IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Armor in 4th., Can you layer?
Teulisch
post Apr 25 2006, 07:43 PM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 565
Joined: 7-January 04
Member No.: 5,965



ffba would still be usefull. as long as you dont get a penalty, its a VERY good idea to have decent armor on beneath your regular clothes. If they want it to work like it did in old editions, they could make it a +2/+1 or something, but i suspect the new rules are moving us away from such sillyness.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Apr 25 2006, 07:58 PM
Post #27


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



books will tell...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
juggertroll
post Apr 27 2006, 11:34 AM
Post #28


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 22-March 06
From: Salvador, Brazil
Member No.: 8,395



probably, but if layering become gold some players will think this way:

Gm: now my players can layer armors!!

Pc: so my 10 body troll will use 2 full body armors!!!

i like to see better rules for layering then the ones alredy existing
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Apr 27 2006, 04:59 PM
Post #29


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Layering has traditionally worked in such a way that something that would feasibly fit over or under some other thing (a vest under a long coat, FFBA under an armored jacket, armored clothing under a leather jacket, that kind of thing) were layerable, but random-ass combinations (i'm gonna wear three suits of FFBA, since they don't count towards penalties for layering in SR3!) didn't layer solely because of the simple virtue of being two (or three) items of armor. Sanity wins out in these cases.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
juggertroll
post Apr 28 2006, 11:19 AM
Post #30


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 22-March 06
From: Salvador, Brazil
Member No.: 8,395



Sanity is a very good quality in rpg sometimes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DigitalMage
post Apr 28 2006, 12:49 PM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 26-February 02
From: UK
Member No.: 340



Slightly off topic, but remember that in 3rd edition FFBA doesn't count when working out penalties due to layering. However the losses to COmbat Pool have absolutely nothing to do with layering (i.e. they apply if even one piece of armour has sufficiently high ratings), therefore by the RAW FFBA woudl still count for determining Combat pool penalties.

I think the above is correct, its been a while.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 02:35 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.