Pistols and Gas Vents...., So, do you allow it or not? |
Pistols and Gas Vents...., So, do you allow it or not? |
Mar 13 2006, 04:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 10-September 05 From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America Member No.: 7,727 |
I know this topic has already been discussed but I can't make up my mind!
So, do you or don't you? Cheers, Max |
|
|
Mar 13 2006, 04:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 10-September 05 From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America Member No.: 7,727 |
Oops! It came out a little weird. :(
Does anyone know what happened? :( How can I edit the poll's choices? Cheers, Max |
|
|
Mar 13 2006, 07:33 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,754 Joined: 9-July 04 From: Modesto, CA Member No.: 6,465 |
My feeling is pistols are only SA, so you're really only looking to remove the "2nd shot" penalties. Not a game break for my group, cause you're concealability goes up.
I make it a role-playing issue since most places don't allow firearms. |
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 12:24 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,556 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 98 |
Most people coming from earlier editions will be inclined to ignore the description of gas vents in favor of remembering how they've worked since 2nd Ed, but the SR4 RAW only says they can be mounted on machine pistols, submachineguns, assault rifles and machineguns.
|
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 01:17 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,138 Joined: 10-June 03 From: Tennessee Member No.: 4,706 |
In a normal game, I just allow a PC to add an underbarrel weight or custom grips for a small fee. Recoil on pistols never meant much in SR3, and I'm inclined to let that tradition continue.
|
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 01:57 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 10-September 05 From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America Member No.: 7,727 |
I agree with you. (TinkerGnome)
I also wanted to know how everybody felt about this issue. I like making informed choices. There is the Ares Viper Slivergun, as well... Cheers, Max |
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 09:23 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 83 Joined: 20-May 05 Member No.: 7,405 |
I guess the idea of doing it, under SR rules, just seems pointless...I would allow it, I guess, if they didn't want to take one of the other recoil options and insited it was "gas venting"
I mean, oh well. But they'd be being dumb. |
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 06:21 PM
Post
#8
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,754 Joined: 9-July 04 From: Modesto, CA Member No.: 6,465 |
Meh. It's the 301-302 reference that makes me think there is something wrong (either way) about what can and can't mount gas-venting. |
||
|
|||
Mar 14 2006, 07:59 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,556 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 98 |
Which reference is this?
Shotguns have a barrel mount, and there's even an autofire-capable shotgun this time around, but they're not on the list of things that can get gas vents, either. |
|
|
Mar 14 2006, 10:23 PM
Post
#10
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 4-September 05 From: Metaplane GEPLK136 (The one with the lizards. You remember the lizards, don't you?) Member No.: 7,684 |
Slivergun has a built in sound suppressor, which takes up the barrel mount. That precludes the use of a barrel-mounted gas vent system. |
||
|
|||
Mar 15 2006, 12:55 AM
Post
#11
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,754 Joined: 9-July 04 From: Modesto, CA Member No.: 6,465 |
I am in denile, leave me alone. :P |
||
|
|||
Mar 15 2006, 01:16 AM
Post
#12
|
|||||
Midnight Toker Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
In SR4 integral accessories don't take up mounts. |
||||
|
|||||
Mar 15 2006, 01:33 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,589 Joined: 28-November 05 Member No.: 8,019 |
It shouldn't be brought in. You see, in the grim darkness of the near future, there is only corporate war. It is a dark age for the corporatocracy of man, and much of the old technology has been lost to legend. Or recovered and brought back 50 times as advanced as before. :S
|
|
|
Mar 15 2006, 06:20 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
bur
|
|
|
Mar 15 2006, 06:30 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,556 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 98 |
:rotfl:
|
|
|
Mar 15 2006, 06:34 PM
Post
#16
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,754 Joined: 9-July 04 From: Modesto, CA Member No.: 6,465 |
Long as you hear this and not the real thing. ;) |
||
|
|||
Mar 15 2006, 11:42 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 834 Joined: 30-June 03 Member No.: 4,832 |
I don't see it having much effect on pistols either way so let them have it, besides since real SA guns have it, why not let pretend ones have it? I know Austere Emancipator linked a Glock C (C is for compensated) in one of the previous threads that I'm too lazy to look up, so yeah, not a big deal.
Now putting one on a shotgun on the other hand... |
|
|
Mar 15 2006, 11:50 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 475 Joined: 13-March 06 From: dusty Mexican borderlands Member No.: 8,372 |
I voted yes, but not for the reasons specified. I could care less what the book says, really. It makes sense, it's physically possible here in the really-real world, and frankly, it's not a game breaker. I'd at least allow it on a trial basis. It doesn't matter much, it makes the player happy, and I can always find a way to trick the player into losing them if it causes problems.
In a perfect world that I don't live in, maybe I could even talk to the player about the problem, if one arises, and the player would agree to ditch the guns. |
|
|
Mar 24 2006, 02:28 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 1-February 06 Member No.: 8,219 |
My Mossberg 835 came with a ported over bored turkey barrel would that qualify as a gas vent?
Like as if Samurai_Jake III shadowrunner in 206? picked it out of his granddads footlocker in the attic would it have to be houseruled? |
|
|
Mar 25 2006, 01:18 AM
Post
#20
|
|||
Mostly Harmless Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 937 Joined: 26-February 02 From: 44.662,-63.469 Member No.: 176 |
I would say that it does. Gas Vents ought to be available as both built-in (non-removable) and barrel-mounted (removable). I would (and do) just ignore the "gas vents can't be removed" wording. |
||
|
|||
Mar 25 2006, 04:47 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Validating Posts: 1,618 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Montevideo, Uruguay. Member No.: 3,992 |
Anyone has pics of an actual pistol gas vent?
|
|
|
Mar 25 2006, 05:01 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 10-March 06 Member No.: 8,355 |
Why would you need a gas vent for only a -1 modifer?
|
|
|
Mar 25 2006, 05:20 PM
Post
#23
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,635 Joined: 27-November 05 Member No.: 8,006 |
In action. http://www.glock.com/compensator.htm Why for only a -1 modifier? So you can squeeze off the second round per phase without the 1 die penalty I guess. |
||
|
|||
Mar 25 2006, 06:13 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 10-March 06 Member No.: 8,355 |
I know that but wouldn't it be lot easier to have something else to compensate for that -1 modifier? I mean its a barrel add on too so you can't add a silencer to it better off to put maybea stock or as previously suggested custom grip or underbarrel weight since those confer a 1 point of recoil compensation
|
|
|
Mar 26 2006, 08:29 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Mostly Harmless Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 937 Joined: 26-February 02 From: 44.662,-63.469 Member No.: 176 |
I believe underbarrel weights take up the underbarrel mount, so in that case, you're just trading one mount for another. There may be something useful you need to attach to that underbarrel mount (lights, lasers, etc...).
Custom grips giving a -1 recoil compensation effect is pretty rediculous, IMO. I understand that a custom grip allows a person to interface with the gun better (more comfortably), but as far as recoil compensation goes, that's going to make next to nil difference in all but possibly small calibers that recoil minimally anyway (like .22 LR). So there's the argument that this benefit shouldn't even exist. (But since it does, there's really no good argument against doing it that way.) Silencers should offer some recoil compensation benefits all by themselves. As they're designed to quickly alleviate pressure that causes both noise and recoil, they should affect both. The way I see it, "Silencers" offer -1 recoil compensation while "Sound Suppressers" offer -3 recoil compensation. Here's a few more pictures of pistols with "gas vents". Glock and Taurus (those holes under the front sight are "gas vents") are about the only two mass producers off the top of my head that offer (non-removable) compensators. Compensators are most often installed on open competition pistols. A company called Evolution Gun Works manufactures many different compensators for the 1911 which can be installed in one of three ways, two of which are semi-permanent (meaning the compensator can be removed, but not easily; it's intended to be installed and left on). Here's an example of an open competition 1911. Top row, third from the left is the best pic of the compensator. Here's another open gun. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 06:52 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.