IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A thought experiment on weapon skills...
Ed_209a
post Oct 6 2003, 04:57 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 944
Joined: 19-February 03
Member No.: 4,128



I am thinking about how SR might work if you pared the firearm skills down to just 3-4 general skills.

Possibly they could be Handgun, Longarm, and Heavy. The skill to use would be determined not by the weapon, but how you are using the weapon...

For example, you have a SMG with retractible stock. With the stock retracted, firing from the hip, you use handgun skill. With the stock extended, firing from the shoulder, you use Longarm. If firing from a bipod or tripod, (god knows why, but go with me here.) you would use Heavy.

I would double the cost to purchase the skill at both chargen and in game, since each skill is broader.

Then I would borrow the mechanic of Centering skills to customize the use of the skills. They would share nothing besides the game mechanics with magical centering. These centering skills would be oriented towards situations you would use a weapon in, and would not be combinable.

some centering examples (lots of brainstorming here):

Sniper Helps with range penalties, movement at range, etc
CQB Not sure here, perhaps reaction bonuses at close range
Support stuff like autofire recoil.

Very much a work in progress here. Think it might be worth pursuing further? :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Oct 6 2003, 05:06 PM
Post #2


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



Yes if considered this before. My conclusion: although a more logical system could be done, why bother? Nothing wrong with the current one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 6 2003, 05:13 PM
Post #3


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



There was an explicit reason why they moved from the general "firearms" skill to seperate sub-skills.

It helps diversify the characters and more accurately reflects the premise that just because you can fire a handgun doesn't automatically mean you can operate assault rifles, LMGs and grenade launchers.

Now, if you want to get me started on a rant -- combining the Etiquette skill was a massive reduction in the role-playing aspects of the game.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Velocity
post Oct 6 2003, 05:19 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 26-July 03
From: Montréal, QC, Canada
Member No.: 5,029



QUOTE
Siege wrote:
Now, if you want to get me started on a rant -- combining the Etiquette skill was a massive reduction in the role-playing aspects of the game.

Ooh yeah, that burned me SO much! Maybe they were trying to streamline things, but as far as I'm concerned it's a fundamentally wrong-headed solution... :grr:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ed_209a
post Oct 6 2003, 05:26 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 944
Joined: 19-February 03
Member No.: 4,128



QUOTE
There was an explicit reason why they moved from the general "firearms" skill to seperate sub-skills.

It helps diversify the characters and more accurately reflects the premise that just because you can fire a handgun doesn't automatically mean you can operate assault rifles, LMGs and grenade launchers.


I agree with this 100%. I just feel it could have been diversified better.

I base this on personal experience. Most of my firearm experience is with rifles, shotguns (thanks, Dad), and assault rifles (thanks, Uncle Sam). I have never fired anything close to a SMG.

I have no doubts that I could take any SMG with a shoulder stock, and fire it much better than the current defaulting rules might suggest.

In my mind, my skill is not rifles-x, shotgun-x, and Assault Rifle-x, its "put a firearm to my shoulder, align the sights and fire"-x


It isn't really relavant, but I also agree with Siege about the ettiquette thing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 6 2003, 05:31 PM
Post #6


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Well, as the Grim Redeemer once said (typed) -- "I was talking about rules, not logic. Don't confuse the two." (paraphrased)

You might tweak the default rules for your game, but generally speaking it's not a massive enough fracture in the game to arouse much interest.

The rpg rules are an attempt to translate reality (as we know it -- sorry, watching "Matrix" and typing) into quantifiable numbers and dice rolls. They'll never be 100% perfect -- to which I can attest, having spent (wasted?) days of my life tweaking CP 2020 rules that ended up getting thrown away without ever having seen the light of day.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
krishcane
post Oct 6 2003, 05:36 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 430
Joined: 28-May 02
Member No.: 2,784



I think long arms are pretty much identical at short range. You might see some differences out past 25 m., however, because the bullets have different speeds (affecting the drop-per-horizontal-distance), different weights (affecting how much wind affects them), and different shapes (affecting tumble and how much they drift off target). For example, if you check out the measurements of the movements of bullets over their whole range, some go into a tightening spiral and some go into a widening spiral.

The Uzi (SMG) uses 9 mm bullets, which get inaccurate relatively quickly. They slow way down and drift off target in a widening spiral. By contrast, 7.62 AR bullets are much quicker and tighten their spiral over most of their distance, staying very accurate until they slow down a lot. I think Raygun's site has all this data.

You could argue that this distinction is reflected in the range TNs for the different guns , but I would think you would also take it into account if you were very experienced with the weapons. Now, for indoor combat it really wouldn't matter, but SR doesn't make a range-based TN mod distinction. I suppose you could say at short range, it's just LongRifle skill, and at long range it breaks out into various skills, and at extreme range the skills go by make&model... snipers get adjusted to the quirks of a particular model of weapon.

--K
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
El_Machinae
post Oct 8 2003, 03:56 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 305
Joined: 2-March 03
Member No.: 4,188



Howzabout you don't let them default to their rifle skill unless they're shooting from the shoulder? Or, howabout they can't default to their pistol skill unless they're extending their arm to fire the SMG?

The +2 difficulty is easily reduced to a +1 by spending a simple action aiming. That means, with care, it's not THAT tough to default a weapon you're not used to.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 06:08 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.