV.

You still also have to roll dice, and a bit better than average, to fully avoid Stun damage from even regular ammo Light Pistol that scored a single net success. That's 4+1=5DV. With 13 armour you'll average only a little more than 4 hits.

You certainly aren't immune to Stick-n-Shock in a holdout. :smokin:

P.S. That weeping you hear is Baby Jesus. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Ben
post Oct 12 2005, 02:53 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 600
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,659



That's just the armor rating, tack 13 body on top of that if you're using the normal rules. And my armor has rating 6 non-conductivity! 8)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Oct 12 2005, 02:59 PM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



If you just don't like rolling to soak, divide all armor values by 3 and have those ratings subtract from the DV. Same for Body and Body modifiers if you want.

Ballistic 6 means -2 DV flat out, for instance. Impact 4 means -1 DV.

It decreases armor variation a bit, but the odds will work out the same. I'd advise keeping the Body rolls just so you can spend Edge on something in clutch situations. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Oct 12 2005, 03:16 PM
Post #14


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Lord Ben @ Oct 12 2005, 08:53 AM)
That's just the armor rating, tack 13 body on top of that if you're using the normal rules.† And my armor has rating 6 non-conductivity!† 8)

Ah, right. I'm sooo looking forward to flamethrowers. At least forcing you to purchase enhancement too. Of course you do know you are just a begging for engulfing Fire/Water Elementals? Maybe you should invest in that fire resistance early? You don't have enough room on your armour to get a full 6 points? Aaaah too bad.

P.S. The Acid Wave casting magicians/Spirits of Man are waiting in the wings. ;) As are the Ares Squirt guns.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 03:24 PM
Post #15


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Azralon)
If you just don't like rolling to soak, divide all armor values by 3 and have those ratings subtract from the DV. Same for Body and Body modifiers if you want. (snip)

I thought of that too, but I find the other method (the tiny house rule I presented) simplier while keeping more or less the same results. The actual variations of result I noticed between the two methods don't bother me so far, but I'd like to see if the people roaming around the biggest SR forum can point me out if I didn't notice other odd results my houserule might produce.

Thanks for the imput, though. I'm gonna ponder that.

Oh, and if my grammar and synthax is a bit odd at times, that's normal. I'm Belgian. We make funny sentences here, in Belgium.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 03:26 PM
Post #16


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (blakkie)
Ah, right. I'm sooo looking forward to flamethrowers. At least forcing you to purchase enhancement too. Of course you do know you are just a begging for engulfing Fire/Water Elementals? Maybe you should invest in that fire resistance early? You don't have enough room on your armour to get a full 6 points? Aaaah too bad.

The moral here is: you can get a tank if you want to - and if you pay for it - but there always be a punk out there with a antitank weapon.

And the GM don't have BP limits if he feels like it. :smokin:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Ben
post Oct 12 2005, 03:27 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 600
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,659



Is there something that limits how much enhancements you can put on armor? I didn't think so. It has an avail, but not a +X avail. So you can stack all you want.

I'm not saying I'm invincible (actually I really play an Orc so knock 2 soak off that theoretical Troll), just that I can take a licking and keep on ticking.

But the point of the thread is the rule. I don't like it since it's a houserule to affect an optional rule. Then by the time you houserule bone density you're houseruling a crapload of stuff.

Taking total soak /3 is probably the best way of doing it. Just a fixed TN.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 12 2005, 03:28 PM
Post #18


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (GregPogor)
We make funny sentences here, in Belgium.

Waffles too! :lick:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 12 2005, 03:31 PM
Post #19


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



The whole SR4 mechanic is no more time-consuming or complex than SR3's roll-to-hit/dodge/soak combination, except that it's a little more streamlined and elegant under SR4. I don't really seen the need to speed the game up even more by taking the random element out of armor, and making combat even more abstract.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 03:41 PM
Post #20


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Lord Ben @ Oct 12 2005, 10:27 AM)
But the point of the thread is the rule.  I don't like it since it's a houserule to affect an optional rule.  Then by the time you houserule bone density you're houseruling a crapload of stuff.

Just to make it clear: I'm not houseruling Bone Density. You keep saying that, but that's not making it true.

I'm just using the house rule here. Bone Density gives you more Body. Body adds to damage boxes. Since my houserule adds more extra damage box per Body points, you get more boxes for your buck instead of adding your extra Body points to the soaking (since you're not soaking).

So, ANYTHING THAT ADDS A POINT TO YOUR BODY RATING ADDS A BOX OF DAMAGE ON YOUR CONDITION MONITOR, because TO FIGURE OUT YOUR NUMBER OF DAMAGE BOXES WITH THIS ONE HOUSERULE, YOU ADD 5 TO YOUR BODY RATING. See? Maybe it's more clear in caps. There's no more rule than that. I'm not SPECIFICALY houseruling Bone Density. Bone Density is "houseruled" per se since it adds points to body rating, and the houserule modifies the Body rating / Extra damage box ratio.

So, if ONLY ONE houserule is "a crapload stuff", yes, you're right, I'm houseruling a crapload of stuff. But I don't think that's the case here, and despite your repeating of "this rule suxxors!" I still plan to do it.

But that's not even the question.

What's the question? I wrote it three or four times in this thread. Find it. Read it. Provide an answer.

EDIT: okay, you did it. I'm sorry for assuming you didn't. Okay, you don't want to houserule your game, but between the two rules, you prefer dividing the total soak by 3. Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Oct 12 2005, 03:43 PM
Post #21


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



I agree with Fortune. The new system requires so little math on the fly (especially compared to SR3) that I don't see a reason to eliminate soak rolls. Soak rolls as they stand allow us to keep our "hit points" (aka "damage boxes") down to a low, easily-eyeballed count. Just using Body to add damage boxes will start inflating the box count scale to the point where you may as well actually call them hit points.

I mean, remove soaking if you really want to, but I don't have a need for it. :)

The only thing I can see that could be sped up a little is that the defender has to make a Reaction (+Dodge, maybe) roll to see if he's hit at all, and if so then a separate Body+Armor roll. The attacker gets the luxury of tossing just one set of dice.

I suppose it could be simplified by just having two colors of dice thrown at once: one for the evasion and one for the soak.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 03:49 PM
Post #22


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Azralon)
I agree with Fortune. The new system requires so little math on the fly (especially compared to SR3) that I don't see a reason to eliminate soak rolls.

I'm not really doing it for the math. The goal here is reducing the number of dice rolls. My first experience with SR4 with me as a GM was that 3 rolls was too much for a gunshot*. Reducing the number of rolls to 2 seems small business, but it's a roll that happens everytime someone gets shot, and in my SR games, it happens a lot. :D


*To be honnest, I've been shellshocked by the Deadlands combat rules and, since then, I've become very sensitive towards shitloads of dice rolling while playing a combat scene.

QUOTE (Fortune)
Waffles too! :)


Woohoo! Waffles!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Oct 12 2005, 03:49 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (GregPogor)
So, if ONLY ONE houserule is "a crapload stuff", yes, you're right, I'm houseruling a crapload of stuff. But I don't think that's the case here, and despite your repeating of "this rule suxxors!" I still plan to do it.

If all Body does is add to damage boxes, then tougher people will take longer to fully recover with natural healing. Magical healing will be less proportionately effective.

If you're comfortable with that, then cool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Ben
post Oct 12 2005, 03:55 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 600
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,659



Yes, but you're wrong. Bone Density only increases body for damage resistance tests. And with your alternate rule there is no more damage resistance test. Thus no benefit other than physical damage.

Bone Density Augmentation: In a long and painful
process, the molecular matrix of the subjectís bones are altered
for density and strength. The procedure also strengthens
ligaments, but as a side effect increases the characterís
weight. Increase the recipientís Body by the bone density
rating for damage resistance tests. Characters with bone
density deal Physical damage in unarmed combat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregPogor
post Oct 12 2005, 04:34 PM
Post #25


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 7,786



QUOTE (Lord Ben)
Yes, but you're wrong. Bone Density only increases body for damage resistance tests. And with your alternate rule there is no more damage resistance test. Thus no benefit other than physical damage.

YOU MEAN I'M HAVING THIS ARGUMENT BECAUSE OF MY MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE RULES??? IT CAN'T BE!

:shake fist:

I just re-read the rules and crap, you're right about that :) So yeah, I must add that "every bonus die added by whatever mean, either temporarily or permanently, to any damage reduction test adds a relevant damage box instead". And you're right that two is begining to look like too many.

QUOTE (Azralon)
If all Body does is add to damage boxes, then tougher people will take longer to fully recover with natural healing. Magical healing will be less proportionately effective.


Well, Body's still rolled for healing tests. And it's already the case with the rules as written, since healing rules are basically a Hit/Damage box healed trade on a diceroll: the more damage boxes you have to heal, regardless of the maximum rating, the more success you need, IIRC.

So yeah, i'm cool with it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st December 2023 - 09:22 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.