IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What's your Favorite SMG?, Voice your opinion.
Favorite SMG?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 122
Guests cannot vote 
Eddie Furious
post Oct 26 2005, 03:35 AM
Post #51


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
Well, it depends on the situation. Obviously, any SMG is better than no SMG.

If I'm going into combat in a scenario where I know my opponants are unlikely to be wearing armor, Thompson all the way. High RoF, .45 ACP, heavy as a classic car and controlable.

On the other hand, WITH armor, I think I want a main battle rifle. Failing that, I'll take the P90.

For day-to-day carry, I'd say Uzi or a MicroUzi, or perhaps even a Glock 19 machine pistol. (I think it's the glock 19. Don't hold me to it.)

Depends, am I packing a Carbine and have the drop on you? It's not the firearm, its the operator. I know men who have used Browning HPs to kill soldiers armed with Port Said AK-47s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eddie Furious
post Oct 26 2005, 03:37 AM
Post #52


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (FrostyNSO)
QUOTE (Ed_209a @ Oct 25 2005, 06:24 PM)
I cannot remember the source, but I have also read about P90 magazines losing rounds when dropped.

Any magazine can lose round or two when dropped, especially when full...shit happens. If you've dropped your magazine on the ground, your problems are greater than the two rounds that popped out 8)

Heh, Pack 'em too tight and you have trouble getting the buggers into battery!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lindt
post Oct 26 2005, 03:40 AM
Post #53


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



QUOTE (Arethusa)
The Mac 10/11 series can be powerful; there are variants from .380ACP up to .45ACP. It's not a single gun.

Wow, I was going to vote for the Tomson (I did anyway), but the idea of a mac-10 in .45 just seems like a lovely way to ruin your wrist (and everyone downrange's day).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Oct 26 2005, 03:41 AM
Post #54


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
For day-to-day carry, I'd say Uzi or a MicroUzi, or perhaps even a Glock 19 machine pistol. (I think it's the glock 19. Don't hold me to it.)

Nope, the 19's just their compact (not sub-compact, mind, just compact) 9mm. Either that, or there's some super secret "full auto" button somewhere on mine that I just haven't found yet, in which case I'm very excited. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eddie Furious
post Oct 26 2005, 03:48 AM
Post #55


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (Cray74)
Since the advent of burst-firing heavy pistols (and with easy access to high concealability assault rifles), I've had little use for SR's SMGs. About all I use is the Supermach for its compact suppressive fire fun.

Not so fast there tex. According to your logic every HRT would be kitted out with Glock 18s and M93Rs. Yet we still see full size firearms. The reasons being, accuracy (longer barrel, better sight radius), controllability (more mass and surface area/length to help absorb recoil), heat dissipation, optionability (the accessories (crap) you throw on the weapon) & the benefit of a full buttstock (collapsible, fixed or nonconventional).

These things are important for any HRT, accuracy will mean you kill the terrorist and not the hostage, controllability will mean the second and third round will be closer to the mark when you Mozambique him and the heat dissipation means you don't burn your little fingers when there is a protracted engagement. Optionability is a benefit because it can do a lot to improve your weapons performance.

Now having said that, sometimes you just need to go through a window with no more than a 9mm pistol and a few extra 20rd magazines.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eddie Furious
post Oct 26 2005, 03:50 AM
Post #56


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (Critias)
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685 @ Oct 25 2005, 02:29 PM)
For day-to-day carry, I'd say Uzi or a MicroUzi, or perhaps even a Glock 19 machine pistol. (I think it's the glock 19. Don't hold me to it.)

Nope, the 19's just their compact (not sub-compact, mind, just compact) 9mm. Either that, or there's some super secret "full auto" button somewhere on mine that I just haven't found yet, in which case I'm very excited. ;)

When you find that secret button, be sure that you're ready for it, them Glock19s ain't too heavy...
:grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Oct 26 2005, 03:56 AM
Post #57


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



It's not that bad...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Oct 26 2005, 03:58 AM
Post #58


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (Lindt)
QUOTE (Arethusa @ Oct 25 2005, 12:55 PM)
The Mac 10/11 series can be powerful; there are variants from .380ACP up to .45ACP.  It's not a single gun.

Wow, I was going to vote for the Tomson (I did anyway), but the idea of a mac-10 in .45 just seems like a lovely way to ruin your wrist (and everyone downrange's day).

Personally, I'm a big fan of the .380ACP M11.

1600 rounds per minute is death-hose beautiful.

Second place for the .45ACP M10, but only with the ridiculously large suppressor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eddie Furious
post Oct 26 2005, 04:05 AM
Post #59


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (Raygun)
It's not that bad...

Looks to me that he was ready for it. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Link
post Oct 26 2005, 04:46 AM
Post #60


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 519
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Queensland
Member No.: 3,180



Eddie, Cray74 was talking about SR and without the optional Heat Dissipation rules. :D

As for favourite SMG, I went for the MP5. Like BMW, Bose & Beckenbauer, it has that germanic quality of precision with a dash of style.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Krazy
post Oct 26 2005, 05:01 AM
Post #61


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 149
Joined: 21-March 05
From: UCAS (if its tuesday)
Member No.: 7,200



as has been said, take the tool for the job. I stated my prefrence, and why I didn't pick some of the others. and so what if some of my logic os a bit off. reason is reality, if I think somehting is true, it will effect the way I operate correct? if I think that my p-90 could have a problem hitting the floor then I won't dive so hard, may mean I'm a bit slower, see my point. I did a training course where the weapon to be issued was way our of date, and was considerably weak. ( a 4" .38 is very low on my list of wepons to take to a fight) however the reason was, they were proven, indestructable, and you would never have to worry about the gun. any moron could run one, it takes some stress out of the firefight. of course unless there was a real need for it, I'd rather carry buckshot than an SMG. funny, russian federal HRTs (no longer spetsznaz) got issued ak-74s, threw 'em out and swiched to back to shotguns for pretty much all CQB work. they have a few tricks. I love dumpshock and its perpensity for apples vs. oranges vs. mustardball arguments
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Oct 26 2005, 05:15 AM
Post #62


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Krazy)
as has been said, take the tool for the job. I stated my prefrence, and why I didn't pick some of the others. and so what if some of my logic os a bit off. reason is reality, if I think somehting is true, it will effect the way I operate correct?

Why do you seem so stubbornly decided on remaining willfully incorrect, though? I mean, you made a mistake -- accept it, and move on. Don't stand by your mistake, clinging to it like a drowning man with a piece of driftwood, or something. You were wrong, someone called you on it -- thank them for their knowledge, and truck on with the conversation. If you're wrong and someone tells you so (and they're correct), change your outlook and opinion, having had the chance to learn something.

Don't go "oh yeah? well I think this is right, so even though it's not right, I'm gonna go on thinking that it is!" like you seem to be doing. It's kind of jackassish, and immature.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrostyNSO
post Oct 26 2005, 05:23 AM
Post #63


Resident Legionnaire
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 8-August 04
From: Usually Work
Member No.: 6,550



QUOTE (Eddie Furious @ Oct 25 2005, 10:37 PM)
Heh, Pack 'em too tight and you have trouble getting the buggers into battery!

Hehe, the myth of the 31-round AR15 mag ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Krazy
post Oct 26 2005, 05:28 AM
Post #64


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 149
Joined: 21-March 05
From: UCAS (if its tuesday)
Member No.: 7,200



exactly how is that. yes I was corrected on one point. a technical detail. my bad. however I seems interesting to me that when my opinions do not mesh with someone elses world view, that I'm utterly wrong. my original post contained one techical detail, (yes I was wrong) one bit of half remembered speculation and some opinion. I accept the fact that yes having not handled any fully automatic weapons my personal experiance is not the best sourse of information. I also am a student of history, and certain weapons tend to expend more ammo to hit a target than others. I feel that it is telling that police in confrontations often worry more about the stray rounds heading past them than rounds that could hit them. unrelated question, am I the only person here that thinks that preseption is more improtant to reality? sorry bout my misinformedness jacking the thread
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 26 2005, 05:56 AM
Post #65


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



QUOTE (mmu1)
QUOTE (Musashi Forever @ Oct 25 2005, 08:14 PM)
QUOTE (Siege @ Oct 25 2005, 04:42 PM)
Although the Micro Uzi is another serious competitor in size.  Although why they fixed it with a bayonet...

That was a full size UZI with the bayonet. I think is make sense if your using them for close-quarters stuff like house to house room clearing, melee might come into play. Still, those Israelis are crazy bastards...I like it! :grinbig:

IIRC there was a period when the Israelis equipped some infantry units with Uzis as primary weapons in lieu of (unavailable) assault rifles so the bayonet thing kind of sort of makes sense.

Could be wrong about that, though...

You can make any pointed thing into a successful weapon with enough motivation, but the practical application of what essentially becomes a short spear strikes me as...well...limited.

I seem to recall something similar about the shortage of assault rifles, but don't quote me.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Oct 26 2005, 06:03 AM
Post #66


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



QUOTE (FrostyNSO)
QUOTE (Eddie Furious @ Oct 25 2005, 10:37 PM)
Heh, Pack 'em too tight and you have trouble getting the buggers into battery!

Hehe, the myth of the 31-round AR15 mag ;)

No better example of natural selection at work. It takes some effort to be that stupid. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 26 2005, 12:36 PM
Post #67


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



very literally.

why isn't my baby, the HK227-S, up there? small size, high cap, high damage, integral suppression--no full-auto is the only downside.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Oct 26 2005, 12:54 PM
Post #68


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



You attach a bayonet to your pistol so that when you throw it at superman, you can be sure he will duck to get out of the way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Taran
post Oct 26 2005, 03:45 PM
Post #69


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 164
Joined: 7-July 03
Member No.: 4,891



My favorite SMG

I play mages, what?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Musashi Forever
post Oct 26 2005, 03:53 PM
Post #70


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 523
Joined: 13-March 05
Member No.: 7,155



QUOTE (Raygun)
It's not that bad...

Thanks for the link Raygun. I never would have guessed that they would be so controllable...one handed even. I am assuming that the gun in the clip was 9mm, do the Glock MPs come in other claibers? I think 10mm would be nice, .45 too, but wouldn't that break your wrist?

Does anyone here use Flechette ammo in their SR SMGs? It seems like the bonuses you get for burst or full auto fire would make up for the armor bonus. Especially in the Supermach to make up for the lighter ammo it uses.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lindt
post Oct 26 2005, 04:05 PM
Post #71


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



QUOTE (Taran)
My favorite SMG

I play mages, what?

Very nice. Much tighter package then a P90, or a Mac-11.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Oct 26 2005, 05:37 PM
Post #72


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (Musashi Forever)
I am assuming that the gun in the clip was 9mm, do the Glock MPs come in other claibers?

The Fire Selector System for Glock Pistols can be installed on any Glock pistol, yes, including the subcompact 10mm Auto Glock 29. Breaking your wrist should be unlikely, since automatic fire is more like a steady push than a sudden slap, but I wouldn't bet on you being able to point the thing downrange for the full 10 rounds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Oct 26 2005, 05:42 PM
Post #73


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Depends. From the looks of some of the guys I've seen at the gun shop I shoot at, "downrange" counts as anything in your front arc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Oct 26 2005, 09:00 PM
Post #74


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



QUOTE (Musashi Forever)
Thanks for the link Raygun.  I never would have guessed that they would be so controllable...one handed even.  I am assuming that the gun in the clip was 9mm, do the Glock MPs come in other claibers?

Like Aus said, the FSSG is a very simple device that can be mounted to any model of Glock pistol (except the Glock 18, which is already select fire), and Glock makes pistols in .380 Auto, 9x19mm, .357 SIG, .40 S&W, 10mm Auto, .45 ACP, and .45 GAP.

The majority of the shots in that clip are of either Glock 17s or 19s (both 9x19mm), but at about 9 seconds in, you'll see close-up profile shots of two different guns firing. The first to fire is a Glock 17 (fires 18 rounds without the slide locking back, at around 1200 rpm). The second is obviously another model firing a different cartridge, but which model it actually is, I can't be sure. The ejected cases definitely look like .45 ACP, but the frame looks like a compact (as opposed to a full-size or subcompact). However, Glock doesn't make a compact .45 ACP (and this video was out a couple of years before the Glock 38 was introduced). The next closest things would be the subcompact Glock 30 or the Glock 23 in .40 S&W. Anyway, it fires 10 rounds without slide lock (at about 985 rpm). In these two shots you can also clearly see the FSSG attachment protruding from the rear end of the slide.

QUOTE
I think 10mm would be nice, .45 too, but wouldn't that break your wrist?

To back up Aus again, yeah, very unlikely. It would certainly open up your pattern dispersion. Even when he fires that .45 ACP (or at least, what I'm pretty sure is a .45 ACP), you can tell he has to fight against it a bit more.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eddie Furious
post Oct 27 2005, 03:38 AM
Post #75


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (FrostyNSO)
QUOTE (Eddie Furious @ Oct 25 2005, 10:37 PM)
Heh, Pack 'em too tight and you have trouble getting the buggers into battery!

Hehe, the myth of the 31-round AR15 mag ;)

I've seen it from time to time. Hell the Canadians had these cheap plastic Mags that they were fond of calling thier "28 round" magazines!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st August 2026 - 04:20 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.