IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Drone Commlinks?, You have HOW many hackers with you?
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 06:49 AM
Post #1


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



Ok, i was tooling around with a small idea and started reading a bit more about drones, and it says on page 240 SR4 that a rigger interface gives non-drones (Ok, it says vehicles but lets be imaginative runners) a pilot program - this basically means that you can put a rigger interface on a toaster as long as you pay the cost for the interface.

Soo, perhaps my Hacker would need some help out there in the cyberspace but does not want to rely on agents to clutter his commlink and response? Rigger interface+Commlink+autosoft= Drone hackers - add a virtual person program to add some flavor personality to your drone commlink and you are ready to go.

You basically get a pilot program with a skill of 4 and autosofts at 4 and then you just give them the programs you usually use (if you got programs at rating 5 it will use 9D6 for skill tests - very good when you want to have some cyber combat assistance.

In a combat situation you could tell them to hack enemy commlinks while you, the hacker focus on staying alive.

For fun, add the same thing to your low-end commlink and add a pilot program there too, a virtual secretary to take care of incoming calls and other tasks, and even initiate defenses against hacking (even more secure than just using agents and IC)

The main drawback is the price tag.
Every commlink would be 2,5K more expensive and the programs would cost around 2K each and would have to be bought for each program, no skill group program.

On another note, can one buy autosofts with specialization, and what would that cost be?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 11 2005, 06:55 AM
Post #2


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



Actually, it's a lot more better:

Every Pilot has all relevant Matrix Skills equal to its Ratings, needing only Programs and the Electronic Warfare Autosoft for the rest.

And since no runner worth his salt should buy a program more than once...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 11:22 AM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
Actually, it's a lot more better:

Every Pilot has all relevant Matrix Skills equal to its Ratings, needing only Programs and the Electronic Warfare Autosoft for the rest.

Where does it say that they start with matrix skills? I assumed that the only thing pilot programs carry is the basic knowledge in driving any kind of vehicle (i.e they have a pilot skill equal to their rating on any vehicle they are installed to.) Any other autosoft would have to be bought separately.

Since a modified commlink isn't a vehicle then it wouldn't have any "driving" skills but would probably need

Hacking
Cybercombat
Electronic Warfare
Computer
Software
Datasearch

Hardware might be a bit reduntant in this case...

The computer programs on the other hand poses no problems since the hacker already has them and can upload them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gothic Rose
post Nov 11 2005, 11:34 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 7,803



Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't the hacker also buy all the autosofts necessary once, and then just crack them for use on all his Dronelinks?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 11:39 AM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



QUOTE (Gothic Rose)
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't the hacker also buy all the autosofts necessary once, and then just crack them for use on all his Dronelinks?

Exactly - you buy all the programs once and upload them to each of your pilots.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Nov 11 2005, 01:53 PM
Post #6


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



QUOTE (The Jopp)
it says on page 240 SR4 that a rigger interface gives non-drones (Ok, it says vehicles but lets be imaginative runners) a pilot program

It's kind of a stretch to assume the rules intend for you to be able to rig anything. For one, all vehicles already have a pilot rating on them (for autonav), so your rigger adaptation isn't granting the vehicle a pilot rating, it's letting you connect to it using "in the vehicle" mode. Secondly, since the pilot ratings are listed for vehicles and drones, if you "rigged" your toaster, what would the pilot rating be?

It also sounds like, for what you want to do, you could just as easily use microdrones as commlinks. A dron's pilot work's like an OS with a system, responce and fireall equal to it's rating. Spend a couple-thousand to upgrade responce and use whatever system, firewall, and pilot programs you ahve laying around (probably rating 5-6) and you have the same thing... a commlink/drone that you can command (via pilot) which can run programs for you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 02:18 PM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



Well, I didn't mean as a mean to 'rig' anything but more of an option to make items not normallly associated with drones to become drones. Sure, One could use drones already but see a comlink with a pilot program more like an advanced virtual secretary that can handle several items at once including upload agents and use the comlink independently from the Hacker.

Using a regular drone as a commlink would still mean that it would need a commlink, it will still be a drone in the end. I wanted something different, in this case a modification for implanted comlinks with two pilot programs and a secondary low end comlink as the one used to the fake sin and such.

More of fun thing, but it has its tactical advantages even though it would cost a lot in a high end pilot program (rating 4) and all the relevant computer programs. You can even add "Etiquette" autosoft and even linguasofts for your virtual secretary to take care of incoming calls and dealing with people you usually don't have time for, perfect for the guy pretending that he has a large company with several VR personas taking care of different tasks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRDobbs
post Nov 11 2005, 02:28 PM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 6-October 05
Member No.: 7,818



QUOTE
this basically means that you can put a rigger interface on a toaster as long as you pay the cost for the interface


I have no problem with riggers in my game experiencing what their shaman friends experience by communing with Toaster. All hail the golden-brown totem!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Nov 11 2005, 02:32 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



I still think Drone > Commlink.

You don't have to give the drone a commlink - they basically ARE commlinks.

A commlink has an OS and a wireless link. A drone has an OS (it's pilot) and a wireless link. You can upgrade the drone to outperform (or at least match) any commlink. It can run any program your commlink can, including virtual people.

It sounds like what you want to do is to give the commlink's OS a pilot, which the drone OS's already have. (At least, I don't think that a Drone's pilot program counts against its program limit - since the rules state somewhere that the pilot IS the OS).

What I don't get, is why you can't just crack/copy that pilotted OS to any other device - but oh well.

I see what you're saying about it being cooler to have a commlink that's as smart as a drone without it having to have 6 legs, or wheels or something - and about the pilot being better than some agent program (if only for the response it saves).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 02:45 PM
Post #10


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



What makes you think one cannot copy a pilot program? You buy one of them like an agent or IC and then just install it in the device you want it in. Ah, you mean use it as a pilot program without the need of a rigger adaption. I believe that is because the adaption includes space for the pilot OS and space to run its programs independent of it's OS unlike agents who function inside the OS instead of being a separate entity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Nov 11 2005, 02:58 PM
Post #11


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



That could be it. Still, since the rules don't go into detail. By RAW, you can only rigger-adapt vehicles. Anything else would be a house-rule by your GM. :-) If he allows it, I say go for it.

One drawback would be the max-ratting of 4 (at chargen) on not only the pilot, but the underlying OS/firewall/responce/etc. Better than most commlinks, sure, but a step down from where a normal hacker would be. and it'd take nearly as much time to command them as to simply do it yourself. They could hold 4 programs without suffering - but so could your regular (upgraded to 5) commlink with an agent running on it (eating up the 5th program spot) - and those programs woudl be at rating 5 instead of 4. Alternativly, you could take a rating 5 commlink, put an agent and 9-10 other programs on it, (reducing its response/system to 4) and it would work as well as your drone-commlink, except that it would have twice as many programs avaialbe to it.

This is without the rules-fuzziness of rigger-adapting it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post Nov 11 2005, 04:37 PM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



'Sides, your coming at this half-assed backwards. You want backup hackers, yes? You don't need to go drone modifiying commlinks of shit like that.

Buy a second commlink. Subcribe it to your first one. Buy an agent program at level 4 and crack that sumnabitch.

Load as many agents onto commlink 2 as you feel required. You'll fill up that commlinks subscription list fast, but don't subscribe them to your primary commlink. Give 1 agent the command progrem. Call him Leftenant jones or something. He's your seargent. Subscribe him to your main commlink.

When you need your agent army to do something, use command to give an order to your seargent. "Sarge, tell the boys to crack that system." Sarge then uses his actions to give orders to the required agents, while you go on your own merry way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 11 2005, 05:15 PM
Post #13


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (The Jopp)
Where does it say that they start with matrix skills?

QUOTE (SR4 p. 214 Pilot Programs)
In game terms, the Pilot attribute stands in for Computer, Cybercombat, Data Search, and Hacking skills, as called for. It may also represent an agent, IC, or drone’s “Mental attributes” when called for (usually Intuition and Logic, and sometimes Willpower).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 05:41 PM
Post #14


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



Interesting, that means that onewon't need to buy that kind of autosofts. neat, makes the idea simpler.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Nov 11 2005, 05:49 PM
Post #15


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



Also, ordering a drone to do something complicated means the GM can put some nasty modifiers in there... Like, tehre is a difference between saying "Use this particular exploit to hack into their system (which I have already determined is vulnarable to)" and "Find the weakness in their network, and exploit it".

Or between saying "Crash that IC with this program which I loaded you out with earlier" and saying "Um, crash that IC... whip up some code on the fly to do it."

Tasking them with something even more complicated like "Okay, drone, break into this node, and lcoate any data about Girly-Puff's cereal. Download it, and then log out. While doing that, I want you to avoid being noticed, but if you think you have triggered a system alert, I want you to keep an eye out for IC. If you see any, crash it." would probably be far beyond the abilities of a rating 3-4 drone. That's AI stuff right there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post Nov 11 2005, 06:06 PM
Post #16


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



Right, which is why you only give teh drones simple commands and do the hacking yourself. Things like "Watch for IC and if you see any, attack it" seems well within the capabilities of a rating 3/4 agent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Nov 11 2005, 06:13 PM
Post #17


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



Sure - something like that, seems fine - a drone could do that with real-life threats, so why not online ones?

Also, I'm not 100% certain that if you have a second commlink attached to yoru first, when yo ugo online, you don't have access to those programs. They would either be agents looking for IC in their node (the second offline commlink) or they would need to be uploaded as usual, or moved to your (online) commlink.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 09:33 PM
Post #18


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



A few fun good things with drone commlinks would be the following:

Anyone hacking your commlink and disabling your agent program has to fight a pilot program who will be fighting to take back the system, something an agent would be unable to do as soon as the system is infiltrated and taken care of, the drone pilot would still be able to fight.

While you hack with your first commlink you tell your drone to upload an infinite number of agents to the enemy/opposing commlink/node to slow down THEIR response while you attack it. (this would probably work AFTER you have used exploit and found a backdoor into their system, after all, if they have a limited response and you flood their system with lots and lots of programs...)

Having the Drone using electronic warfare and jamming or even attacking any wireless transmission within a certain radius not from your team.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 11 2005, 09:49 PM
Post #19


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



Pilot replaces System - so, once it is subverted, there is no more fight...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 10:44 PM
Post #20


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
Pilot replaces System - so, once it is subverted, there is no more fight...

nope, in this case it actually dont. The pilot program functions as a CONTROLLER for the commlink, it USES the system like any other hacker. An agent has a weakness of being part of the actual system and is dependant on it to run while a pilot program would function as hacker using a comlink and its pilot rating as its persona.

Subverting the system would be just as subverting the system of a hackers commlink, the hacker can always try to take it back.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 11 2005, 10:48 PM
Post #21


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



Actually, it is the other way round:

Agents are not linked to the System they run on - Pilots are the System (So an Agent that is hacked itself has the same problem).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 11:10 PM
Post #22


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



Would you please direct me to the place where it says that a pilot program becomes the OS of an electronic device or vehicle? It also states that a pilot programs rating functions like a characters attributes.

The only thing i can find is the information about pilots is autosoft programs and that states that just because a drone has something installed in itself (a weapon mount for example, or in this case a comlink used for hacking) does not mean it knows how to use it.

A pilot program isn't THE system, its an independent system used for controlling a device - like driving a car and is embedded in the Rigger adaption hardware. In the case of a comlink it would know how to USE a comlinks system, OS and associated programs, but it would not BE the system.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 11 2005, 11:23 PM
Post #23


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (The Jopp)
Would you please direct me to the place where it says that a pilot program becomes the OS of an electronic device or vehicle?

QUOTE (SR4 p. 213-214 Pilot Program)
Pilot programs represent a special type of OS—a system with specialized functions featuring semi-autonomous decision-making algorithms.
[...]
Pilot is used in place of System for vehicles, drones, and agents, but otherwise has the same function as System.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Nov 11 2005, 11:55 PM
Post #24


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
QUOTE (The Jopp)
Would you please direct me to the place where it says that a pilot program becomes the OS of an electronic device or vehicle?

QUOTE (SR4 p. 213-214 Pilot Program)
Pilot programs represent a special type of OS—a system with specialized functions featuring semi-autonomous decision-making algorithms.
[...]
Pilot is used in place of System for vehicles, drones, and agents, but otherwise has the same function as System.

Hmm...Annoying, so If I have a fairlight caliban with a maxed out novatech navi (5/5) would be reduced to a 4/4 due to the limit of the pilot program?

What I WANT to achive is not for a drone to BE the comlink but instead use the comlink like a hacker, very much like a rigger just driving a car instead of rigging it, is that feasible in any way?

Here's the odd part, with the reasoning of page 213-214 it would not replace a comlinks system if a comlink was installed inside a drone that was controlled by a pilot program since it would use it like an accessory instead of "being" the comlink.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Nov 12 2005, 09:45 AM
Post #25


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



System and Pilot both cap at 6 - only Skillsofts and Autosofts cap at 4.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 08:58 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.