IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Astral Perception and Targeting, Grasshopper Seeks Master of Search-Fu
Sicarius
post Nov 22 2005, 11:58 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 908
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Georgia
Member No.: 7,270



Here's what I understand about Astral perception. An astrally percieving character can percieve the astrally present (spirits, etc) as well as the physical (trash cans, people, buses, etc.)

So say (pretty common situation) a mage is facing an enemy hunkered down behind cover. Can he go to Astral perception and cast a mana spell through the barrier, at the target's Aura? What modifiers come into play for a situation like that?

this is a mega-n00b question, but i'm away from my books.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Nov 22 2005, 01:06 PM
Post #2


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



No because the trash can is probably opaque in the astral, most solid objects are. what you can do is go astral to avoid the penalties for shooting in the dark, although you still have +2 for taking a physical action while astraly preserving,

Smoke is a grey aria.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Apathy
post Nov 22 2005, 04:21 PM
Post #3


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



I thought anything that interupted/interfered with physical LOS also interupted/interfered with astral perception? In which case smoke would apply astral perception modifiers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Nov 25 2005, 04:04 PM
Post #4


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



There was one aspect of the visual modifiers which applied to astral vision. It wasn't range and I don't believe it was lighting, but I don't think it was smoke either... Man, that's tough.

Anyway, no, you can't use astral vision to see THROUGH solid things. You COULD use it to help spot hiding people (won't be any good against drones or people with full cover, but people who are just using camouflage and shadows will be easier to spot) and it could be used to overcome certain visual problems such as darkness when firing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Nov 26 2005, 12:40 AM
Post #5


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (nezumi)
Anyway, no, you can't use astral vision to see THROUGH solid things.

Unless it's a transparent solid thing, like a glass window.

However, if you're playing SR4, that nowhere in the book does it contain the disclaimer that things transparent on the physical are transparent on the astral, so some people say that this no longer counts under the SR4 rules. YMMV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Feshy
post Nov 26 2005, 12:52 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 715
Joined: 4-September 05
From: Metaplane GEPLK136 (The one with the lizards. You remember the lizards, don't you?)
Member No.: 7,684



QUOTE (RunnerPaul)
QUOTE (nezumi @ Nov 25 2005, 11:04 AM)
Anyway, no, you can't use astral vision to see THROUGH solid things.

Unless it's a transparent solid thing, like a glass window.

However, if you're playing SR4, that nowhere in the book does it contain the disclaimer that things transparent on the physical are transparent on the astral, so some people say that this no longer counts under the SR4 rules. YMMV.

Those people are silly. "Air" is a (generally speaking) transparent physical object. If it is opaque on the astral, "astral sight" is a lot like being blindfolded...

Though, given the "magic doesn't interact well with technology" aspect of shadowrun, I suppose I'd support an extremely processed transparent substance blocking astral sight. Like transparent aluminum. Or some nanite glass of some sort (or . . . *evil snicker* those uber contacts that are so popular in SR4...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Nov 29 2005, 04:29 PM
Post #7


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I think he meant transparent solids (which is a valid way of interpreting what he wrote). That's a house rule I made a long time ago since there's no logical way to justify being able to psychically 'see' through glass but not through rice paper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jrm549
post Nov 30 2005, 04:47 PM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-November 05
Member No.: 8,022



There is nothing in any of the books that I've seen that suggests that magic can be cast towards mundanes while perveiving astrally. You can however do mundane things, (such as fire a pistol) while perceiving astrally with a +2.

If anyone can suggest a page that proves the opposite, I would be really happy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Nov 30 2005, 05:25 PM
Post #9


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (jrm549)
There is nothing in any of the books that I've seen that suggests that magic can be cast towards mundanes while perveiving astrally. You can however do mundane things, (such as fire a pistol) while perceiving astrally with a +2.

If anyone can suggest a page that proves the opposite, I would be really happy.

Reread the section on magic. You cannot cast spells on mundane while astrally PROJECTING, but while astrally perceiving you are dual natured. You can do things as though you were astrally projecting AND physically there (although modifiers do exist for some actions).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sicarius
post Dec 1 2005, 12:30 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 908
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Georgia
Member No.: 7,270



So the consenus seems to be that while astral perceiving you can't target someone's Aura for a spell, when unable to see their physical person, because physical objects which are opaque in the physical are equally opaque on the astral?

So an astrally percieving character can't cast a manaball through a wall, at the target on the other side by targeting is aura.

Am I interpreting what folks are saying correctly?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Dec 1 2005, 03:50 PM
Post #11


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (Sicarius @ Dec 1 2005, 07:30 AM)
So the consenus seems to be that while astral perceiving you can't target someone's Aura for a spell, when unable to see their physical person, because physical objects which are opaque in the physical are equally opaque on the astral?

So an astrally percieving character can't cast a manaball through a wall, at the target on the other side by targeting is aura.

Am I interpreting what folks are saying correctly?

Err... Not quite following what you're saying in that first line, but the conclusion is correct. In general, an astrally perceiving person can NEVER cast a spell on a person's aura. Auras aren't people. That's like saying you're going to cast a spell on a person's skin. It's technically not correct. You cast a spell on a person, but perceive the person by his aura.

I'll give some examples. Albert the Mage is astrally perceiving. He wants to cast a spell on Bob the Target.

- If Al can see Bob normally (nothing blocking LOS, sufficient lighting, etc.) he can cast his spell regardless as to whether Al is astrally perceiving or not.

- If Al can NOT see Bob because Bob is completely behind a brick wall, Al cannot cast a spell, nor can Al see his aura, regardless as to whether Al is perceiving or not.

- If Al can NOT see Bob physically because of visibility modifiers (full darkness), Al can STILL see Bob astrally if Al is perceiving (assuming no full cover) and can cast his spell on Bob. This is the *ONLY* time Al will cast a spell 'on his aura', although as I said, it's technically incorrect (otherwise normal casting is cast 'on his reflected light').

- If Bob is partially obscured and hiding, Al can get a bonus at spotting him with astral perception

- If Bob is mundane and Al is astrally projecting (not perceiving), Al CANNOT DIRECTLY CAST SPELLS ON BOB! This is regardless as to whether he can see Bob or not.

Does this all make sense?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sicarius
post Dec 1 2005, 03:52 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 908
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Georgia
Member No.: 7,270



yes, thanks for all your help :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 05:30 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.