IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SIN Scanners: Ratings?, Can't find anything in the main book...
Gyro the Greek S...
post Jan 26 2006, 04:49 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 18-August 03
From: North VA
Member No.: 5,519



Hey folks, I did a quick search and didn't see if this was addressed, so...

When doing the opposed test against a runner's fake SIN, what is the average rating of the scanner? Fake SINs only go up to 3 at character creation it would appear, so would your average store scanner be a 1, and then progressively go up from there?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 26 2006, 05:04 AM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



Errata 1.3 changed the Fake SIN Availability to (Rating x 3)F, which allows Rating 4.


My GM used the Rating as a Threshhold and gave Lone Star 12 dice to try detect it. They didn't detect the Rating 6 SIN. *whew* But they did roll 4 hits, and 5 or 6 hits is quite possible. Not sure what he would have done in a tie, maybe further questioning so requiring a Con Opposed Test. Just work it from there using that as a Benchmark allocating dice, and just call it Data Search dice and Scanner Rating dice.

That felt about right. Because you can't used Edge dice anyway with your Fake SIN, and that's a lot less random.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkness
post Jan 26 2006, 01:33 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 248



QUOTE (Brahm)
Because you can't used Edge dice anyway with your Fake SIN, and that's a lot less random.

Mmmh. Can't remember seeing something like this. It'n nowhere clearly stated that Edge can't be used in such a test, AFAIK. Edge is, well luck. May i ask, where you got your impression from?

@Gyro the Greek Sandwich Pirate:
We use the normal Device Ratings Table on Page 214 to determine the Rating of a scanner. We interpret a Rating 3 with a simple handheld device as carried by a street cop and a Rating 6 with an in depth scan (only applicable in places like Lone Star facilities, where you'r SIN will be scanned deeply if you got caught). Other Systems may vary, but with us they don't drop below 2 in stores and such.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MrMiracle
post Jan 26 2006, 02:55 PM
Post #4


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 15-January 06
Member No.: 8,164



0 - stuffer shack, cheap clothing store, fast food joint (they don't even require you to sign credit slips these days)
1 - fasionable clothing store, sit down restaurant.
2 - Electronics store, fancy restaurant.
3 - used car dealership, high end electronics, gun store.
4 - new car dealership
5 - Hospital
6 - Police, airport security
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lurker69
post Jan 26 2006, 05:48 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 19-December 05
Member No.: 8,082



Have anyone seen house rules for equipment ratings over the listed Maximum?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mdynna
post Jan 26 2006, 06:23 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Joined: 10-January 06
From: Regina
Member No.: 8,145



I thought the SIN check was an opposed test. Scanner Rating vs. Fake SIN rating. I also believe it does say in the book (somewhere) that a tie means "inconclusive" and the officer/guard will probably question further.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 26 2006, 07:35 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



QUOTE (Darkness @ Jan 26 2006, 08:33 AM)
QUOTE (Brahm @ Jan 26 2006, 06:04 AM)
Because you can't used Edge dice anyway with your Fake SIN, and that's a lot less random.

Mmmh. Can't remember seeing something like this. It'n nowhere clearly stated that Edge can't be used in such a test, AFAIK. Edge is, well luck. May i ask, where you got your impression from?

Just going by a general rule that if you aren't using your own dice you can't use Edge. Like when you from the Captian's Chair tell your drone to shoot a person the drone can't use your Edge.

QUOTE (mdynna)
I thought the SIN check was an opposed test. Scanner Rating vs. Fake SIN rating. I also believe it does say in the book (somewhere) that a tie means "inconclusive" and the officer/guard will probably question further.


Yes. But my GM handled it differently, and it worked well I think. Only one roll to make instead of two.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Jan 26 2006, 07:41 PM
Post #8


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



a tie between the tests does indeed mean further questioning, and he specifically indicated that the threshold part of that statement was his GM's ruling, not a game rule.

it does, however, happen to be a houserule that IMO should be official... since, as written, it is my opinion that fake SINs are too easily detected. you can have a rating 6 SIN and it's not all that unlikely for a rating 3 scanner to tie or even beat it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
milspec
post Jan 26 2006, 07:46 PM
Post #9


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 7,658



My group plays it the following way:

When checking someone's commlink ID, the book says to simple roll scanner vs ID. We are adding a second variable to that:

(scanner + commlink) vs (ID + commlink)

So a hacker has a lower chance of having his fake ID caught by a standard street cop. And a high-tech scanner has a better chance to crack an average ID.

Example: Cop with Rating 3 scanner and a Rating 2 Commlink (slightly below average) = 5 dice. A hacker with a Rating 5 SIN and a rating 5 Commlink = 10 dice. Chances are good the hacker will usually win, but randomness will occasionally make it interesting.

milspec
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 26 2006, 07:48 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



QUOTE (Jaid)
a tie between the tests does indeed mean further questioning, and he specifically indicated that the threshold part of that statement was his GM's ruling, not a game rule.

it does, however, happen to be a houserule that IMO should be official... since, as written, it is my opinion that fake SINs are too easily detected. you can have a rating 6 SIN and it's not all that unlikely for a rating 3 scanner to tie or even beat it.

Yes, thank you for explaining better. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gyro the Greek S...
post Jan 26 2006, 08:27 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 18-August 03
From: North VA
Member No.: 5,519



QUOTE (Brahm)
Errata 1.3 changed the Fake SIN Availability to (Rating x 3)F, which allows Rating 4.


My GM used the Rating as a Threshhold and gave Lone Star 12 dice to try detect it. They didn't detect the Rating 6 SIN. *whew* But they did roll 4 hits, and 5 or 6 hits is quite possible. Not sure what he would have done in a tie, maybe further questioning so requiring a Con Opposed Test. Just work it from there using that as a Benchmark allocating dice, and just call it Data Search dice and Scanner Rating dice.

That felt about right. Because you can't used Edge dice anyway with your Fake SIN, and that's a lot less random.

So what continuum would you give for this? How many dice are lower-rating establishments going to be rolling against that threshold?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 26 2006, 08:45 PM
Post #12


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



It is Eddie Furious. He posts here sometimes, so maybe he will give you his answer.

I hadn't thought about it much myself. I really like MrMiracle's list and then close to double dice for the likely Data Search skill the operator has. Depending on the situation.

In the one in our game the character with the Fake SIN was filing a police report about pirates off the coast of Seattle. Linked to an insurance claim that would have run into 6 digits. Story here. The boat was shot up really bad.

So that means not just a beat cop, who is going to have maybe Data Search 2 or 3 tops. Also a beat cop may carry around a slightly less than top of the line scanner. So that means a standard Lone Star officer that pulls over your car and has a reason to check your SIN closely because something sets them off will roll maybe 7 or 8 dice. Best case for a Fake SIN 1 there is that you will amuse the officer with your pitiful forgery. Fake SIN 3 should have you sweating a bit, expect to do some Fast Talking. Fake SIN 4 is fairly safe. Ratings above that should get you by with no problems unless you do something else that makes the officer suspicious enough to use Edge. Or it was your turn to bring beer for the GM and you forgot.

What is the Skill rating of someone working at a store counter? Likely only 1 if they have it at all. Once again depends on whether you did something that caused the shift manager to come out and do the check, or if you have annoyed the GM. 8)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Jan 26 2006, 09:09 PM
Post #13


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



All Identification Systems in SR4 main book have a Device Rating of 3 - so, the scanner would roll three dice...

When considering scanner ratings up to six, it is nearly inevitable to switch the opposed test to a threshold test, so a rating 6 ID is as bulletproof as it is described...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 26 2006, 09:38 PM
Post #14


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
All Identification Systems in SR4 main book have a Device Rating of 3 - so, the scanner would roll three dice...

:? Where are you getting this?

Getting by without a SIN can be a pain, so runners settle
for the next best thing—a fake. If it’s high quality, nobody will
ever recognize the diff erence. If it’s low quality, you’d better not
use it in high security settings. Th e rating of the fake SIN is
used in Opposed Tests against the ratings of any verifi cation
systems trying to discern its authenticity.


Having all scanners be rating 3, whether you are buying a bottle of soy juice or applying for house loan or registering your vehicle, seems to fly in the face of that.

QUOTE
When considering scanner ratings up to six, it is nearly inevitable to switch the opposed test to a threshold test, so a rating 6 ID is as bulletproof as it is described...


Yes, it is just another part of the rules that weren't fully codified and maybe not fully thought through. So there it is. Until Unwired an extension of the rules that works.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eddie Furious
post Jan 28 2006, 01:46 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Calgary Alberta, CANADA
Member No.: 7,519



QUOTE (Gyro the Greek Sandwich Pirate)
So what continuum would you give for this?  How many dice are lower-rating establishments going to be rolling against that threshold?

I decided that the way the SIN Scanners was set up didn't feel quite right to me. I put it in my mind that a top notch organization or one who specializes in identifying people would have a lot of dice in their ID/data search system, so 12 seemed right. It was the same number of dice I rolled for ARES when they did a credit check on the Dwarf when he got the speedboat for a test drive. From there I pretty much use a little common sense. A knucklehead C grade private dick might have four or five dice to ID with through his system. A fully supported Intelligence Organization with a few special forces operatives on thier roster would get a 14 or even 16 for the really accomplished ones. But then we are talking about legwork and checking the SIN holder's "legend" which is not an on the spot kind of thing.

A Special Forces Op turned Runner turned Fixer might have saaaay 10 dice or so... at first.
:vegm:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Jan 28 2006, 04:30 AM
Post #16


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



QUOTE (Brahm)
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Jan 26 2006, 04:09 PM)
All Identification Systems in SR4 main book have a Device Rating of 3 - so, the scanner would roll three dice...

:? Where are you getting this?

P. 206 "For simplicity, however, most devices in SR4 are given a standard
Device rating that bundles all of these attributes together.
Th ese attributes are detailed under Matrix Attributes, p. 212."


P 213 "Th ere are far too many electronics in the world of
Shadowrun for a gamemaster to keep track of their individual
Matrix attributes. Instead, each device is simply given a Device
rating. Unless it has been customized or changed in some way,
assume that each of the Matrix attributes listed above for a particular
device equals its Device rating.
If a particular device plays an important role in an adventure,
the gamemaster should assign a full complement of
Matrix attributes to it. If the item only plays a passing role, then
a simple Device rating will suffi ce.
Th e Sample Devices table (p. 214) lists typical Device ratings
for common electronics."


P 214 "Average (Rating) 3 Standard personal electronics, headware, vehicles,
drones, home/business terminals"


Business Terminal is probably used to check ID when you shop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Jan 28 2006, 09:20 AM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



QUOTE (DireRadiant @ Jan 27 2006, 11:30 PM)
QUOTE (Brahm)
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Jan 26 2006, 04:09 PM)
All Identification Systems in SR4 main book have a Device Rating of 3 - so, the scanner would roll three dice...

:? Where are you getting this?

P. 206 "For simplicity, however, most devices in SR4 are given a standard
Device rating that bundles all of these attributes together.
Th ese attributes are detailed under Matrix Attributes, p. 212."


P 213 "Th ere are far too many electronics in the world of
Shadowrun for a gamemaster to keep track of their individual
Matrix attributes. Instead, each device is simply given a Device
rating. Unless it has been customized or changed in some way,
assume that each of the Matrix attributes listed above for a particular
device equals its Device rating.
If a particular device plays an important role in an adventure,
the gamemaster should assign a full complement of
Matrix attributes to it. If the item only plays a passing role, then
a simple Device rating will suffi ce.
Th e Sample Devices table (p. 214) lists typical Device ratings
for common electronics."


P 214 "Average (Rating) 3 Standard personal electronics, headware, vehicles,
drones, home/business terminals"


Business Terminal is probably used to check ID when you shop.

That is not the rating as a scanner. That is just a guideline for assigning a System, Firewall, Response, and Signal to some device that otherwise was not given details. Like your cybereye or a businessmans PDA. Or the scanner as well, but not as the rating of it's primary function. Just for details on breaking into it via wireless, although if you try that an alert GM is likely going to instead say it is a security device or even bump it up past that to make it harder to get into.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 03:36 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.