IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Tomorrow armor created, Tech breakthrough
Critias
post Dec 16 2005, 10:59 AM
Post #26


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
QUOTE (stevebugge @ Dec 15 2005, 01:43 PM)
How much does it cost?

Because a soldier's life isn't worth a hudred thousand dollars.

-Frank

Sure it is. That's why we spend so much to train 'em.

The question is -- is a soldier's armor worth $100,00?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Dec 16 2005, 11:15 AM
Post #27


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (hobgoblin)
unless this have to be form fitted for each soldier

Right now it's rigid, so while it wouldn't necessarily have to be form fitted, there would have to be at least a few dozen different sizes. Which basically means it'd be quite strictly personal gear.

As of 2004, the US Army was still going for flexible full body armor by 2020. Considering all the problems you run into with rigid full body armor, I seriously doubt such will be fielded in large numbers for a few decades yet. This particular material has not yet been shown to provide any real advantage over other types of flexible body armor -- nor has it even been shown to function properly as flexible body armor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vaevictis
post Dec 16 2005, 07:34 PM
Post #28


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 11-June 05
Member No.: 7,441



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Armor is useless if the soldier doesn't wear it and this is the kind of armor that soldiers won't wear, it uncreased the overall gear weight to intollerable levels. Howwould you like to march 20 miles through the desert wearing 300 pound and carrying 80 pounds of gear? Enough soldiers would simply leve their armor in their lockers as to render it much less effective overall.

Depends on what the probability of taking fire is, doesn't it? If you think it unlikely, you probably won't wear the armor. But if you already hear the gunshots, you probably would.

For stuff like patrols, recon, etc, where you don't anticipate taking fire, you'd probably leave this at home. For situations where you're planning on doing a direct assault on a fortified position, well, yeah, assuming that it could stop most of the fire you'd take and it doesn't turn you into a sitting duck for the fire it can't... well, you'd suffer the 300 lbs of weight, wouldn't you? :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Apathy
post Dec 16 2005, 07:50 PM
Post #29


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



Not that I could lug around 300# of armor, but if I was capable of doing so:
  • I'd be too slow to seek cover when it was needed, and
  • My chance of fatality through heat stroke would be greater than the chance of getting shot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Dec 16 2005, 07:58 PM
Post #30


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Guys. Stop looking at this technological breakthrough in terms of "how can this alone add to already established military technology."

Look at what other forms of military technology are coming down the pike, too. Like that exoskeletal humanoid movement enhancer.

Now think about that. We have things that can let a soldier go stomping around at full tilt for two hours without getting tired, while carrying a shitload of heavy gear. We have armor that looks to be impervious to just about everything short of high-explosives and APDS tank rounds.......

Come on people! This is not a hard leap of the imagination!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Dec 16 2005, 08:09 PM
Post #31


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



Pffft.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fix-it
post Dec 16 2005, 08:53 PM
Post #32


Creating a god with his own hands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,405
Joined: 30-September 02
From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
Member No.: 3,364



I think that's the shortest thing raygun has ever posted.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Dec 16 2005, 08:57 PM
Post #33


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



But it still speaks volumes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Dec 16 2005, 09:37 PM
Post #34


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (John Campbell)
QUOTE (tanka)
SCA use live steel and do beat on each other something harsh.  Crazy folk, them.

Rattan, actually. You can't play full speed unchoreographed with live steel... it results in casualty rates that are unacceptable in 21st century America.

We do have Romans, and Roman-era Celts and Germans and such... they're not all that common, but our official "pre-17th century Europe" scope technically has no starting date. Around these parts, we're so heavily Dark Ages that the joke is, if you have four digits in your year, you're late period.

-- Æðelwulf of Mountain Freehold (8th c. Saxon)

And you can still get hurt from that if the blow lands in a lightly or unarmoured area, believe me. Though at a Faire outside of KC I did see a tournament that was done with live steel (flat of the blade) and full-on Tilting. This was put on by the local college's Theatrical dept so they definitely were "well practised".

As to the "cultural" styles, most of the members I ran into were either Brit or Celtic. We had the odd Roman, a couple of Vikings (very fun at the bardic circle) and even a Samurai once, but the British Isles seemed to always be represented by the majority.

--"Crazy Ivan the Polish Madman" [Retired] (& that was long before Hunt for Red October)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Dec 16 2005, 10:46 PM
Post #35


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
Guys. Stop looking at this technological breakthrough in terms of "how can this alone add to already established military technology."

Look at what other forms of military technology are coming down the pike, too. Like that exoskeletal humanoid movement enhancer.

Now think about that. We have things that can let a soldier go stomping around at full tilt for two hours without getting tired, while carrying a shitload of heavy gear. We have armor that looks to be impervious to just about everything short of high-explosives and APDS tank rounds.......

Come on people! This is not a hard leap of the imagination!

like the energy requirements for fielding and army wasnt bad enough allready...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Weredigo
post Dec 17 2005, 12:04 AM
Post #36


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 28-January 05
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Member No.: 7,030



Although I'd allow this bit of trivia in the use of creating self repairing hardened armor, I don't think I'd let it get to the "bulletproof bug repellent" stage...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Supercilious
post Dec 20 2005, 12:55 AM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 7-December 04
Member No.: 6,873



On the subject of SCA liscences, I got one to play with my airsoft guns in a public park masquerading as Shadowrun.So Sci-Fi works if your municipallity is lax (or "openminded" enough).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrostyNSO
post Dec 20 2005, 01:07 AM
Post #38


Resident Legionnaire
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,136
Joined: 8-August 04
From: Usually Work
Member No.: 6,550



Wow.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Dec 20 2005, 06:29 PM
Post #39


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Weredigo)
Although I'd allow this bit of trivia in the use of creating self repairing hardened armor, I don't think I'd let it get to the "bulletproof bug repellent" stage...

Why would the armor be self-repairing?

Or, rather, what in the article said the material would be self-repairing? I didn't see anything about that property.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Weredigo
post Dec 21 2005, 11:36 AM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 28-January 05
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Member No.: 7,030



QUOTE
Why would the armor be self-repairing?
yer right, my bad, saw the word Nano and thought Nanotechnology was being used to full extent, i.e. molecule sized robots, which could theoretically be utilized in producing self repairing hardened armor. However now that I've at least scanned through the article more carefully and caught the jist I'm not sure if I like it and would want it in my game.

Correct me if I'm wrong but this stuff sounds like what one of my players wants, "Diamond Plated Armor",

:-?


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.Platinum
post Dec 21 2005, 11:45 AM
Post #41


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 751
Joined: 7-June 02
From: Hamilton.LTG.on.ca
Member No.: 2,853



What does this have to do with shadow run?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Weredigo
post Dec 21 2005, 12:02 PM
Post #42


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 28-January 05
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Member No.: 7,030



QUOTE
  What does this have to do with shadow run? 


In a more or less reality based role playing game set in the somewhat near/not too distant future Players and GM's both should have access to materials, equipment, and scientific advances which are available in our modern world. So whenever something new like this comes along we all should take a look into it, get an idea of it's edges and flaws. Also we should at least bring it to the attention of our respective gaming groups, hash out a conversion for it, run it through some simulations, then comes to voting of keeping/calming/tossing...

I'm no einstein, but I love science, so feel free to email any scientific breakthroughs my way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.Platinum
post Dec 21 2005, 12:06 PM
Post #43


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 751
Joined: 7-June 02
From: Hamilton.LTG.on.ca
Member No.: 2,853



I'm just a Cannon kind of GM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Dec 21 2005, 01:59 PM
Post #44


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Weredigo)
yer right, my bad, saw the word Nano and thought Nanotechnology was being used to full extent, i.e. molecule sized robots, which could theoretically be utilized in producing self repairing hardened armor. 

In fact, no real world application of nanotechnology involves microscopic robots. Nanotechnology as it currently exists just involves nanoscale control of material properties. For example, heat treating can adjust the grain (crystal) size of some steel alloys to nanometer-scales for unique hardness and strength properties. Also, I believe a number of common products (like blue LEDs) require nanoscale precision in setting up their different semiconductor layers. (And that's achieved with vapor deposition, not microscopic robots.)

QUOTE
However now that I've at least scanned through the article more carefully and caught the jist I'm not sure if I like it and would want it in my game. 


It would be easy enough to say something like, "Yeah, this nanostructured material was popular in the 2020s for armor, but it's as obsolete and ineffective as kevlar in the 2060s."

QUOTE
Correct me if I'm wrong but this stuff sounds like what one of my players wants, "Diamond Plated Armor",


This material would probably survive the Dikoting process, if that's what you mean. Dikoting doesn't do that much for armor - just +1/+1 in SR3 and SR2. That shouldn't be a game breaker.

QUOTE
I'm just a Cannon kind of GM.


(Cannon? You like big guns? :) )

Canon doesn't get into armor materials with great detail. It wouldn't hurt to cite this nanomaterial as a typical hard armor material of the 2060s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Weredigo
post Dec 23 2005, 12:10 AM
Post #45


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 28-January 05
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Member No.: 7,030



My votes with Cray.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd November 2025 - 12:16 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.