IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Area effect spells at Point Blank Range
jklst14
post Apr 16 2006, 07:28 PM
Post #1


CosaNostra Deliverator
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 346
Joined: 29-January 05
From: Philadelphia, PA
Member No.: 7,034



If a mage casts a manaball or similar spell at such close range that he is also caught within the spell's area of effect, is the mage affected by his own spell?

I'm inclined to think yes, but we had a discussion in our group about this and I just wanted to see what others thought.

Thanks!

JKL

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dv84good
post Apr 16 2006, 07:34 PM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 30-January 06
Member No.: 8,213



The rule is everything in sight I believe he nose is in sight.

So my question is an Invisible character in LOS?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fool
post Apr 16 2006, 07:40 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 27-February 06
Member No.: 8,316



If the mage is astrally perceiving then yes (at -2 d pool I believe) an invisible character is in los.
I would say that not only is his nose visible but so is his cornea as well as the jelly like fluid (I can never remember what its called looks like I need to go back and bone up on my A+P) that fills the eyeball and seperates the retina (the part that actually perceives) and the cornea (where the lens is that focuses your vision). SO definitely a mage can effect himself at point blank range (othermmise he wouldn't be able to use counterspelling on himself) and if he counterspells an area effect spell it counts for everyone in the radius of the spell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dv84good
post Apr 16 2006, 08:00 PM
Post #4


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 30-January 06
Member No.: 8,213



I really meant opposing mage when you are not astrally perceiving.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fool
post Apr 16 2006, 09:47 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 27-February 06
Member No.: 8,316



if you aren't astrally perceiving and the character is invisible you would only hit him with an elemental combat spell since they can effect targets that aren't in los (another reason to take them.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Apr 16 2006, 09:51 PM
Post #6


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



Self in LOS? GM's call. Usually I apply a die pool penalty if the character doesn't wish to hit themself, because if their hands are in the FoV, then they can see themselves.

Invisible? Yes and no. Their invisibility penalty is applied to the die pool for hitting them, like cover. Only if someone 100% cannot be seen are they out of the AoE.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Apr 17 2006, 04:56 AM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (jklst14)
If a mage casts a manaball or similar spell at such close range that he is also caught within the spell's area of effect, is the mage affected by his own spell?

I'm inclined to think yes, but we had a discussion in our group about this and I just wanted to see what others thought.

Thanks!

JKL

In the past my group has said no, it only applied to targets you can "make out", so no fingers, toes, etc would count. However, they might still be subject to secondary effects like fire, ice, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sandchigger
post Apr 17 2006, 05:27 PM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 2-April 06
Member No.: 8,425



QUOTE (fool)
If the mage is astrally perceiving then yes (at -2 d pool I believe) an invisible character is in los.
I would say that not only is his nose visible but so is his cornea as well as the jelly like fluid (I can never remember what its called looks like I need to go back and bone up on my A+P) that fills the eyeball and seperates the retina (the part that actually perceives) and the cornea (where the lens is that focuses your vision). SO definitely a mage can effect himself at point blank range (othermmise he wouldn't be able to use counterspelling on himself) and if he counterspells an area effect spell it counts for everyone in the radius of the spell.

It's called vitreous humour. It's salty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
K2Grey
post Apr 17 2006, 05:29 PM
Post #9


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 8-March 06
Member No.: 8,344



So what happens if the mage gets cybereyes and a special helmet that obscures the nose from vision?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lagomorph
post Apr 17 2006, 05:48 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 834
Joined: 30-June 03
Member No.: 4,832



IIRC, with non elemental combat spells, you already have the option of choosing which aura's are affected and which aren't so you can put your nose's aura on the exclude list and cast all day.

In the case of elemental combat spells, like fireball, put some sunscreen on :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Apr 17 2006, 09:15 PM
Post #11


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



My understanding is that SR4 spells hit *everyone* in the radius. Since you're basically slamming a huge wave of mana down onto everything you can percieve, I'd say that includes yourself. If you want to avoid hitting yourself, cast it somewhat in front of you with a small enough radius to not fry your own brain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 17 2006, 09:18 PM
Post #12


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



If you didn't have line of sight to yourself, tons of spells would stop being castable on yourself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sandchigger
post Apr 17 2006, 09:40 PM
Post #13


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 2-April 06
Member No.: 8,425



Um, no, James, because you can always look down at your foot and then BAM! line of sight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 17 2006, 09:50 PM
Post #14


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



You're also assuming you can avoid looking at yourself when casting. Casting is not a purely mental action, and so could easily involve hand movements in front of you or something else that would put a piece of your body in front of you. It's pretty hard to be in a combat situation and not see even the tiniest portion of yuorself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Apr 17 2006, 10:04 PM
Post #15


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



I can't look in any direction without seeing part of my nose or eyebrow ridge with at least one of my eyes. Besides, your eyes are inside of your aura, which extends out to what, an inch or two away from your skin?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fool
post Apr 18 2006, 12:53 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 27-February 06
Member No.: 8,316



yeah something like that otherwise full body armor would protect from such spells.
Furthermore, If you want to be counterspelling yourself, you have to have los. Makes having los on yourself realy kinda important.
Besides, I still go with you see your vitreous humor (I remembered it last night while doing dishes) and cornea even if your eyes are bugging out the front of your head all chameleon like.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 18 2006, 12:55 AM
Post #17


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



And don't forget the handy little fact that it helps curtail piont blank ball spell cheese. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Apr 18 2006, 08:01 AM
Post #18


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



Someone refresh my memory about AE magic and cover and visibilty modifiers.

If you did indeed get them for cover/lighting, then I'd offer the caster of PBAE spell a good bonus since they indeed seeing so little of themselves as a target.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Apr 18 2006, 01:36 PM
Post #19


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Magic is effected by cover and lighting. This is why cybereyes were such a popular option for mages.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 18 2006, 02:11 PM
Post #20


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (James McMurray)
Casting is not a purely mental action...

i don't believe you're correct on this point. the only time handwaving, or any other movement, comes into play is if you've got a gesture geas, or if you use some sort of movement/motion-based centering such as dance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Apr 18 2006, 02:32 PM
Post #21


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



To use D&D terms, there aren't necessarily any verbal or somatic components to SR spells. That's fluff that you can layer on depending upon your magician's particular style. All that's really required is concentration.

The concentration required for a Force 3 spell isn't usually going to be noticed by your average guy on the street (who'll default to 2 dice when rolling Perception, and therefore can't make the 3 hits needed to spot you staring at your target).

A Force 4 needs only 2 hits to notice, so Average Joe is capable but unlikely to notice/interpret your intense look of concentration as spellcasting.

Force 5 needs only 1 hit to be noticed because you're probably staring holes into your target while an unseen wind ruffles your hair, or everyone nearby feels a strange tingle, or the screams of the damned can be faintly heard, or whatever. Maybe you're muttering and gesturing at that point.

Force 6 or higher doesn't really even require a roll to notice, so who knows how crazy your special effects budget gets at that point. You could be jumping up and down, yelling "I AM CASTING A SPELL AT YOU" while ghostly unicorns fire laser beams at your enemies for all the game mechanics care.

As the rules stand right now, the Centering metamagic technique requires you to spend an additional Free Action while spellcasting (as a Complex Action) to either chant, dance, wiggle your fingers dramatically, or whatnot. Basically whatever you're doing while Centering makes the magic "automatically obvious" just as if you had cast it higher than Force 5.

.... So technically, right now casting is a purely mental action (Centering aside) but for sake of flavor there are verbal/somatic/environmental clues that become more obvious as the Force gets higher and higher.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 18 2006, 03:40 PM
Post #22


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



I opt for the 'noticable because of talking and/or gesturing" interpretation over the "noticable because of special effects interpretation." Does it actually say casting is mental, or does it just allow you to add gestures via centering? If you're just adding gestures, those could easily be extra ones above and beyond the normal ones. Although fiction != rules, I can't think of any examples in the few SR books I've read where someone just wills something to happen and it does.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 03:49 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



it has always said casting was mental

also you can always affect something with a LOSspell tatyou are touching, even if you can't see it

and a magician is always 'touching' himself
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Apr 18 2006, 03:53 PM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (Kremlin KOA)
and a magician is always 'touching' himself

Hey, now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Apr 18 2006, 03:54 PM
Post #25


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Also, you can cast a spell while bond and gagged, so spell casting required neither speach nor gestures.

[edit]
Most mages are also often touching their ally spirits as well :D
[/edit]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 05:54 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.