Resolving SR4 issues, Instead of whining like little girls Options

[Geekkake]

There are plenty of threads complaining about aspects of SR4 they don't like. Awesome. Now let's fix them. Pick one of those problems, and offer a resolution. And for the love of God, try to refrain from "here's X problem, IT CAN'T BE FIXED". These are, of course, simply suggested house rules.

Longshot tests: The most valid complaint I've seen regarding Edge is that there comes a point where the runner simply cannot attempt what they want to attempt. Their dicepool is reduced to zero, and don't have enough Edge to overcome the Threshold for the task. This is not only bad on players, but seems to run contradictory to the entire purpose and nature of Edge.

Solution: Make the dice explode. There's still a huge chance of failure, but frankly, if the modifiers of a situation have reduced your pool to zero, you're staring at a task that, well, exceeds your skill. You have to rely on blind luck. But luck can do crazy things, and there should never be a situation that entirely precludes the possibility of success, no matter how remote. Exploding dice allows the players to still try anything, and simply makes the chances of success more unlikely the higher the Threshold gets.

Now you try.

[Azralon]

I do like the thread subtitle. :) But, to business:

Movement and variable initiative passes bother me in the way they interact. It's all very simple when everyone has 1 IP and can move X meters per Free/Simple Action.

However, when people get multiple IPs, movement breaks down in either simplicity or realism. If I can walk 10m as a Free Action and I have two IPs, should I be spending one Free per IP to move 5m? Do I spend the one Free on my first IP to move 10m, and then I can't move any more until the next round?

The method I've been using is that you look at whoever has the highest IPs, then you divide everyone's movement by that and that's how much they get to move per IP (whether they have an IP left or not). That promotes a little bit more simultaneity and gives the people with fewer IPs something to do until their next action.

It's a pain, though, and it gets all wacky when people's IPs can dynamically change. So I'm not really sure how to best handle it.

[Mr. Unpronouncea...]

Err...if you're using edge the dice do explode, don't they?
(with the exceptions of rolling edge after the test, or rerolling failures.)

[blakkie]

[Mr. Unpronouncea...]

I guess...but his example was specifically a character whose pool had been reduced to zero and whose edge was less than the threshold needed - so you'd roll edge with exploding dice to solve the problem (which doesn't seem to exist, because that's what you would do anyway.)

[Eryk the Red]

The book specifically says that the Rule of 6 doesn't apply on Long Shot tests. The idea here is to say that it does.

[Mr. Unpronouncea...]

ah - that's what I was missing...thanks.

[SL James]

[Eryk the Red]

I'll take a sanctimonious prick over someone just being belligerent.

[SL James]

That's because you don't know what you're talking about, newbie.

[Kleaner]

[stevebugge]

Why do I get the feeling that sooner or later Bull is going to be very busy with this thread...........

[Magus]

Or Adam. It seems that when ever James gets passionate about something the thread goes to Hell.

[Dashifen]

My biggest problem is the lack of interesting combat options for Astral and Matrix combat. Ranged and Melee have all these interesting modifiers that a player and GM can use to create tactical situations. Granted, they also encompass perhaps the largest percentage of combat in the game. Thus, I can understand why they were focused on first and Astral/Virtual combat comes second. Perhaps we'll see a return of the Matrix Combat Maneuvers from SR3 when we get Unwired, and Astral combat has always been kind of a I-hit-you-now-you-hit-me kind of thing. To that end I think we could do this:

For Matrix Combat:
Change matrix attacks back to a simple action. Then, allow the three maneuvers from third addition (parry, position, and evade) as follows. Note, I use Pilot for the skill used by the opponents below. Obviously, if you're maneuvering against a hacker, use Hacking or Computers as appropriate. As before, the maneuvers are all simple actions.

• To parry, roll Hacking + Armor, each hit gives you a +1 modification to your Armor for the following attack and only the following attack. That could mean you end up with a huge defense roll for one attack, but because matrix attacks are now simple actions again, the opponent can always try to hit you again if necessary. Glitches mean nothing happens, or maybe a slight bonus to the opponent, critical glitches could crash your Armor program or reduce it by the hits, etc.
  
  
• To position, roll Hacking + Analyze vs. Pilot + Analyze, net hits give a +1 modifier to the winner's Attack on the following round. Note, as in SR3, this means that you can end up hurting yourself rather than helping when using this maneuver. Upon further consideration, and with a review of the Melee Combat Modifiers, if the positioning character wins, they are considered to have the Superior Position modifier (+2). If they lose, then their opponent gets said modifier. I use Analyze for the program on this test because the position maneuver is all about assessing the combat's progress and using your program to detect weaknesses in the target's icon.
  
  
• Evading is the hardest one to translate. Since the SR3 version of this maneuver allowed you to evade for X combat turns reduced by any security tally increases you made, it cannot directly translate as SR4 has no security tally. Thus, I think it works best like this: the evading character rolls Hacking + Stealth. The total number of hits times two on this test become a threshold for an extended test made by the evaded icon. The extended test has an interval of 1 combat turn and is made with Pilot + Analyze. Icons evaded as a group may perform may use Teamwork to re-locate an evaded icon.
  
  Example
  Hacky McHacksalot is being attacked in cybercombat by 2 IC programs. Luckily, he goes first. Since he doesn't want to crash the programs and risk alerting the host, he decides that flight wins out, in this case, over fight. He rolls his Hacking + Stealth program and gets 3 hits. The IC programs work together to try and relocate Hacky, which requires a Pilot + Analyze (6, 1 combat turn) test. One program assists the other, giving it 2 more dice in the Teamwork Test, and the other IC rolls 4 hits on the first interval, giving Hacky a chance to try and log off.
  
  Now, if you're savvy you might wonder why you'd do an evade since you could log off in the middle of cybercombat. Well, my other addition to matrix combat is the use of the interception rules, that is if someone is attempting to perform a matrix action other than cybercombat, then the opponent's icons can attempt to intercept and block that action using the interception rules from normal melee combat. Thus, without evading first, then you might be blocked in your attempts to do something else.

Things have gotten a little more interesting for Astral combat since you can cast spells as normal while on the Astral plane now, bringing in an element of ranged combat, especially when using the indirect combat spells. I'd like to see some metamagics that deal specifically with Astral combat, perhaps one that provides a projected magician the ability to make a ranged astral combat attack rather than just melee attacks. But I haven't honestly given it as much thought because Astral combat doesn't come up as much in my games as Matrix.

[Cain]

[Synner]

[Austere Emancipa...]

[Nevermind.]

[Rotbart van Dain...]

[blakkie]

[Azralon]

[Cain]

[Azralon]

[Cain]

How about: "In twenty five years of gaming, I've never encountered a player who liked it in the slightest"?

[hobgoblin]

[Azralon]