Why remove the Karma/Build cost for Physads?, Just wondering... |
Why remove the Karma/Build cost for Physads?, Just wondering... |
Feb 24 2006, 05:48 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
One of the things that I liked about the old SR3 'build system' was the idea (IIRC, so don't shoot me if I'm not!) that you could build extra power points for Physads. Now, I'm aware of the balance issues between physads and samurai, i.e. physads can continue to gain 'power' while a samurai has a limited amount of Essence (more so now they've got rid of Body Index, if that's not just an SR2 thing), but I'm not overtly fond of the idea that Physads must specialise. After all, there is a fine line between 'specialise' and 'munkinise', i.e. loading up as much as possible on single abilities.
This has, of course, been an issue for some time exception the SR3 build system. Perhaps appropriately so, but my knee-jerk reaction is to allow for non-specialised physads that don't have to be necessarily tooled up through the use of Initiation. Okay, perhaps just another 'newbie/noob' comment, but just thought whether I'm inherently being a munchkin/power player without necessarily realising it. Thank you for your time. Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 05:51 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
The 20 karma per PP rule was a patchwork abomination that FASA/Fanpro explicitly said you shouldn't be using as soon as your game started using Initiation in MitS.
|
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 05:54 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
Seconded. 20 karma/PP was just to "get you by" until you could get the proper initiation rules.
Life would be better for all if they'd just not mentioned it. I used to use both together. That was wrong of me. :-( |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 05:57 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,026 Joined: 23-November 05 From: Seattle (Really!) Member No.: 7,996 |
It appears that the rule was included as a stopgap measure while the advanced magic rules were in development. Judging by the responses in the FAQ's I rather suspect that they greatly regretted ever including it. I had a huge problem with one of my players trying to start using this rule after initiating a few times (once the next grade of intiation cost more than 20 Karma) in SR3.
Chances are there are going to be a few of these rules missteps in SR4 too, anyone got some candidates? |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 06:02 PM
Post
#5
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
Poisons are now so very, very nasty. I think they really missed this one. Only way I see to fix this besides rewriting core rules is to include new have-to-have equipment, implants, or Qualities in future books. I guess maybe you could add the rule that to weaponize a poison into a projectile or squirt gun you effectively halve the DV? Afterall they give the DV without giving the dose, which just isn't how toxins work. |
||
|
|||
Feb 24 2006, 06:11 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
Fair enough. It is obvious that it can be susceptible to 'munchkins', yet it seems to be the traditional D&D balance between wizards and warriors, just slightly repackaged. You can be a powerful samurai/warrior (depending on the nature of the campaign) or you can be this middling physad who has the potential to become something more... at a price. Yet the balance of the cost of physad powers, despite the lack (?) of capping on some of them, seems overtly expensive...
I honestly can see the narrative advantages of initiation, even if I'm confused as to the comment about a stop-gap measure, though that's probably because I can only remember the karma-power point rule from SR3, while the developed initiation rules can be seen in SR2 and beyond. Anyway, that's probably just me so apologies. Despite all that, the 'weakness' of physads relative to other types of adepts seems... I don't know, a bit obvious? Regards and thank you for your patience. It seems that I need convincing more than anything else. Not over the relative merits of one edition of the SR mechanics over another, but the initial low power of physads, despite the fact of upward mobility in terms of initiation. Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 06:17 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
As for the stop-gap thing, when SR3 came out there were no initiation rules. Magicians could still get "better" by learning new spells, but Adepts had no way of improving their powers out of chargen. So they introduced the 20kp/PP rule to allow them to advance.
When MitS came out, the Initiation rules replaced the 20kp/PP rule. |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 06:24 PM
Post
#8
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,651 Joined: 23-September 05 From: Marietta, GA Member No.: 7,773 |
FWIW, there are only two types of adepts in SR4: "normal" adepts (previously known as "physical adepts") and mystic adepts. Arguably, mystic adepts are the weakest out of the two as they have the old multiclassing woes that most D&D players can sympathize with. However, a carefully constructed mystic adept can still be very effective as long as they massively specialize their magical talents. Examples that I can think of offhand: Cast Combat Sense to stack it with the adept power of the same name. Cast Increase Reflexes into a focus rather than allocating adept points to it. Use the adept Magic Resistence power in conjunction with the Counterspelling skill. Use spell-based armor to overlap the Mystic Armor power. Cast Invisibility while under a spirit's Concealment and using Improved Ability: Infiltration. Anyway, mystic adepts who think they can do well by being a "generalist" will typically find themselves just sucking at multiple things simultaneously. That's completely fine if your campaign is going to be extremely low-powered. However, if you're a part of a cohesive team your teammates are probably looking for something of a specialist to turn to when your field of expertise comes up. That's your D&D "class system" mechanic all over again. |
||
|
|||
Feb 24 2006, 06:26 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
Ah, that explains things. Thank you. I have a tendency of just carrying over older rules set into new editions rather than waiting for a given company to provide 'all the answers'.
Azralon... Indeed, Magical Adepts (cross-over spellcasters and physads, so apologies for any ancient terminology) do shade over into the generalisation more so than Physads. My main concern is the requirement for specialisation seen in Physads. Ack, I don't know. Your reference to the 'power' of the campaign is a part of it, I think. My initial impression is that Physads require initiation to even up the 'power' differentiation, i.e. similar to requiring extra build points to start off with and allowing, for them, initiation with disadvantages. That, though, is a significant advantage in and of itself so... Again, ack! Once again, thanks for all your input. Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 06:30 PM
Post
#10
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,138 Joined: 10-June 03 From: Tennessee Member No.: 4,706 |
Poisons are nasty, but they were always nasty. The core book version of toxins in SR3 was far deadlier than the version you find in SR4, what with "immediate" actually meaning "right then" instead of "at the end of the combat turn" like it does in M&M and SR4. M&M did give you half impact armor on drugs, further weakening them. EDIT: The half impact armor in M&M was probably only for poisons applied via melee weapon. In SR4, you get your full impact armor against those. |
||
|
|||
Feb 24 2006, 06:34 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
Yeesh... That reminds me of how much I have to re-learn about the SR4 system and its comparison to the SR3 one and, even worse, SR2... ;)
Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 06:34 PM
Post
#12
|
|||||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
I think that is the part of it, that Impact armor doesn't help with SR4. But the other part is that with SR4 it is typically a lot tougher to stage down to nothing. In SR3 you either were able to stage down and did so fairly effectively, or you weren't. There wasn't as much middle ground. The poisons do really well in the middle ground though, and the counters to them aren't sized big enough to provide a effective countermeasure under SR4 mechanics. |
||||
|
|||||
Feb 24 2006, 06:37 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
Which is a good thing, in my mind. Again, regardless of editions one of the things that I disliked about SR in general was the fact that combat while it could be horrendous at times, the idea that you could 'power down' the effects of guns, etc., was not something that sat well with me. I like viciousness.
So I presume other than GM dictation there are no solutions to my 'little problem'? Regards... Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 06:51 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 834 Joined: 30-June 03 Member No.: 4,832 |
Ka_ge, You could remove soak rolls from the game, if you don't dodge the bullet you eat lead at full power. I think that would increase the viciousness quite a bit :)
|
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 07:18 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
A reasonable point. Although to be fair, I'm overtly enamoured with perhaps the romantic image of the "Physad" at the moment. I like the idea of samurai-analog adepts rather than someone that must inherently focus on a given concept unless they wish to continue through 9th level Initiates...
Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 24 2006, 07:43 PM
Post
#16
|
|||
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
They were more evil in SR3 - you took damage until you got an antidote or got base damage +1 ... |
||
|
|||
Feb 24 2006, 07:50 PM
Post
#17
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,138 Joined: 10-June 03 From: Tennessee Member No.: 4,706 |
Adepts have always been the "one aspect" character. You can build a pretty well rounded combat physad, however, by utilizing boost attribute and other general purpose powers or you can focus in on and nail one aspect of combat, etc. Pretty much the way it's always been. |
||
|
|||
Feb 24 2006, 11:33 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 13-February 06 From: Teesprawl (originally); CAS (now) Member No.: 8,264 |
Indeed. Perhaps it is the fact that they were never analagous to Samurai. The fact that I can accept the upward-mobility of Physads due to Initiation just makes me feel more like the munchkin! ;)
Ka_ge |
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 12:34 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
i never found the 20-karma power point thing to be all that unbalanced. 20 karma is more than you'd pay for initiation up to about grade 6 or 8, unless you're not grouped and aren't taking any ordeals.
|
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 03:07 AM
Post
#20
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
The big thing was groups and ordeals, which tended to vary from GM to GM how strict they were. With SR4 the cost of gaining PP has gone up quite a bit. You pay 18 karma for just the 6th one, and that is before you have to start Initiating. So 20 karma just wouldn't make sense. Also every PP past the 6th one costs 6 more karma than the last, so picking an amount of karma for a flat cost is a little tougher. Hopefully Street Magic will include some Metamagic that Adepts can use. |
||
|
|||
Feb 25 2006, 03:29 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
I don't feel that even starting adepts are that underpowered. Keep in mind that the limit to starting resources requires sammies to make a lot of hard choices, too.
Actually, adepts have it pretty good. Combat sense and mystic armor are beefed up, they can start with 4 initiative passes (sammies being limited to 3 unless they use combat drugs), and they have killing hands or weapon foci to make them far more effective against spirits than sammies. Smartlinks, the former big sammie advantage, are now available in equally effective non-cyber versions. And with improved ability limited, and initiative passes more important in melee, adepts are also much more of a generalist class than they were before. I don't mind initiation being the means for adepts to improve (after all, sammies have to deal with surgery and the accompanying exorbitant costs to "upgrade"). I wish they had more metamagics that were geared towards adepts, though. They didn't have many useful choices in SR3, and they have even less in SR4. As far as the 20-Karma rule, it would be more expensive until Grade: 3 in SR4 (which doesn't have discounts for groups or ordeals... at least not yet). After that, it would be increasingly cheaper compared to initiation. My biggest problem with it was that it was a flat cost, unlike nearly any other Karma improvement costs, which go up as the ability to increase goes up. The 20-Karma rule is like improving pistols: 5 to pistols: 6 costing the same as improving pistols: 1 to pistols: 2. |
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 05:28 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
it's worth pointing out that in SR4, the smartlink is no longer the must-have cyber it once was, at least not for adepts. the ability to drop a clip and change fire mode as a free action is the biggest advantage a smartlink offers--the measly +2 dice is just a bonus.
|
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 05:49 AM
Post
#23
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
That +2 dice isn't so measly when you are fighting in crappy conditions, attempting a difficult shot, are having a hard time hitting a tweaked out turtler that is using Full Defense, or you are trying to get that last +1 DV to penetrate hardened armor. But yup for the elite shooter that is likely to hit their target and kill it anyway, that extra +2 dice doesn't amount to much at all. Similar in some ways but not the exact same situations as in SR3 when you already had the TN down to 2 before the Smartlink, only there it really was entirely limited to dropping a clip or fire mode changes. Or you are using an Airburst capable weapon, or using the poking your hand around the corner technique. |
||
|
|||
Feb 25 2006, 05:52 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
the bonus isn't nearly as large. +2 dice is almost never better than -2 TN. yes, +2 dice is a bonus, and it's not something you'd want to turn down, but statistically speaking, lowering the TN is better than any reasonable number of bonus dice just about every time. believe me, i spent about two weeks going over a very similar problem.
|
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 05:54 AM
Post
#25
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
Usually less, but calling it measly is a very poor characterization. |
||
|
|||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:12 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.