IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Keeping Your Cherry Blossom Storm Quiet.., Can the Sakura Fubuki be silenced?
Feyd-47
post Mar 3 2006, 03:35 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 3-March 06
From: Loughborough, UK
Member No.: 8,330



*Posted this in the main Shadowrun area, got told it would probably do better here, so, here we go.*

OK, a newby friend of my GM's has recently built a character (we've only just got rid of the crane ) that carries two Sakura Fubuki pistols, of which both are silenced. Now, my GM has, quite rightly, asked him to buy four suppressors per pistol for it to be silenced.

This is fine from a purely games rule perspective, as no where have i seen that the Sakura Fubuki pistol cannot have barrel mounts of any kind, but i have to ask, does anyone else find this slightly unrealistic?

It does, i suppose, depend on how the gun works. Personally i assume it runs off todays Metal Storm technology and that it works by firing one round from each barrel sequentially, thus giving it such a high rate of fire with as little recoil as it suffers from. My two major questions about this are thus:

1) Does each barrel, being close together, have enough space to accomodate a silencer/suppressor without fouling the muzzle of it's adjacent barrels?

2) if this four barrelled beast fires the way i've described and can fit the necessary silencing device to it, surely, because each barrel only deals with one bullet at a time, only a silencer is necessary, not a much bigger, therefore more prone to adjacent muzzle fouling, suppressor?

It's an interesting quandry that i'm unsure was considered when the weapon was introduced into SR4. Personally, i don't believe that you should be able to fit a silencer/suppressor to the weapon as i'm sure that it would foul adjacent muzzles, not to mention, with the weapon being a breach-loader, it would make the already cumbersome job of reloading a nightmare in a combat situation.

Your thoughts please, ladies and gentlemen?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brahm
post Mar 3 2006, 03:36 PM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,635
Joined: 27-November 05
Member No.: 8,006



Use the Search function to look for "Fubuki". All that and much, much more has been discussed in length.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 3 2006, 05:31 PM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



In brief:

Each muzzle also serves as a clip of sorts, so reloading would also require migrating a silencer from one muzzle to the new loaded one. Either that or each of your preloaded muzzles would be carried with their own dedicated silencer, which has its own obvious concealment/misalignment problems.

So, could it be done? Probably. It'd be damn inconvenient at the least.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dissonance
post Mar 3 2006, 06:01 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 515
Joined: 19-January 04
Member No.: 5,992



I imagine the cheapest and most feasable way to silence such a weapon would be to use that spell, Silence, if it's still in the game.

Barring that, switch to the AVS.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neko128
post Mar 3 2006, 06:43 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 327
Joined: 28-January 06
Member No.: 8,209



QUOTE (Dissonance)
I imagine the cheapest and most feasable way to silence such a weapon would be to use that spell, Silence, if it's still in the game.

Barring that, switch to the AVS.

It is. Hush: Mana, LOS(A), Sustained, (F/2)+2 drain; and Silence, physical, LOS(A), Sustained, (F/2)+3 drain.

Drop a medium-level silence over your team...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lagomorph
post Mar 3 2006, 06:53 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 834
Joined: 30-June 03
Member No.: 4,832



QUOTE (neko128)
QUOTE (Dissonance @ Mar 3 2006, 01:01 PM)
I imagine the cheapest and most feasable way to silence such a weapon would be to use that spell, Silence, if it's still in the game.

Barring that, switch to the AVS.

It is. Hush: Mana, LOS(A), Sustained, (F/2)+2 drain; and Silence, physical, LOS(A), Sustained, (F/2)+3 drain.

Drop a medium-level silence over your team...

Don't forget about the stealth spell too. Which may also keep the gun quiet, depending on your interpretation of the rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neko128
post Mar 3 2006, 06:56 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 327
Joined: 28-January 06
Member No.: 8,209



QUOTE (Lagomorph)
QUOTE (neko128 @ Mar 3 2006, 06:43 PM)
QUOTE (Dissonance @ Mar 3 2006, 01:01 PM)
I imagine the cheapest and most feasable way to silence such a weapon would be to use that spell, Silence, if it's still in the game.

Barring that, switch to the AVS.

It is. Hush: Mana, LOS(A), Sustained, (F/2)+2 drain; and Silence, physical, LOS(A), Sustained, (F/2)+3 drain.

Drop a medium-level silence over your team...

Don't forget about the stealth spell too. Which may also keep the gun quiet, depending on your interpretation of the rules.

Indeed, but Hush/Silence seemed more applicable at the time in my mind. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 3 2006, 07:34 PM
Post #8


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



hmm, would be interesting if you could quicken a non-area silence spell on the gun :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Akimbo
post Mar 3 2006, 08:24 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 14-October 05
Member No.: 7,844



Honestly, there isn't a single person who uses the Sakura Fubuki in our games. We houseruled that it was a lot bigger concealability-wise than the book suggests. As a matter of fact, we almost never see anyone with automatic weapons on the sheer fact that it's still going to make a hell of a lot of noise suppressed.

I can easily see the weapon supporting a suppressor, but it really isn't going to do the user a whole lot of good. If you're looking for stealth, pick up a light or a holdout pistol.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnnycache
post Mar 3 2006, 09:26 PM
Post #10


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 20-May 05
Member No.: 7,405



Well if you made it bigger and less concealable, why would anybody take it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 3 2006, 09:31 PM
Post #11


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



hunting vampires in the z-zones...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnnycache
post Mar 5 2006, 12:57 AM
Post #12


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 20-May 05
Member No.: 7,405



man reading those old threads hurt my soul.

Thoughts:

Metalstorm type weapons, the barrel is manufactured with the ammo in it. You don't reload the barrels - you discard them. The trade off for this is no brass all over. I interpret the rules for reloading it to mean that you change

I don't think the weapon could be loaded with more then two different types of ammo without boning up the rate of fire of a single type.

Silencing: I just don't see how it would work with a regular silencer. Some kind of sci-fi one not availible, maybe.

Recoil: The thing has one point inhearent and a stock if you're in deep - isn't tha enough?

Balance: It's no more powerful then a heavy pistol. I'd let somebody take it.

ex-ex and gel rounds: I would say overpowered and nonlethal ammo could be made for the gun, even if they didn't perfectly correspond to the equivilent ammo for other guns.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Akimbo
post Mar 5 2006, 01:21 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 14-October 05
Member No.: 7,844



QUOTE (Johnnycache)
Well if you made it bigger and less concealable, why would anybody take it?

They wouldn't. The gun is highly impractical and of poor design.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnnycache
post Mar 5 2006, 01:30 AM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 20-May 05
Member No.: 7,405



QUOTE (Akimbo)
QUOTE (Johnnycache @ Mar 3 2006, 04:26 PM)
Well if you made it bigger and less concealable, why would anybody take it?

They wouldn't. The gun is highly impractical and of poor design.

I disagree. Guns just like it exist and will probably be quite practical by 2070, There is nothing intrensically wrong with the idea of such a weapon. You nerfed it because you don't like it, fine, but reality diagrees on the practicality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeitgeist
post Mar 5 2006, 02:03 AM
Post #15


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 18-October 05
Member No.: 7,855



The SF has no penalties for burst fire, raising it up to 7P, and if it's smartlinked, you can fire it again sans the SA recoil penalties. Combine that with the 40 ammo capacity, and it's damned appealing. The silencer issue is what's keeping me away from it, but my GM is considering having our gunmonkey work on putting together four silencers and rigging it up to a mount that folds onto the side of the gun. Concealability is always an issue with a gun the size of a large brick, so I'm pretty sure that a concilable holster, or even a quick-draw holster would be off limits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnnycache
post Mar 5 2006, 03:06 AM
Post #16


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 20-May 05
Member No.: 7,405



QUOTE (Zeitgeist)
The SF has no penalties for burst fire, raising it up to 7P, and if it's smartlinked, you can fire it again sans the SA recoil penalties. Combine that with the 40 ammo capacity, and it's damned appealing. The silencer issue is what's keeping me away from it, but my GM is considering having our gunmonkey work on putting together four silencers and rigging it up to a mount that folds onto the side of the gun. Concealability is always an issue with a gun the size of a large brick, so I'm pretty sure that a concilable holster, or even a quick-draw holster would be off limits.

If by 7p you mean 6, you're correct.

If by no penalties you mean it uses the recoil for a single shot not a burst, you're correct.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only effect a smartgun would have on action or recoil would be to offset the penalties a bit, right?

Also, the gun's a light pistol and should have the concealbility of such. It doesn't matter that it looks a little clunky in the pic - other factors are wrapped up in concealibility, like how noticible it is magnetically, electronically, and chemically, and such a sophisticated weapon would be more concealable than a pistol that size made using more stardard tech. It doesn't do any more damage then any other light machine pistol, and the extra actions to reload it make up for the extra ammo - it really only holds 13 shots if you are going to it for the burst damage. they just wanted it to sound cool.

The slivergun's way more 'broken' although I still don't mind it.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Mar 5 2006, 12:10 PM
Post #17


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Also, since the burst fire doesn't add to the DV until after you check armor, this thing's less likely to penetrate body armor than a heavy pistol. And it uses the (shorter) light pistol ranges.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Endgame50
post Mar 5 2006, 01:44 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 19-July 04
From: N 42° 43.799'. W 84° 27.901'
Member No.: 6,496



Not to mention the thing only has one net power over the predator if it bursts, but takes 4x as long to reload and has one less AP. When you take into account 3x the ammo usage, it becomes less of a big deal--standard ammo is cheap, but EX Explosive is 10 nuyen per round. It adds up pretty quickly when it does come up. (3 rounds/shot x ~6 shots / turn = ~ 180 nuyen / turn).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Akimbo
post Mar 5 2006, 06:01 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 14-October 05
Member No.: 7,844



QUOTE (Johnnycache @ Mar 4 2006, 08:30 PM)
I disagree. Guns just like it exist and will probably be quite practical by 2070, There is nothing intrensically wrong with the idea of such a weapon. You nerfed it because you don't like it, fine, but reality diagrees on the practicality.

The actual mechanics behind the gun are amazing. It's an incredibly neat concept for a weapon. It has a lot of power and practicality. However, the picture of the weapon suggests that the Sakura Fubuki is a fat pig. The four barrels with the folding stock make this weapon so incredibly large that you wouldn't be able to conceal this beast. In all honesty, I don't think a Shadowrunner would really take this thing primarily due to the sheer size of it.

Here is a link to a picture of the weapon. http://img515.imageshack.us/my.php?image=o...oinkoink7ki.jpg

You would have to double the size of that image to get about the right size to actually hold that weapon comfortably. Bigger than that even. The finger grooves would have to be something like 250% or 300% that size to really fit. The weapon is so absolutely huge, that I feel the design is terrible. Neat and powerful weapon, highly impractical.

In the end, it really isn't much more than a toy to play with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 5 2006, 07:07 PM
Post #20


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (Shrike30)
Also, since the burst fire doesn't add to the DV until after you check armor, this thing's less likely to penetrate body armor than a heavy pistol. And it uses the (shorter) light pistol ranges.

im guessing this is based on the latest errata as i have read other places that burst fire mods where added before armor was applyed (alltho older SR rules never have done so)...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 5 2006, 07:11 PM
Post #21


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (Akimbo)
In the end, it really isn't much more than a toy to play with.

err, never evaluate a roleplaying weapon based on image alone. most often the artist have just been told the bare concept of how the weapon works and then left alone to work on a image. more often then not you will end up with something thats not in anyway realisticly useable...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Endgame50
post Mar 5 2006, 10:44 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 19-July 04
From: N 42° 43.799'. W 84° 27.901'
Member No.: 6,496



QUOTE (hobgoblin)

im guessing this is based on the latest errata as i have read other places that burst fire mods where added before armor was applyed (alltho older SR rules never have done so)...

I don't know which printing it was added in (I believe I have second) but it's SR4 p143 under narrow bursts.

"Note that this DV modifier does not apply when comparing the DV to the armor rating."

Easy to overlook
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nick012000
post Mar 5 2006, 10:50 PM
Post #23


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,283
Joined: 17-May 05
Member No.: 7,398



Also, if you don't like the stock, just ask the GM if you can get a SR3-style Personalised Grip on yours instead. Same effect, rules wise. The only real change is the fluff of how it looks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 6 2006, 04:39 PM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



Any viable handgun with four barrels AND a folding stock is not going to be very concealable.

Still, the Fubuki is a lot of fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Mar 6 2006, 09:28 PM
Post #25


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



The gun doesn't have a slide or, hell, many moving parts at all. I'm sure that'd cut down on some of the thickness-related bulk. The design also makes it more paperback-book shaped than gun shaped. Put something like that in a shoulder holster or one of those funky inverted pancakes and you really shouldn't have much trouble. It's the inner-pants or crossdraw holsters that the funky shape screws with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th June 2025 - 11:52 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.