IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> An alternative to soysages, Grow your own meat!
ronin3338
post Apr 1 2006, 09:39 PM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 314
Joined: 25-February 06
Member No.: 8,307



Wow... really, really, REALLY off topic. :eek:

Still, manufacturing meat in your home for consumption is scary.

Joe Dropout making meat at the local McWendy King, that's gonna give me nightmares. Think about it, there'll be a commercial version before a home version, and they won't have to ship frozen patties (of whatever meat they DO use). That means your Double Whopping Cheese McGreaser is gonna be made by the flunkie in the back that you just saw picking his nose in the parking lot on his smoke break. And I don't mean cooked, I mean made with whatever "meat starter" they decide to use...

Uggh. I think I'll skip lunch today.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Apr 1 2006, 09:53 PM
Post #27


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (nezumi)
QUOTE (Wounded Ronin @ Mar 29 2006, 05:22 PM)
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685 @ Mar 29 2006, 04:37 PM)
Wah-hah-hah-hah-haah. :)


No, I've seen it. But that requires a lot of conditioning on her part to do that without splitting.

Well, soft tissue has unlimited stretching capacity. That's why phimosis can be cured by stretching, and why people who wear heavy earrings all the time get long earlobes.

So, I'm pretty sure that with stretching any custom appendage could be accomidated.

I suspect inserting a foot and a half of meat from between the pelvis and into the abdominal cavity WITH stretching would be dangerous and would take lots of time to prepare for. Inserting said meat without years of stretching would likely result in... dissatisfaction for one party or the other (or both). I also suspect most women are not especially interested in getting a foot and a half long vagina installed (or stretching their existing one out to that length) in order to allow us to indulge our male egos.

Actually, most nerve endings in the penis are in the first 1/3, same for the vagina so shallow strokes can be satasifying. For the most part length doesn't matter for that reason. Now, girth, on the other hand....

As for the potential for bad meat, that is true for any commercial process. Unless you kill it, butcher it, and cook it yourself there is no telling what you're getting. Statistically, you are far more likely to be intentionally poisioned by a home cooked meal than be accidently poisioned by a commercial meal. A little urine in the coffee usually isn't harmfull.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirKodiak
post Apr 2 2006, 12:59 AM
Post #28


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 120
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 6,298



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Statistically, you are far more likely to be intentionally poisioned by a home cooked meal than be accidently poisioned by a commercial meal.

Considering that I cook my own home-cooked meals, that is either a terrifying or reassuring statistic, depending on how you look at it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Apr 2 2006, 02:15 AM
Post #29


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



I think we're worried about unintentional poisonings than intentional ones, Hyz.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Apr 2 2006, 02:43 AM
Post #30


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (SirKodiak @ Apr 1 2006, 07:59 PM)
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Statistically, you are far more likely to be intentionally poisioned by a home cooked meal than be accidently poisioned by a commercial meal.

Considering that I cook my own home-cooked meals, that is either a terrifying or reassuring statistic, depending on how you look at it.

It should be reassuring. You probably won't intentionally poision yourself.

QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
I think we're worried about unintentional poisonings than intentional ones, Hyz.


That's because you aren't paranoid enough.



Anyway, the big dangers with food aren't foreign objects, pests, or bodily fluids. The big danger is bacteria from undercooked meats and contamination of vegetables with meat bacteria by using unwashed ultinsils and cutting boards used on uncooked meat. This is more probable in home cooked food than in resturants but in resturants one mistake will cause many people to become ill instead of just one or a few. Likewise, bodily fluid contamination (often intentional) and foreign object contamination is more likely in resturants than in home. These are generally more shocking and disgusting but they are also less dangerous than bacteria.

Heavy metal contamination can be a concern because this can happen at a farm and remain undetected. This is why it is important to test farm soil for toxic heavy metals. (marijuna grown in heavy metal rich soil can cause heavy metal toxicity in people who smoke it, for example). Other toxic materials can enter food during growing or processing through accident, mishap, or negligence but it is unlikely.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Apr 3 2006, 02:24 PM
Post #31


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (SirKodiak)
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Statistically, you are far more likely to be intentionally poisioned by a home cooked meal than be accidently poisioned by a commercial meal.

Considering that I cook my own home-cooked meals, that is either a terrifying or reassuring statistic, depending on how you look at it.

Then make sure your name doesn't appear as the primary beneficiary on your life insurance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
De Badd Ass
post Apr 5 2006, 04:57 AM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 619
Joined: 18-April 03
From: The UV Nexus
Member No.: 4,474



QUOTE (PBTHHHHT)
QUOTE (Lindt @ Mar 28 2006, 12:31 PM)
Its certinly an interesting idea.  But something on the 3rd page just kinda threw me off a little...

In 2003, scientists in the United States announced that they had successfully grown a rabbit penis in the lab.

Well, scientist do have some perverse sense of priority on what to grow first, though I think they gotta get out of the lab more often... :|

Based on a random sampling of late-nite infomercials, I'd say those scientists are searching for the holy grail. Seems like one-outa-eight infomercials claims their product can make a penis grow. Ron Popeil has seven ways you can chop it up and cook it.

You want kraut on that dog?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlainWhiteSocks
post Jun 22 2006, 05:08 PM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 132
Joined: 24-August 05
From: Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Member No.: 7,611



In this article it said there was a group of people willing to fund a home incubator so they could grow human tissue for consumption. If that is the case then good ol Dunkies prize for coming up with edible synthetic ghoul chow could be redundant. Unless the ghouls need essence or something like it to feed from, in which case it could prove to be much more complicated. Something of a magical essence generator needed.

Test Tube Meat Article
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Jun 22 2006, 05:17 PM
Post #34


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Boy, this takes "Made when you order it" burgers to a whole new level...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jun 22 2006, 07:20 PM
Post #35


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...this validates KK's allergy to meat flaw considering that it would make meat products more common.

"eeeeyuuuuu! [edit] "Frankenfurters", how totally gross!"

-Kyoto Kid [in character]

....man, no instant Karma for missing that one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd October 2025 - 10:03 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.